2020 Presidential Race

#85,303
#85,303
37L1 said:
You know this for a fact? That's his reason for not releasing them?

Why not ask him via twitter?

Or the press will just have to work a little bit harder to investigate as if everything they do is served up on a silver platter.

It's out there, go find it, I can imagine Perry White telling that to Clark Kent.
Click to expand...
That was the reason he gave yesterday while dripping hair dye at his press conference.
 
#85,304
#85,304
VolinWayne said:
Exactly!! If these allegations are false it should be pretty easy for them to prove
Click to expand...
GoBigOrangeUT said:
"The burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded, and its opponents need not argue further in order to dismiss it."

• ⁠Hitchens
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BenGrimm
#85,307
#85,307
BowlBrother85 said:
That was the reason he gave yesterday while dripping hair dye at his press conference.
Click to expand...
So he said that he wasn't giving them out because "Giuliani wont release the affidavits to the media, because he doesn't want them scrutinized. He knows that they would be discredited."?

Please link me that quote or any quote that even comes close to him saying that.

I watched a little bit at lunch break and caught a bit about not releasing due to harassment/threats to the persons that gave their sworn statements. And that they would be attached to all the lawsuits documentation that were going to be presented in court. He then read from one statement in which he had permission to identify the person making it, which he did.

But I didn't hear him say that he wasn't giving out that information "because he doesn't want them scrutinized and knows that they would be discredited."

Maybe I missed it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and AM64
#85,308
#85,308
37L1 said:
So he said that he wasn't giving them out because "Giuliani wont release the affidavits to the media, because he doesn't want them scrutinized. He knows that they would be discredited."?

Please link me that quote or any quote that even comes close to him saying that.

I watched a little bit at lunch break and caught a bit about not releasing due to harassment/threats to the persons that gave their sworn statements. And that they would be attached to all the lawsuits documentation that were going to be presented in court. He then read from one statement in which he had permission to identify the person making it, which he did.

But I didn't hear him say that he wasn't giving out that information "because he doesn't want them scrutinized and knows that they would be discredited."

Maybe I missed it?
Click to expand...
I added some commentary, but Rudy did allude to not wanting the people making claims in these affidavits to be scrutinized. He called it "harassment". Anyone else would simply call it "performing due diligence".
 
#85,310
#85,310
Grand Vol said:
Bet you don't either.
Click to expand...
I know enough to about him to know that he hates being called “Mad Dog”, his actual call sign is CHAOS-6, he is seen as the first of a few intellectual American military officers, he is the only Marine Corps officer to command a naval task force, he opposed withdrawing the U.S. from the Iran nuclear agreement, considers both Russia and China threats to the post WWII world order, believes the State Department should be just as well funded as DoD and his recommend reading list for leaders is a-1. “Duty” by Robert Gates and “Diplomacy” and “World Order” by Henry Kissinger are the ones I liked the most. I think his best quote has to be

“If you don’t fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately,"
 
#85,311
#85,311
BowlBrother85 said:
I added some commentary, but Rudy did allude to not wanting the people making claims in these affidavits to be scrutinized. He called it "harassment". Anyone else would simply call it "performing due diligence".
Click to expand...
Just listen to yourself.

You should be a reporter with all the editorializing that you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, NorthDallas40 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#85,314
#85,314
BowlBrother85 said:
I added some commentary, but Rudy did allude to not wanting the people making claims in these affidavits to be scrutinized. He called it "harassment". Anyone else would simply call it "performing due diligence".
Click to expand...

Damn if there was a way to maybe black out identifying information. Some kind of thing you could use like a highlighter, but more black instead of yellow.
 
#85,324
#85,324
carlos86 said:
I know enough to about him to know that he hates being called “Mad Dog”, his actual call sign is CHAOS-6, he is seen as the first of a few intellectual American military officers, he is the only Marine Corps officer to command a naval task force, he opposed withdrawing the U.S. from the Iran nuclear agreement, considers both Russia and China threats to the post WWII world order, believes the State Department should be just as well funded as DoD and his recommend reading list for leaders is a-1. “Duty” by Robert Gates and “Diplomacy” and “World Order” by Henry Kissinger are the ones I liked the most. I think his best quote has to be

“If you don’t fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately,"
Click to expand...

So, just **** you read.

Got it.

And FYI, that Naval Expeditionary Task Force he commanded? Yeah, that was a ground task force. You should read up on the Naval War College paper on it. Don't act like he was out there pulling an Admiral Halsey commanding a carrier task force or something.

And don't forget, that's when he left a bunch of ODA guys out to hang.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and NorthDallas40
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement
Back
Top