2020 Presidential Race

They are more interested in appearance. They are rather shallow in that regard. They only understand pictures and crayon drawings.

We also dabble in water colors.
Rudy-Giuliani-GettyImages-1229683394.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
What was the treason ?

Did you know that in the early 50s McGhee-Tyson (now the guard side) was a real Air Force Base with two fighter squadrons? My dad was a pilot and Armament and Electronics Officer, and Alexander Butterfield was a pilot at the same time. I rarely heard my dad criticize another person and more rarely another officer, but Alexander Butterfield was definitely an exception. I don't know the background, and it's far too late to ask. Alexander Butterfield went on to work for Nixon, and he was the guy who oversaw the installation of and later divulged that the taping system existed. Nixon and his top level staff made some poor staffing choices.
 


Lin Woods lawsuit booted to the curb. Are we counting that in the official tally or does that just make Wood 0-1 and Trump still 1-31?


If no poll watcher has standing to bring violations before a court, what good are poll watchers?
 
@hUTch2002 actually, I don’t know that they removed the signature matching requirement. I think they ruled that they had to give due process to the voter.
Poor wording on my part. They didn’t remove the requirement for verifying signatures. My understanding is any irregularities found wouldn’t invalidate the vote. In prior elections irregularities would have made the vote invalid. That’s how I understood the change.
 
If no poll watcher has standing to bring violations before a court, what good are poll watchers?

I don’t think Woods was a pole watcher. He was suing as a voter. His lawsuit sought to dictate the manner of the last 3 Georgia elections (after the fact). One person can’t do that:

 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Poor wording on my part. They didn’t remove the requirement for verifying signatures. My understanding is any irregularities found wouldn’t invalidate the vote. In prior elections irregularities would have made the vote invalid. That’s how I understood the change.
I’m not sure. I didn’t follow that case as closely once it got rejected. I thought they had to give an opportunity to cure the defect. (Which would explain why a lower % of absentee votes were tossed, this cycle).
 
Funny. I just scanned the headlines and didn't see any recounts released yet. You've seen the future?

I doubt it on Trump destroying confidence in the election process; seems like the elections commissions and states with mail it in elections have done that all by themselves. What I do hope is that Trump leaves scorched earth as he goes out - starting with an investigation of Biden much like the one that hamstrung Trump. And I hope he leaves behind some people in key positions so that Biden can't fire them and undermine their damage without looking like a hypocrite. For starters.
You beat me to it. I hope that Trump leaves at least as many land mines for Biden as Obama did for him. I would spend the next couple of months figuring out the very best way to f*** over that bunch of a$$holes from both parties that made it hard for him to govern.
 
If no poll watcher has standing to bring violations before a court, what good are poll watchers?
Also, what harm does the watcher suffer? The court isn’t election police. They’re there to resolve disputes and remedy harm.

The correct process is that the poll watchers tell the campaign. The campaign then asks the court to make them whole. They have the obligation to show proof that they actually suffered meaningful harm, which in Trump’s case would probably mean showing that the probable discrepancies changed the outcome.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top