2020 Presidential Race

Specifically, what is it that Rudy is lying about? It's your claim that he doesn't have the testimony and affidavits that he claims to have?


Specifically, the affidavits have been reviewed and don’t allege near the number of problems that he’s claiming they do.

Specifically, at least one Judge found the more outrageous claims to be overly generic, inconsistent with other affidavits, and not credible.

Specifically, his statements are internally inconsistent. For example, he said Philadelphia has cheated in elections for 60 years, but then pointed to recent history of fair election practices to complain about people being asked to observe from a distance.

I only listened for 10 minutes and I got three.
 
Powell and the team are on television claiming to have documented proof of things that @GoBigOrangeUT is already on record as saying should overturn the election if proven. In case anyone is wondering why I'm accusing him of being scared ____less...
Once again, claiming to have proof and actually having proof are indeed two different things. I can claim all kinds of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
Why would me agreeing or not agreeing with them have anything to do with whether I find them corrupt?

You can SMH all you want, you come from a dishonest point of view if you believe mail voting isnt ripe for fraud.

Well, facts are facts: ALL but one of Trump's many lawsuits alleging vote corruption (mail-in or otherwise) have been summarily dismissed by umpteen Federal Courts.

Trump is nothing more than a sore loser and serial liar. You want to believe his lies, knock yourself out.
 
Specifically, the affidavits have been reviewed and don’t allege near the number of problems that he’s claiming they do.

Specifically, at least one Judge found the more outrageous claims to be overly generic, inconsistent with other affidavits, and not credible.

Specifically, his statements are internally inconsistent. For example, he said Philadelphia has cheated in elections for 60 years, but then pointed to recent history of fair election practices to complain about people being asked to observe from a distance.

I only listened for 10 minutes and I got three.

You only listened for 10 minutes and know what all of their claims are and how they've been ruled on?
 
My understanding is two-fold. To overwhelm the process, and to produce fraudulent paper votes to match the fake numbers.

Lord have mercy. This conspiracy is just getting more convoluted by the minute.

I turned on that press conference and heard them spouting about Venezuela and George Soros. The typical Republican boogey men.

Rudy up there with his hair dye dripping down his cheeks going on about affidavits. We’ve already seen how credible the ones they have presented have been.

If they have the evidence then bring it to court. These press conferences produce nothing.... but late night comedy fodder.
 
One thing Rudy asked that might need to be addressed. He asked if you think that all of these state election officials woke up on Nov 3rd and had the exact same plan independent of one another or do you think that this was coordinated?

I think that if you throw out a teaser like that, you had better have something in your back pocket that actually shows coordination between multiple states of some kind. he threw it out there like the Biden campaign was the chief architect of the scheme and coordinator.

He better have receipts...
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and jp1
He asked if I thought he was a liar. He apparently thinks he isn’t. Here we have proof he is.

As I've said all along. I'm in a "wait and see" mode. I'm humble enough to say that I have little visibility behind the curtain, so I can't say one way or another. I hope that information comes out in such ways that we all understand what happened, or didn't.

You, on the other hand, when claims are made that scare you, impulse-scream "liar!" with a certain level of certainty that belies a lot.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top