--------------------------------So let me get this straight.....you think we need to reenter the coaching search process that we've done since 2008? Okay, I get it......but exactly why do we need to do that, in the manner we have....for the past 12 years? I don't mind a shake up or change.....I do mind ABSOLUTELY, doing the same steps again. That, my friend, is insanity.
Again, not adverse to change.....doing it the same way we always have.....NO. I'm not on board.
You make a very good point. If we are gonna go after another hc that does not have a winning tradition in a good conference, no need to change. And preferably a proven coach in the sec. That would mean Urban, or Freeze. Bob Stoops does have ties to sec, and he is a proven winner. Other than those 3 stick with what we have.
No, not really. However, you are suggesting that we do exactly what I'm advocating NOT to. There is NO guarantee of success with Urban, Freeze or Stoops here. Maybe the chances of success are higher, but that is about it. I'll say this though...it's not sustainable. So why bother? I'm shaking the tree and suggesting no HC in the traditional way......no Urban, no Freeze and no Stoops. Just no. I'm just purely suggesting no HC in the traditional way.....at all. Why? Because it hasn't worked for the majority of the P5 programs for 20+ years. Not if your goal is a NC.