MarcoVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 20,592
- Likes
- 98,450
It's a fixed price contract that has been known for 3 months. I think Pfizer was going to be used either way, if they produced a viable vaccine or another company did. They would use Pfizer's capacity to manufacture doses.Interesting that this isn't really spiking Pfizer's stock price. It's back to where it was earlier in the year
To date, the most rapid vaccine development and approval has been mumps, which took four years. Typically, there is over a decade involved.
Purewicks, yankeurs, a dozen other things that have nothing to do with covid, but in my last 2 hospitals we have ppe out the yingyang.What resources are hospitals short of?
Taking government money to pay for development vs spending your own money and agreeing to a deal with the gov’t for distribution where you only get paid IF your vaccine is successful are vastly different.
It’s a miracle. A mere days after election and Pfizer says it’s 100% ready.
Correct. All we did with H1N1 is plug and play with the existing flu vaccine. I'm sure you are aware that different strains are used each year.I have read this previously, but I think the H1N1 vaccine was developed within the year. Is that categorized differently since it was a novel strain of influenza rather than a novel virus?
Making yourselves more vulnerable in the long run is not smart.
Ruining the economy from a disease that currently kills .4% of those infected. For comparison the spanish flu killed .6% of the total US population. Covid is .06% of the total.
It's not smart to use numbers with no concept of what they mean.
Correct. All we did with H1N1 is plug and play with the existing flu vaccine. I'm sure you are aware that different strains are used each year.
