Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

Do you believe all "science" and "scientists" are noble, objective, and without agenda?
Of course not. But they are more noble, objective, and without agenda than most other professions.
Obviously you must always consider the source and judge on the totality of the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Of course not. But they are more noble, objective, and without agenda than most other professions.
Obviously you must always consider the source and judge on the totality of the evidence.

LOL more noble, objective, and without agenda than most other professions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Do you even read, dude? WHO advises people to vaccinate.

You’re completely missing the point. Herd immunity is achieved regardless. It’s not just a “let people get it” strategy. Herd immunity is achieved through both possible processes. It’s achieved through immunization. AND it can be achieved through population immunity. With a disease that has proven to be minimally problematic for the majority of our population, we can be doing both at the same time rather than just sitting and waiting for a vaccine that may or may not have complications and may or not be effective.

But enjoying your fishing. I prefer Maine striper fishing.
 
You assume that I think Trump is a smart person

God have mercy on you if you do.

Man, I'm seeing lots of big redneck trucks here in the OBX flying their Trump 2020 MAGA flags / screw you commie liberals!!!

*sigh*

6 days and all this is over, thankfully... well, except for the civil war that Dumb Donald incites.
 
You’re completely missing the point. Herd immunity is achieved regardless. It’s not just a “let people get it” strategy. Herd immunity is achieved through both possible processes. It’s achieved through immunization. AND it can be achieved through population immunity. With a disease that has proven to be minimally problematic for the majority of our population, we can be doing both at the same time rather than just sitting and waiting for a vaccine that may or may not have complications and may or not be effective.

But enjoying your fishing. I prefer Maine striper fishing.

Kennibunkport stripers? Bush approves.

We used to get big stripers down here in the winter, but they've been MIA for like 7 years I think. Now we only have strippers to entertain during the cold months.

EDIT:

Yesterday, I'm fishing for trout in the surf AM. Guy and his ~8 YO kiddo come fishing near me. 2nd cast, the boy lands a citation trout (below).

*sigh*

I'm going fishing in like 20 minutes... conditions should be gravy.

kiddo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Just a name of that caliber luth
How about these? What caliber? At what age do you place Dotard Donnie?
Low IQ Maxine Waters = Rep. Maxine Waters
Horseface = Stormy Daniels
Pocahontas, The Indian, Goofy = Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Cryin' Chuck, Head Clown, Fake Tears = Sen. Chuck Shumer
Dumb Southerner = Jeff Sessions
Marbles in his Mouth = Tom Brokaw
Sloppy Carl = Carl Bernstein
Pencil Neck, Shifty Schiff = Adam Schiff
Little Marco = Sen. Marco Rubio
Wacky Jacky = Sen. Jacky Rosen
The Nutty Professor = Sen. Bernie Sanders
Foul Mouthed Omar = Rep. Ilhan Omar
Cheatin' Obama = Pres. Barack Obama
Jeff Flakey = Sen. Jeff Flake
Al Frankenstein = Sen. Al Franken
Sleepy Joe = Joe Biden
Crooked Hillary = Hillary Clinton
Alfred E. Neuman = Mayor Pete Buttigieg
Fredo = Chris Cuomo
Sissy = Graydon Carter
Dumb as a Rock = Mika Brzezinski
Psycho Joe = Joe Scarborough
Goofball Atheist = Penn Jillette
Miss Piggy = Alicia Machado
Fat Jerry = Rep. Jerry Nadler
 
There is no better option than listening to the best science available. You listen with the knowledge that it is incomplete and ever changing. You also have to weigh and understand conflicting objectives.

1. hard to say what the best science available is on these issues at this point
2. my point is that people are cherry picking the science that fits their agenda and pointing to it as justification while claiming "I'm listening to science".
 
Advertisement





Back
Top