golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,317
- Likes
- 57,534
No kidding. We have people on the record with proof that Hunter Biden was coordinating business deals w Joe while he was vice president and seeking payments for them both. Dems clearly don't care about corruption, which is evidenced prior to this, and their crying about Trump is entirely disingenuous. No integrity, no shame. PatheticSo, are we only believing unnamed sources?
lmao, this would be the biggest scandal w wall to wall coverage on every channel. The house would have already impeached him and ANTIFA would be burning down Washingtonhonestly if this were trump it would maybe be in the news cycle for a half day. The fact this will be getting even a modest amount of attention for the next week on conservative outlets shows the desperation.
"Due to my worsening dementia, I can neither confirm nor deny whether I set my drug-addicted son up as a board member of a Ukrainian energy company that was under investigation for corruption, used him as a conduit for bribes and kickbacks, and then used my influence as the VP of the USA--and foreign policy head over the region--to use 1 billion taxpayer dollars as blackmail quid pro quo to force Ukraine to fire the prosecutor that was investigating said energy company's corruption.So the Biden campaign still does not deny any of this
This statement released by the Joe Biden campaign was published in Politico.com on October 14, 2020 at 8:29 pm EDT, and it was included in a report written by Kyle Cheney and Natasha Bertrand:Link?
This statement released by the Joe Biden campaign was published in Politico.com on October 14, 2020 at 8:29 pm EDT, and it was included in a report written by Kyle Cheney and Natasha Bertrand:
POLITICO:
"We have reviewed Joe Biden's official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place. Investigations by the press, during impeachment, and even by two Republican-led Senate committees whose work was decried as 'not legitimate' and political by a GOP colleague have all reached the same conclusion: that Joe Biden carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing. Trump administration officials have attested to these facts under oath. The NY Post never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story. They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani - whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported - claimed to have such materials."
- Andrew Bates, Joe Biden campaign spokesman
This statement released by the Joe Biden campaign was published in Politico.com on October 14, 2020 at 8:29 pm EDT, and it was included in a report written by Kyle Cheney and Natasha Bertrand:
POLITICO:
"We have reviewed Joe Biden's official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place. Investigations by the press, during impeachment, and even by two Republican-led Senate committees whose work was decried as 'not legitimate' and political by a GOP colleague have all reached the same conclusion: that Joe Biden carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing. Trump administration officials have attested to these facts under oath. The NY Post never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story. They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani - whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported - claimed to have such materials."
- Andrew Bates, Joe Biden campaign spokesman
There is a categorical denial in there. Your post demonstrates one thing: people will believe whatever best suits their political interests, especially this close to an election.So, you're saying that Biden didn't document any corrupt meetings where he was negotiating bribes?
"That's enough for me.
And we're relying on the opinions expressed by people who weren't involved, in the face of leaked emails and the statement of the CEO of Hunter's company.
That's enough for me as well."
Oh... And I don't see a Biden denial in there, which is what you were responding to.
I think you are going to be disappointed in the way this turns out.There is a categorical denial in there. Your post demonstrates one thing: people will believe whatever best suits their political interests, especially this close to an election.
Rudy Giuliani has no credibility left on the subject of Joe Biden. Giuliani has been aggressively pursuing any dirt possible on Biden for over a year now... and whether or not that dirt is even truthful has not been a matter of significance to him.
Giuliani's word is good enough for you? Of course, it is... because he is saying what you wish to hear.
This doesnt mean the two never met. It means it wasn’t in the official scheduleThis statement released by the Joe Biden campaign was published in Politico.com on October 14, 2020 at 8:29 pm EDT, and it was included in a report written by Kyle Cheney and Natasha Bertrand:
POLITICO:
"We have reviewed Joe Biden's official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place. Investigations by the press, during impeachment, and even by two Republican-led Senate committees whose work was decried as 'not legitimate' and political by a GOP colleague have all reached the same conclusion: that Joe Biden carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing. Trump administration officials have attested to these facts under oath. The NY Post never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story. They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani - whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported - claimed to have such materials."
- Andrew Bates, Joe Biden campaign spokesman
There is a categorical denial in there. Your post demonstrates one thing: people will believe whatever best suits their political interests, especially this close to an election.
Rudy Giuliani has no credibility left on the subject of Joe Biden. Giuliani has been aggressively pursuing any dirt possible on Biden for over a year now... and whether or not that dirt is even truthful has not been a matter of significance to him.
Giuliani's word is good enough for you? Of course, it is... because he is saying what you wish to hear.
Rudy Giuliani has been so desperate to come up with dirt on Joe Biden that his involvement in this taints the whole thing. Maybe if someone else had handled this alleged laptop of Hunter Biden's the story would have some sense of legitimacy to it. It has been well established that Giuliani has contacts with Russian agents who have peddled conspiracy theories about the Bidens. He has zero credibility and he is willing to advance stories that he knows are not true.I never said she would be locked up. I never said that Joe would. I'm just saying that I think you are going to be disappointed in the way this turns out.
Yes, it is, because Giuliani handled the "evidence". If there is incriminating material on this laptop, there is no way to know who put it there. It could have been Hunter Biden, or it could have been someone working on behalf of the Trump campaign, seeking to damage Biden's campaign. Giuliani's involvement in this is not only suspiciously convenient... it also calls into question whether or not this laptop has been tampered with while in Giuliani's custody.Point out Biden's denial in there. Again, that's what you were setting out to prove with this quote.
My post proves nothing of the sort. That's a basely attack with no proof whatsoever, as a matter of fact. It's just the opposite.
Attacking Rudy Giuliani isn't attacking the evidence. You took a mental short-cut on that. I've read the emails, the DNI has confirmed it's not foreign, and at least one of the recipients of the emails has confirmed their veracity, as well as Joe's guilt in the matter. He happened to be the CEO of the corp in question.
Try again. Start by dealing with the informatyyion on the table instead of just lashing out at me and Rudy.
No. Scratch that... As mentionoed, start by pointing out Biden's denial in your cut/paste. Then deal with the emails, that are being confirmed by knowledgable sources, who are on record, by name. (Or do you just respect unnamed sources? Remember?)