VolnJC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 26,989
- Likes
- 36,979
I haven't given up I just don't buy into the "poor me, it's a disease and I need pity" bit anymore. Eventually you need to own your decisions. I also have kids to think about and don't want them around that nonsense.Wow, I've misjudged you. I would hope that if I ever had an addiction issue, my family wouldn't give up on me.
No. I've seen you use some astounding things as punchlines, and now you're attempting to guilt people for this. lol
I haven't given up I just don't buy into the "poor me, it's a disease and I need pity" bit anymore. Eventually you need to own your decisions. I also have kids to think about and don't want them around that nonsense.
Enquirer was nominated for a Pulitzer and took down John Edward's National Enquirer Now Legit, According to Pulitzer Prize BoardIt is interesting that a tabloid was the vehicle chosen for dissemination. Maybe the National Inquirer was busy updating the Bat Boy story and couldn't take Rudy's call?
I just justified why I said it.weak.
You keep saying "no" that empathy is not a "card to be played" but you also keep failing to justify why you said it. Screeching "uR a tRoLl" isn't the backstop you think it is.
So it's really not about what I said, it's about you trying to dodge rationalizing how you can claim I'm trolling while holding the competing belief that I'm not trolling, because - who points to acting like a decent human as a troll?
Maybe you're the troll.
This forum is nothing if it's not a huge make fun of others opinions festival. This Q nonsense is such low hanging fruit, I feel morally obligated to take swipes at, not doing so IMO, would be nearly criminal. I guess my question for you would be, what makes this corner of the litter box so damn special that this fringe political belief is above ridicule?
This is rich. You mock everything and now we’re supposed to take this seriously?
It's the "someone". Go pay someone with some credibility to do it for you.Are you trying to posit that your Q beliefs are equivalent to the mocking an addict?
Your grousing about this in a forum that is an absolute battlefield of belief mocking, but when someone trots out decency - your going to cry about it?
News flash champ, 90% of the posts in this forum are derision.
I just justified why I said it.
It's possible for me to believe that empathy isn't a card that should be played, but to have also seen your history of posts here that have used some pretty low-life punch-lines as insults toward people, and thus find you completely capable of attempting to use it as such.
Especially when you still brag about seeing this place as troll-bait.
In the Q-thread, this forum is just a place to troll and ridicule others.
But in the Biden thread, you become a champion of empathy. lol
You're a crass troll that occasionally gets bent out of shape for some reason when someone points out that you're a troll. lol
You're not actually this dumb. I absolutely believe two things, neither of which are mutually exclusive:You made an ill advised argument about empathy being a "card", using what you think was a "troll" is a weak backstop. This given that it'd take a pretty bad troll to suggest human decency would be something that would be a good "troll."
You blew it and are now full ride or die with the "uRa TroLl" nonsense. It's not that you're calling me a troll, it's that your justification for it here is remarkably stupid.
I wouldn't be totally shocked if we found you passed out behind the wheel in a McDonalds drive-thru.Pretty sure Hunter isn't on VN, "hurting his feelings" isn't really the point.
Mocking drug addiction tells far more about the person using it as a punch line than the person being mocked.