2020 Presidential Race

Maybe they believe Joe's gonna win regardless of their campaigning style. I think someone in 2016 believed that also. Meanwhile, trumps doing 3 states today.
You can harken back to 2016 all you want to... the electoral college map didn't look like this 4 years ago. Joe Biden has a much larger safety net than Hillary Clinton did. Just like Hillary, Biden needs to win Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and New Hampshire.... BUT, he has many more states in play than Hillary Clinton did. Biden is also showing slight leads in Ohio, North Carolina, Florida, Arizona, Georgia and Iowa. Biden's path to 270 electoral college votes has many more scenarios than Hillary Clinton had 4 years ago. I don't see how anyone can credibly argue otherwise.
 
Maybe they believe Joe's gonna win regardless of their campaigning style. I think someone in 2016 believed that also. Meanwhile, trumps doing 3 states today.
Also like 2016
 
Dollar's recent direction points to Biden win

The recent direction of the U.S. dollar points to former Vice President Joe Biden defeating President Trump in the upcoming election, but a lot can change before Nov. 3.

The U.S. Dollar Index, which tracks the dollar against a basket of its peers, has climbed 0.9% since its July 31 close.

A weaker dollar in the three months ahead of the election typically favors the incumbent party while a stronger dollar has been good news for the challenging party, though the direction of the greenback has no real impact on who wins. Still, the index has correctly predicted seven of the last eight election winners when using that measure, according to Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial.

Dollar's recent direction points to Biden win
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Maybe they believe Joe's gonna win regardless of their campaigning style. I think someone in 2016 believed that also. Meanwhile, trumps doing 3 states today.

I think multiple things.

* They believe they are in the lead.
* They have their media surrogates working day and night.
* They are hoping Trump implodes or continues to speak off message.
* Their policy ideas are radical or they are trying to deceive voters so they remain non committal.
* They are trying to find ways to cheat as much as possible.
* Joe is a weak candidate and is a risk the more he is in public.
* Kamala is a weak choice for VP but they like racial politics.
* There is no demand to hear one of their rallys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
I think multiple things.

* They believe they are in the lead.
* They have their media surrogates working day and night.
* They are hoping Trump implodes or continues to speak off message.
* Their policy ideas are radical or they are trying to deceive voters so they remain non committal.
* They are trying to find ways to cheat as much as possible.
* Joe is a weak candidate and is a risk the more he is in public.
* Kamala is a weak choice for VP but they like racial politics.
* There is no demand to hear one of their rallys.

NM
 
I think multiple things.

* They believe they are in the lead.
* They have their media surrogates working day and night.
* They are hoping Trump implodes or continues to speak off message.
* Their policy ideas are radical or they are trying to deceive voters so they remain non committal.
* They are trying to find ways to cheat as much as possible.
* Joe is a weak candidate and is a risk the more he is in public.
* Kamala is a weak choice for VP but they like racial politics.
* There is no demand to hear one of their rallys.
I agree with all of these except for Kamala being a weak choice for VP. I think she will more than hold her own with Pence in their debate. Yes, for the most part the media is heavily in our corner... why not just let them do the heavy lifting?
 
You think this is a good thing. Which of these radical policies are you most in favor of?

I just gave some possible reasons they have run a lackadaisical campaign. Radical ideas are for the most leftist voters but or they are trying to play as moderates. When you are scared to announce your positions then you don't if you think you can get away with it.
 
I agree with all of these except for Kamala being a weak choice for VP. I think she will more than hold her own with Pence in their debate. Yes, for the most part the media is heavily in our corner... why not just let them do the heavy lifting?
I'm gonna agree with you I think Kamala was a good choice...she's more of a bulldog candidate compared to Rice
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
I just gave some possible reasons they have run a lackadaisical campaign. Radical ideas are for the most leftist voters but or they are trying to play as moderates. When you are scared to announce your positions then you don't if you think you can get away with it.
Gotcha
 
I agree with all of these except for Kamala being a weak choice for VP. I think she will more than hold her own with Pence in their debate. Yes, for the most part the media is heavily in our corner... why not just let them do the heavy lifting?

I say Kamala is a weak candidate because she is not well liked. She has the personality of a rock. She was one of the first put "out" during the primaries and did not attract minority voters or women. She is the Obama's choice. That is the only reason she was chosen. Biden doesn't need her for California. She is a real leftist though according to most.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I say Kamala is a weak candidate because she is not well liked. She has the personality of a rock. She was one of the first putnin the primaries and did not attract minority voters or women. She is the Obama's choice. That is the only reason she was chosen. Biden doesn't need her for California. She is a real leftist though according to most.
There is a strong possibility you will be calling her Madam President in the next four years. Just remember that. LOL.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top