ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 21,973
- Likes
- 43,550
What about the part of the community that is disappearing due to these insane rules..... I believe individual make the choice of what is important to them..... That will in turn make a better, stronger community.Again, if you don’t understand or value the concept of community then that’s up to you.
Epidemiology=feelings
That’s a new one. Look, you clearly don’t understand and/or want to participate in the actual subject matter here, and that’s fine. Launching some vague, misguided rant doesn’t make me look silly, it makes you look silly.
Yes, kind of.
The goal IS herd immunity just achieved artificially instead of naturally to reduce loss of life. The problem will likely be that COVID will be with us forever, have some kind of seasonality and antibodies from the vaccine won’t remain permanently effective, so we’ll end up having to get a covid shot once or twice per year.
What about the part of the community that is disappearing due to these insane rules..... I believe individual make the choice of what is important to them..... That will in turn make a better, stronger community.
Me thinks the idea of personal responsibility vs shared responsibility escapes most of you.He is 100% right. You want to hold others responsible for your protection against a virus regardless of what economic impact it has on them or their families.
You sir are the selfish self-centered one in this conversation.
There's no irony in my post. You're the one that started the name-calling. Now you're getting it back, except you're genuinely wrong.Irony... wonder if you understand that concept?
Me thinks the idea of personal responsibility vs shared responsibility escapes most of you.
Someone killing themselves over finances, is more of a mental health issue. But that is my opinion. Money comes and goes. If that was the straw that broke the camels back, then there were other underlying mental health issues.Community.
I know as many people in my close community that have killed themselves over adverse economic impacts (1) as have had the virus confirmed (1). If I want to act in the interest of my community, the science would say I should encourage non-at risk people to get the economy back going and at-risk people to stay at home.
You're too busy trying to throw around science words and your one-sided feelings-centric opinion to consider that situations may be different for people that aren't you. Selfishness embodied.
There's no irony in my post. You're the one that started the name-calling. Now you're getting it back, except you're genuinely wrong.
I notice you've elected not to respond to my community post. Is it because you have no ground to stand on? The answer is yes.
The two go hand in hand. If you cannot afford food and shelter your physical well-being is in far more danger than from covid.
Don't you understand epidemiology?
