LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 51,626
- Likes
- 49,557
Of course you can say that. For me, exploring which deaths are worse is futile. Because No one has yet proven that DJT's response is worse than any other. We can conclude certain governors have had better/worse responses, though.technically the drug addict didn't choose death - just took risks so only 1 person in the scenario intentionally ended their life
the larger point is that all the lives mattered (can I say that?) and caused grief to friends and family
Of course you can say that. For me, exploring which deaths are worse is futile. Because No one has yet proven that DJT's response is worse than any other. We can conclude certain governors have had better/worse responses, though.
Looks like I left where I was at just in time. Talked with the granddaughter of my patient who works there. They had to shut down an entire floor because of covid19 in workers and pts on a non covid floor. Pts previously tested negative popped positive after being on that floor. The entire staff was off for 2 weeks.Well a mini-outbreak has hit us here 20+ patients and close to 10 staff.
If titansvolsfaninga is going to make a claim that the response could have been better and prevented deaths, then he will have to make a case based on comparisons. Speculating isn't going to cut it.
At this point, all I can say with complete conviction is: I wouldn't wanted to live in a large city in the Northeast, or in a nursing home and be vulnerable to covid 19.
Trump presidency, his response, his tweets, and his verbiage didn't do anything to effect cities or nursing homes. And no one else would have made a difference, either....excluding Cuomo's monumental bungle.
What?? Pre-existing conditions are what lead to people catching whatever comes down the road. If they have the big 5 ( hypertension, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, chronic lung disease) they are targets for any bug or virus because they are compromised. I'll add another, immunocompromised. You should probably look some stuff up.Exactly.....you talking like you are ok with 190K dead. Those are a lot families affected by death. There is nothing after death. Ain't no do overs. A pre-existing condition should not be a death sentence for anyone. Pandemic or not.
Unfortunately, we can't go back in time a recreate the Pandemic. We can only base it off of what a person would do. You can agree that the left agreed that masks and handwashing was a good thing to do. Right?
Exactly, the reasons people even get really sick or die at ALL from COVID are because of the above you mentioned.What?? Pre-existing conditions are what lead to people catching whatever comes down the road. If they have the big 5 ( hypertension, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, chronic lung disease) they are targets for any bug or virus because they are compromised. I'll add another, immunocompromised. You should probably look some stuff up.
This was the discussion...
The bolded was true then and is still true today.
It was drama filled fear peddling nonsense. Everyone, even then, knew it wasn't really 7%, but you were on here selling it.
What did I sell? I was passing along information, it’s up to you to do with it what you will. We have a president that can’t get through 2 (fragmented) sentences without a lie yet many on here are willing to look past it without question... yet I give real information and you get your feathers ruffled because you don’t like it? If you don’t like it, prove it wrong, don’t shoot the messenger.
By the way, that dude has accused me all long of predicting that the virus would have a 7% death rate... show me where in that conversation I conveyed that?
Projecting I see. Thought your memory was fine, guess not.