American war dead are "Losers and Suckers," per Trump

Because it’s mostly media background noise and the media has attacked him non-stop since 2015.

Why do you continue to believe the media’s reporting and narratives when they are so obviously biased against Trump?

90+ percent negative stories for an entire presidency is unprecedented. It’s just not normal.

Ever think about it and ask yourself why?
"Biased" doesn't necessarily mean "false". I don't think there is any question that The Washington Post had an agenda against the Nixon Administration in the early to mid 70's for a number of reasons. Ben Bradlee, the WAPO editor, was high on Nixon's famous "enemies list" and he knew it. Of course he wanted his reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, to take Nixon down. However, that doesn't mean that what Woodward and Bernstein reported on the Watergate break-in and cover up, was false. You can be biased and still do good, fact-based reporting.

... and the stories and reporting on the George W. Bush administration were just as negative. GWB didn't complain as much. That is the only difference. Try and find a positive story from either The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN or MSNBC on the Bush presidency from 2004-2008. You can't do it. So, it's hardly "unprecedented". Trump is just whining more than most Republicans do. Trump loves to present himself as a victim, and his supporters are eager to lap that up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
Do you honestly think Trump is the most qualified candidate? IMO, he is either willfully ignorant or completely incompetent of how the government works, and how to incorporate or even communicate his policies. I watched the speeches from the RNC and many of them just fear mongered on how bad Biden’s America would be. There wasn’t much talk about policy or how we would deliver on anything in the next 4 years.

I don’t get the rationale of Trump supporters so trying to understand. And concerning the comments in the report, they basically corroborate public statements he’s made in the past. Hell he talked about grabbing women by the pussy and numerous other comments before the election and no one cares.

I mean you can tell just by watching the Apprentice that he’s a dumbass. I don’t get it.

Neither are qualified. Neither have provided much in policy.

I'm not a Trump supporter nor am I a Trump hater.

If I had my wish neither would be POTUS for the next 4 years.

Of the 2, the policies likely to be enacted under Trump are slightly more palatable to me. That's it.
 
"Biased" doesn't necessarily mean "false". I don't think there is any question that The Washington Post had an agenda against the Nixon Administration in the early to mid 70's for a number of reasons. Ben Bradlee, the WAPO editor, was high on Nixon's famous "enemies list" and he knew it. Of course he wanted his reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, to take Nixon down. However, that doesn't mean that what Woodward and Bernstein reported on the Watergate break-in and cover up, was false. You can be biased and still do good, fact-based reporting.

... and the stories and reporting on the George W. Bush administration were just as negative. GWB didn't complain as much. That is the only difference. Try and find a positive story from either The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN or MSNBC on the Bush presidency from 2004-2008. You can't do it. So, it's hardly "unprecedented". Trump is just whining more than most Republicans do. Trump loves to present himself as a victim, and his supporters are eager to lap that up.
You can’t even be honest with yourself. Pointless to try to have a meaningful conversation.
 
If Biden’s team is responsible for the ad, probably 3 weeks based on all other media they’ve put out in 2020.

Is it libelous if this can be proven false?

I doubt it. Sarah Palin, ironically, is about the only public figure I know of with a libel case that seems winnable.

You realize you’d potentially be liable to a number of people under any standard that would make Biden liable to Trump, right?
 
And apparently, you can't explain what was false.
Your assertion that Nixon and GWB had as bad or worse treatment by the media is ludicrous.

You can’t even admit what’s happening. I’m guessing it’s because you agree with the media and enjoy the negative coverage.
 
I doubt it. Sarah Palin, ironically, is about the only public figure I know of with a libel case that seems winnable.

You realize you’d potentially be liable to a number of people under any standard that would make Biden liable to Trump, right?
No I didn’t. That’s why I asked.

You don’t ever get off your legal high horse, huh?

Sometimes people ask questions because they really don’t know.
 
Your assertion that Nixon and GWB had as bad or worse treatment by the media is ludicrous.

You can’t even admit what’s happening. I’m guessing it’s because you agree with the media and end the negative coverage.
They did. Nixon complained a lot too. GWB mostly rolled with the punches. He had a much thicker skin than Trump does. Do you remember the Dan Rather/Mary Mapes scandal produced by the CBS show "48 Hours" involving George W. Bush's service in the National Guard in 2004?
 
Dems: powerful statement from Biden

Republicans: Old dotard flubbed the word "backbone."
 
They did. Nixon complained a lot too. GWB mostly rolled with the punches. He had a much thicker skin than Trump does.
Like I said. You can’t be honest with yourself.

Too young to remember Nixon, but GWB was given a pass through nearly his entire first term after 9/11

They piled on GWB in his 2nd term. Katrina was a big story in 2005.
 
Dems: powerful statement from Biden

Republicans: Old dotard flubbed the word "backbone."

That's what they want to ask the Dem nominee for potus? You finally get him in front of a mic and that's what he had to answer? Undecided voters should be livid with this coverage (so should Dems if they were honest about it)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
That's what they want to ask the Dem nominee for potus? You finally get him in front of a mic and that's what he had to answer? Undecided voters should be livid with this coverage (so should Dems if they were honest about it)
He seemed prepared for the question IMO.
 
No I didn’t. That’s why I asked.

You don’t ever get off your legal high horse, huh?

Sometimes people ask questions because they really don’t know.

My bad, I guess all the reposting of baseless pedophilia accusations caused me to momentarily forget your outrage at all the arguably defamatory statements made by Trump or his campaign.
 
Thank goodness for the new and citizen media debunked this early..combating the fake media and the useful idiots like EL will be a 247 job until election day
 
Like I said. You can’t be honest with yourself.

Too young to remember Nixon, but GWB was given a pass through nearly his entire first term after 9/11

They piled on GWB in his 2nd term. Katrina was a big story in 2005.
The Dan Rather/48 Hours scandal was in 2004 in the heat of GWB's re-election campaign. Sorry, but you are wrong. The heat that Trump is facing as a Republican president is not "unprecedented".
 
My bad, I guess all the reposting of baseless pedophilia accusations caused me to momentarily forget your outrage at all the arguably defamatory statements made by Trump or his campaign.
Because having anonymous conversations on a college football fan message board is exactly the same as a campaign ad for POTUS.

You’re such a weenie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Advertisement





Back
Top