American war dead are "Losers and Suckers," per Trump

#77
#77
BowlBrother85 said:
You do realize that the Access Hollywood video that was made public in October of 2016 had actually been filmed 10 years earlier, don't you? That is really not so strange in the world of politics, especially just before an election.
Click to expand...

You mean the same leftist media that rushed to do same day outrage over 2 scoops of ice cream sat on a story like this for 2 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, hjeagle1vol and Rickyvol77
#80
#80
NorthDallas40 said:
Just for once. Just for one damn time why don’t you actually get one on the record under oath and then we can talk.

The last one you did that with, the “whistleblower”, absolutely withered under questioning.

Trump is a lousy person from what I can tell. Yet you girls continue to swing and miss on these hit jobs. Not even a damn foul tip.

Get em on record girl!
Click to expand...
We just now hear this? This is BS. I would say I will be glad when election season is over, but it will not stop. Boy, or girl in this case Can only cry wolf so many times
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, ajvol01, volfanjustin and 1 other person
#81
#81
TNVOLNAVY said:
You mean the same leftist media that rushed to do same day outrage over 2 scoops of ice cream sat on a story like this for 2 years?
Click to expand...
No, I mean the "grab em by the pu$$y" video which was filmed in 2005, but wasn't released until just before the election in 2016.
 
#82
#82
TNVOLNAVY said:
You mean the same leftist media that rushed to do same day outrage over 2 scoops of ice cream sat on a story like this for 2 years?
Click to expand...
Or the same media that cropped photos to frame a privileged white kid for mocking a native american war hero? Or the same media that ran with whistleblower unnamed sources that then had to testify they were stating hearsay and assumption once under oath? Or the media that...

It's no longer journalism and the American public isn't stupid. The only people that pay it any mind are the emotional wrecks that NEED to hear daily that orange man is bad, NEED everyone to agree with them, and NEED to be convinced that he'll never make a second term.

This is the stench of panic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and StarRaider
#83
#83
BowlBrother85 said:
Consistent? Yes, it means compatible, steady, unchanging in nature. That is consistent with how Trump speaks. He calls people losers all the time. It is consistent with the way he has spoken about veterans in the past.
Click to expand...
And I posted just a couple examples to suggest otherwise - ie not steady or unchanging. But it doesn’t matter. You will believe literally anything if it reaffirms your beliefs. Again I don’t understand how you Dems believe MUH unnamed sources without any bit of skepticism despite one of the biggest hoaxes in political history being played out on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and ajvol01
#84
#84
This goes to my earlier post that the left has no ideology other than pursuit of more power...EL jumps on anonymous sources when it fits her agenda when she was the major one defending the "Anti Semite of the Year" in the Omar thread...she's a troll and not even a very good one Ilhan Omar voted 2019's antisemite of the year
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#85
#85
BowlBrother85 said:
No, I mean the "grab em by the pu$$y" video which was filmed in 2005, but wasn't released until just before the election in 2016.
Click to expand...

621bc613ece585f6504c7b825b399060.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Behr and StarRaider
#87
#87
Tyler Durden said:
Pot meet kettle.
Click to expand...
Except my track record is 1000x what yours is. I don’t fall for unsubstantiated hoaxes like Russia collusion or that Brett Kavanaugh is a serial rapist. You’re the dolt who did. Maybe you should reconsider your knee-jerk reactions in the future if you want to have any shred of credibility
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb, Behr, Orangeburst and 2 others
#88
#88
luthervol said:
Speaking of losing votes; here are the first 3 paragraphs from a letter that the State School Superintendent (conservative Kemp guy) sent out to educators.

September 3, 2020 – This morning, Chief State School Officers received a letter from Secretary Betsy DeVos stating that the U.S. Department of Education does not plan to grant federal testing waivers for the 2020-21 school year.

The exact wording of the letter was: “You should not anticipate such waivers being granted again.”

I have to be completely candid with my thoughts on this decision. It is disappointing, shows a complete disconnect with the realities of the classroom, and will be a detriment to public education.

DeVos is horrible at her job.

Believe it or not, a lot of people in public education are conservative. They are fleeing from Trump in droves.
Click to expand...
You are so full of it lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and volfanjustin
#89
#89
NorthDallas40 said:
Just for once. Just for one damn time why don’t you actually get one on the record under oath and then we can talk.

The last one you did that with, the “whistleblower”, absolutely withered under questioning.

Trump is a lousy person from what I can tell. Yet you girls continue to swing and miss on these hit jobs. Not even a damn foul tip.

Get em on record girl!
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? The whistleblower was presumed to be Eric Ciaramella, but he was never questioned in public.
 
#90
#90
BowlBrother85 said:
No, I mean the "grab em by the pu$$y" video which was filmed in 2005, but wasn't released until just before the election in 2016.
Click to expand...

You have two recordings one of him talking about that and one of him talking about McCain but we can’t come up with a single name willing to go on record about this ? I mean we are still waiting on Bob Woodwards recordings he said he’d give to anybody that asked for them . Then we have Omarosa’s recordings we are waiting on , then there’s Tom Arnold who swears there’s re or sings of Trump saying racist things . I mean really how gullible are you guys ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#93
#93
BowlBrother85 said:
What are you talking about? The whistleblower was presumed to be Eric Ciaramella, but he was never questioned in public.
Click to expand...
I am referring to the non anonymous whistle blower Vindman whom wilted under questioning not the chicken **** anonymous one whom never had to back up their accusations. And you knew that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and Orange_Crush
#100
#100
golfballs said:
And I posted just a couple examples to suggest otherwise - ie not steady or unchanging. But it doesn’t matter. You will believe literally anything if it reaffirms your beliefs. Again I don’t understand how you Dems believe MUH unnamed sources without any bit of skepticism despite one of the biggest hoaxes in political history being played out on you.
Click to expand...
Because they want to believe. It’s that simple.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top