tennesseeduke
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Messages
- 8,228
- Likes
- 8,567
So when a plane crashes we stop flying? When someone dies of a heart attack we stop playing? When someone dies of old age we stop aging?Soyou believe in lett9ng people die with no attempt to prevent and save infection and death. i f you are a physician, you took an oath to protect and cure people to the best of youyr ability. While it is true that people will die someday, people in the medical fiel msut do everything possible to prevent, treat and cure adverse medical conditions when ever possible.
Yeah because not testing will make it go away...
Quite the opposite, actually. The lockdown has caused an incalculable amount of suffering and death, as well -- suicide, delayed diagnosis/treatment, poverty, hunger, mental health disorders, etc. Also, I am quite certain that mortality from CV19 infection will increase if we don't approach herd immunity before flu/respiratory season. Hospitals are always at capacity mid-winter, and they could very well become overburdened this year.Soyou believe in lett9ng people die with no attempt to prevent and save infection and death. i f you are a physician, you took an oath to protect and cure people to the best of youyr ability. While it is true that people will die someday, people in the medical fiel msut do everything possible to prevent, treat and cure adverse medical conditions when ever possible.
Testing positive and someone actually having it is starting to be a problem. We hear about all these new cases while them being asymptomatic. I'm now thinking these tests aren't actually accurate at all.I just don't see how we are going to be able to complete the season. I want football to be played as bad as anyone. But, I just don't see how. I mean if you have a game on Saturday and you have 15 starters test positive. There is no way you are going to have a chance to win the game. What type of a win or loss is it when you beat someone with most of their starters out do to this Covid crap? Do we just count this season or what we play of it as practice games?
Soyou believe in lett9ng people die with no attempt to prevent and save infection and death. i f you are a physician, you took an oath to protect and cure people to the best of youyr ability. While it is true that people will die someday, people in the medical fiel msut do everything possible to prevent, treat and cure adverse medical conditions when ever possible.
The vaccine is more likely to be short lived, like the flu vaccine, than the polio vaccine. Jmo. Besides, do we even have a vaccine available? Not to my knowledge.
If you know of one, please post a link. I really enjoy reading about these things. And not the trial ones, ive read all those. Im looking for the one that’s been proven and ready for distribution, where clinical results have proven it works.
Maybe within the next month they will listen to the CDC and not test people unless they have symptoms so we can forget about it all.
My own non-medical opinion is that there are three kinds of people in this world: 1. Those who have already had C19, 2. Those who have it now, and 3. Those who will catch it. It's a virus. It's not going anywhere.
All the lock downs and shutdowns simply prolong the inevitable. Attention must be paid to make sure hospitals don't get overwhelmed, and the particularly vulnerable need to be protected. But otherwise life should go on.
But, given the current political and social climate regarding the virus, particularly among college administrators, my bet is that the season gets cancelled before it gets underway.
No consistent testing is driving the fear train and holding up progress. If someone isn’t sick there is no reason to test.
Sweden: coronavirus cases by age | StatistaYou call that article weak, but it was based off medical research. The statements made were from medical research. The quotes the article used to summarize the study were verbatim from the study. Nothing weak about that. Also I double checked and not one contributor was from the WHO. The Royal Society of Medicine is funded by the people and donations. The review process of journal entries and publications is conducted Internally by members of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Also the Netherlands has 17.28 million people.
Sweden as 10 mil
The other countries you downplayed have 5 mil each. So they’re all statistically the different in size.
Yet when you even the playing field by reporting in per million people (pmp) Sweden is only behind the UK in deaths pmp out of all the countries you mentioned and the medical community mentioned. The UK has 30 million people btw.
Please post the link to your statistics so I can read them myself. I really enjoy reading this type of stuff.
And the vast majority of the elderly percent of them aren't dying either, so what's your point. The vast overwhelming majority that have sadly died are in nursing homes. And many of them got listed as dying with covid even if they had terminal cancer or other things. They need to be keeping elderly with conditions away from the dangers more than anything. As a society we can't stay inside forever, it's time to open and continue to monitor and tell the elderly that have conditions to stay away from any potential crowds that may get them infected. Again the VAST 99 percent that get it are going to get a virus for a few days and it's gone. Some never even know they have it. Most all countries are opening up, some regrettably just don't want us to open up period, but most people have had enough of the madness and misinformation. We know the elderly need to be protected, but as a free society we must continue to move forward. Things are opening up, pray to Jesus for the number to continue to go down and use common sense. But shame on the folks leading fear and misleading statements on covid. Hopefully in a few more months between the plasma and finding a vaccine we will further destroy the covid into oblivion. This too shall pass. GBO and God Bless!Except for the person they give it to who could be very vulnerable to it, I don’t understand why that is so hard for some of you to grasp. Most athletes aren’t going to die from it, that is a given, but their parents or grandparents might which is the whole point of being able to trace it. Some of you possess zero logical thinking skills
Its funny you say that. I have been going to a Cardiologist for a couple months now due to heart complications from Covid. So it has thrust me into doing a lot of research. I have also met with 30 cardiologists ove that time due to the rare nature of my current condition. I will have surgery soon btw.
The point I am trying to get to is that they all have given me recommendations for medical journals. I have read quite a few. Also 29/30 of those doctors, 2 graduated from Harvard medical school, say we need to quasi-lock down, wear masks to protect the people surrounding us, and social distance to drive this thing down.
My own non-medical opinion is that there are three kinds of people in this world: 1. Those who have already had C19, 2. Those who have it now, and 3. Those who will catch it. It's a virus. It's not going anywhere.
All the lock downs and shutdowns simply prolong the inevitable. Attention must be paid to make sure hospitals don't get overwhelmed, and the particularly vulnerable need to be protected. But otherwise life should go on.
But, given the current political and social climate regarding the virus, particularly among college administrators, my bet is that the season gets cancelled before it gets underway.
I'm not saying that, at all. I'm saying that locking down only delays the inevitable and causes MASSIVE collateral damage.”
When someone presents (exclusively) one side of an argument across multiple conversations, it becomes difficult to believe that your cause is objectivity. In every COVID-19 related thread you’ve presented cherry-picked subsets of data in a highly manipulative fashion. Pretending otherwise, strains credulity. Your collage of data on mask usage is highly-biased, and ignores mainstream science on the matter. Your original position on shutdowns stated that communities that shutdown fared much worse than those that did not. Your argument was made as a doctor, but now you’re claiming other “collateral damage”. Is the damage economic, psychological? What’s your expertise in those fields? The danger of course is not that you’re some simpleton at the gas station presenting these biased opinions, but that you’re in a position of power and influence in in an area of public health. That makes your claims all the more dangerous. The data isn't particularly ambiguous on these topics, but you’re doing your best to sow doubt anyway. Being in your position, I find that particularly reckless.
Except for the person they give it to who could be very vulnerable to it, I don’t understand why that is so hard for some of you to grasp. Most athletes aren’t going to die from it, that is a given, but their parents or grandparents might which is the whole point of being able to trace it. Some of you possess zero logical thinking skills
Any medical person who tries to minimize COVID is in a small minority of doctors and researchers and their opinions should be ignored.
Are these doctors also factoring in things outside their control like increases in suicide, hunger, abuse, etc. How about the economic devastation caused by a shutdown and how that affects physical/mental/ emotional health?I see three doctors at Vanderbilt, and all three say the same thing as your doctors. Any medical person who tries to minimize COVID is in a small minority of doctors and researchers and their opinions should be ignored.