Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#74,128
#74,128
tntar heel said:
We've lost 2 huge pines and 2 tangelo trees to lightning in last 3 years. Pleasures of living in the Tampa Bay.
Click to expand...

We live at the beach in SC. Our house and our two neighbors’ homes were struck by lightning last week. We were here when it happened - scared me, the husband and the dog half to death.

All three houses lost their HVACs and irrigation systems, and two of us lost home entertainment systems. It also fried our golf cart charger. Making lemonade out of lemons - I ordered a 75-inch Samsung to replace my older TV. If we have football, it’s going to look great in this house!
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, 37L1, joevol33 and 4 others
#74,131
#74,131
BeardedVol said:
Right, cause you are pretending that China didn't have a draconian lockdown of their country from February to April, and then spent the last 4 months opening back up, by literally tracking all of their citizens' movements?

Does beg the question though, are we hiding the 177,889 Americans who are pretending to be dead to further the hoax, in China?

Think about it, a lot of empty land out there in the west now that they've incarcerated a million or so Uighurs.
Click to expand...
Can you subtract the number of deaths from the 4 blue state Governors shoving sick covid patients in nursing homes before posting a "death" total?

Thanks. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol and 10nacvols
#74,133
#74,133
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky_Top_Vol13, Orange_Vol1321, Orangeburst and 4 others
#74,140
#74,140
DancingOutlaw said:
Who's going to buy the building?
Click to expand...
No idea. That’ll be the question for a lot of companies. There’s a chance we could see commercial real estate prices tumble as the market is flooded with capacity. At some point, though, if pricing does fall it would likely reach a point where companies would snatch it up. I’d guess a lot of companies might not go 100% remote but hoteling might become more prevalent. We do that now in most cities. Our studies showed that real estate was only at 70% capacity so why not shed that 30% extra real estate? We saved somewhere close to $1B by hoteling.
 
#74,141
#74,141
evillawyer said:
Click to expand...


Certainly (once again).

Several other age cohorts were close to 30%. No herd immunity yet, but not nearly as many susceptible hosts as what the city had in March. And clearly with the March and April deaths, this virus was running rampant then. Way more cases than were reported, due to poor testing capabilities.
Click to expand...

1) It has been demonstrated multiple times that a) herd immunity appears to be reached at a much lower threshold than initially expected (c 20% in many areas), and b) seroprevalence of antibody is not the only (or even primary) determining factor.

2) The reason there is a much higher antibody presence than known "cases" is that the VAST majority of people exposed have mild to no symptoms, thus are never tested. Knowing what we do about the PCR, there is now plenty of justification to actually DECREASE testing.

Obviously, both of the above points should be good news to us all, so it baffles me that a few posters continue to ignore the science and peddle fear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, hUTch2002, 37L1 and 4 others
#74,142
#74,142
ohhbother said:
We live at the beach in SC. Our house and our two neighbors’ homes were struck by lightning last week. We were here when it happened - scared me, the husband and the dog half to death.

All three houses lost their HVACs and irrigation systems, and two of us lost home entertainment systems. It also fried our golf cart charger. Making lemonade out of lemons - I ordered a 75-inch Samsung to replace my older TV. If we have football, it’s going to look great in this house!
Click to expand...
And to think all I got out of the ordeal was citrus wood for the smoker!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#74,144
#74,144
kiddiedoc said:
Certainly (once again).



1) It has been demonstrated multiple times that a) herd immunity appears to be reached at a much lower threshold than initially expected (c 20% in many areas), and b) seroprevalence of antibody is not the only (or even primary) determining factor.

2) The reason there is a much higher antibody presence than known "cases" is that the VAST majority of people exposed have mild to no symptoms, thus are never tested. Knowing what we do about the PCR, there is now plenty of justification to actually DECREASE testing.

Obviously, both of the above points should be good news to us all, so it baffles me that a few posters continue to ignore the science and peddle fear.
Click to expand...

I believe it’s because they can’t let the political aspect of it go . It shouldnt be political it’s just a virus . It is , what it is ...regardless of which way it goes .
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#74,145
#74,145
kiddiedoc said:
Certainly (once again).




2) The reason there is a much higher antibody presence than known "cases" is that the VAST majority of people exposed have mild to no symptoms, thus are never tested. Knowing what we do about the PCR, there is now plenty of justification to actually DECREASE testing.
Click to expand...
Oh lawd, then Dems would be screaming that he's trying to manipulate covid data.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top