2020 Presidential Race

#42,901
#42,901
DC_Vol said:
You are missing out.
Click to expand...

Apparently.

Seriously, I have been reading these references to Luther and I haven't paid attention to the show ignored situation... I have plenty of invalids to deal with currently, not sure if I want the add to the pile.
 
#42,902
#42,902
DC_Vol said:
How did you go from looking for a Goldwater-esque candidate in 2016 to Biden / Harris in 2020?
Click to expand...
Look at the state of the Republican Party and the Conservative movement right now. I want someone to right the ship and Trump Pence can’t do that. Their supporters wanted to burn the system to the ground. Well they have and it have and look where we are now. Republicans and conservatives have moved away from Goldwater, Reagan, and H.W Bush and embraced Trumpism with a mix of Le Pen nationalism. The country is changing and the GOP and conservatives failed to change with it. The change to have done that was in 2016. Just look at who the Republicans elected in Georgia’ 14th District. A woman who has a history of making racist, anti-Semitic and Islamophobic comments & posting about Q and the QAnon conspiracy movement. If that the way the party is moving I’m not going to be apart of it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JCP201, bnhunt and zeppelin128
#42,903
#42,903
hjeagle1vol said:
OMG is that phone upside down lol? He's completely incompetent. If he's not mentally limited, then he's a complete dolt.
#dncclownshow
Click to expand...

You can actually read the printed script.

“I think you are entitled to know why I chose you. There are three reasons...”

EfKzL4rXgAA3eDP
 
#42,905
#42,905
Offset Eye said:
Welp! Apparently I had exactly one dude on IGNORE... and guess who it was. This is priceless. At some point long ago, I recognized that luther was epic levels of off balance and I put him on Ignore. I mean, you gotta be space-case moron for me to put you on Ignore. Flicka is close, but I have fun hammering him for now. I might promote luther for a minute to see how he has progressed.
Click to expand...

Oh hes progressive.

But he isn't an a hole like crayola kitty.
 
#42,906
#42,906
volfanhill said:
An article from the New Yorker proves I am wrong? Oh ok.
Click to expand...
There is a nice little feedback button underneath. Let me know if you get it changed.

In the meantime, I expect you to flip your lid the next time you go for a withdrawal at the bank and they don't just hand you all the money in your account.

Reduce implies funding is not cut entirely, remove/withdraw do not describe the amount taken at all.
 
#42,907
#42,907
Ten_Titans said:
This is the article cited by the dictionary, indicating that "defund the police" uses this context.

Can Minneapolis Dismantle Its Police Department?



I'm sorry, you're wrong.
Click to expand...
Let’s, for a second agree that you are correct, where the hell is the controversy then? Is it controversial to say I am going to reduce spending in the military on a national level or the police on a local one? Do people even look at our debt/and continued deficits. Slash the **** out of them. My last sentence could be viewed as controversial. But I prefer it over my grandkids in breadlines.
 
#42,909
#42,909
ajvol01 said:
You can actually read the printed script.

“I think you are entitled to know why I chose you. There are three reasons...”

EfKzL4rXgAA3eDP
Click to expand...
Wait are you saying a politician had a staffer write a script for him to read to someone? Say it ain't so.
 
#42,910
#42,910
volfanhill said:
Let’s, for a second agree that you are correct, where the hell is the controversy then? Is it controversial to say I am going to reduce spending in the military on a national level or the police on a local one? Do people even look at our debt/and continued deficits. Slash the **** out of them. My last sentence could be viewed as controversial. But I prefer it over my grandkids in breadlines.
Click to expand...
Reducing the funding for police is very controversial for me. It's like the 1 government program I like.

The military, no, not so much. I'm with you. I'm for defunding(my version) all sorts of government spending. Police is not one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#42,913
#42,913
AirVol said:
After thinking about it, yeah it’s Trumps fault for winning in 2016. You guys still can’t accept it. So yeah, people finally snapped and started riots and burning sh!t.
Click to expand...
Not his fault for "winning", but everything that's happened since then pretty much is.
 
#42,925
#42,925
carlos86 said:
Look at the state of the Republican Party and the Conservative movement right now. I want someone to right the ship and Trump Pence can’t do that. Their supporters wanted to burn the system to the ground. Well they have and it have and look where we are now. Republicans and conservatives have moved away from Goldwater, Reagan, and H.W Bush and embraced Trumpism with a mix of Le Pen nationalism. The country is changing and the GOP and conservatives failed to change with it. The change to have done that was in 2016. Just look at who the Republicans elected in Georgia’ 14th District. A woman who has a history of making racist, anti-Semitic and Islamophobic comments & posting about Q and the QAnon conspiracy movement. If that the way the party is moving I’m not going to be apart of it.
Click to expand...

Well here is some B.S.

Tell us about the state of the Republican Party from your perspective. Also, were you alive in 1984? If so, what was your age? Thanks.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top