2020 Presidential Race

Except she actually did do it. What the right wants to accept is also up to them
LOL. You really don't know that. You are drawing conclusions with very little information, mostly online speculation and gossip, from people who are predisposed to not liking her anyway, either from an ideological standpoint, or because they would rather see someone else be selected as Joe Biden's running mate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bnhunt
I'm not seeing the problem here. You said that she is a terrible prosecutor. If so, she found another way to get where she wanted to be. I probably wouldn't go that route,but who am I to judge other than with my vote
If that's the kind of party they want then good for them. Not the type of person I would ever support
 
LOL. You really don't know that. You are drawing conclusions with very little information, mostly online speculation and gossip, from people who are predisposed to not liking her anyway, either from an ideological standpoint, or because they would rather see someone else be selected as Joe Biden's running mate.
It's speculation she had a relationship with a much older politician who then appointed her to multiple, well paying positions that she wasn't qualified for (which she skipped a lot of the time)?
 
It's speculation she had a relationship with a much older politician who then appointed her to multiple, well paying positions (which she skipped a lot of the time)?
It is only speculation that Willie Brown appointed her to career advancements because of a relationship. Her credentials were inline with the positions she has held.
 
Not it is not. There is an antagonistic element to racism. This is an example of proactively including a portion of the population (black women) who have never been selected for this particular job before (VP).

To make a decision concerning people and using their race in the decision, is racism.

That it doesnt fit well with your narrative would be your ignorance.
 
It is only speculation that Willie Brown appointed her to career advancements because of a relationship. Her credentials were inline with the positions she has held.
They actually weren't. She did not have experience in either area. Maybe why she skipped it a lot

It's not speculation if you're honest with yourself
 
To make a decision concerning people and using their race in the decision, is racism.

That it doesnt fit well with your narrative would be your ignorance.
No it isn't. Racism is antagonistic in nature. It's discriminatory, but not all acts of discrimination are examples of racism.
 
So if I choose to only hire white people to do work at my house and business, I am not racist?
That would depend on your motivation behind this. You are obviously being discriminatory, but not necessarily racist. If your motive behind only hiring white people to work in your home, is an animus against blacks or Latinos or Asians then yes... that is racism. There has to be an antagonistic element.
 
Or that the Dem party only deems you worthy if they exclude all others from consideration.

But you're our first choice, I swear
I think Harris was the front runner from the get go. Many were saying it during the primaries.
 
No. That would depend on your motivation behind this. You are obviously being discriminatory, but not necessarily racist.

Quite the knots you're tying.

My motivation, which you claim now would be the defining matter here towards my racism or lack thereof, can exist without antagonizing anyone.

So now you've tripped over your first nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Power T-Rev
Advertisement

Back
Top