USAFgolferVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2019
- Messages
- 7,140
- Likes
- 3,652
It’s really not that hard. Was it a video that only said masks aren’t required or was it a video with more than just one thing said? After you answer that, what was the main point of the video? It’s about HCQ working, which Trump has said previously. Trump has also previously said to wear masks so I’m going out on a limb here in saying that Trump agrees with the main theme of the video but that doesn’t automatically mean he agrees with every word said in the video. I’m just shocked you couldn’t reach that conclusion on your own. I suppose that’s why you asked for help though so I guess I have you credit for recognizing you needed help.So, Trumpsters, help me understand...
Trump retweets (multiple times) a video that says we shouldn't wear masks.
Yet, he told us previously that wearing masks is "patriotic".
Please reconcile the obvious contradiction.
Thank you and have a fantastic day!
Why are doctors pushing it if it does nothing but harm people?
I just assumed this was another example of racism but CNN didn’t say it so I guess not.That is fine, but attack what she is saying not him for retweeting the video.
Prove that she has not treated 350 patients with her cocktail and is not wearing a mask when she sees Covid-19 positive patients.
Until twitter does that, it looks like they are suppressing a doctors voice who is working on the front line who disagrees with twitter’s stance. It looks extremely hypocritical.
I’m sure the medical boards will be all over this.
Some are pushing it and using it believing they know better than the EU studies and our own clinical trials. If they are using the drug at different doses and in combination with other drugs, their observations are still anecdotal, though not necessarily untrue.
These doctors are not necessarily quacks, although some of the "touted" experts have some dubious beliefs outside accepted medical consensus of COVID treatments, among other conditions.
Again, it's not about their prerogative. It's their prerogative to take action if their reason is that they're a liberal outfit and they're Trump haters, which is another distinct possibilityOnly speculating as to Twitter response being related to the insistence that wearing a mask isn't helpful, which runs counter to public health recommendations.
So, if Twitter believes the risk, due to the high-profile status of Don Jr., worth taking action, per their TOS, it is their prerogative.
I’d take HCQ over whatever vaccine they develop.Another pro Hydro....... article. Say what you want or believe what you want, if I get Covid you bet your sweet a** that I will be taking it.
Brave Frontline COVID Doctor Calls Out Fake News, Challenges CNN's Chris Cuomo to Take a Urine Test to Prove He Isn't Taking Hydroxychloroquine (VIDEO)
Why do you keep saying I’m confused? I’m not.You seem to be confused between freedom of choice and the freedom to not agree with another’s decision.... Both can happen at the same time.
When the NYT puts out an article backing away from the Dem stance on HCQ and blaming it on this one guy then you know they’ve realized their stance has been wrong this whole time.It’s not just this 1 doctor that knows hydroxychlorquine works. It’s many.
The correct dosage and this drug is a game changer. I wonder why the effectiveness of this drug is being hidden..
If you don’t look at the data then you are a science denier.
You say harmless, clinical trials say the opposite. COVID is not Malaria.
I have already been living the way I feel:Why do you keep saying I’m confused? I’m not.
You said we should pursue herd immunity.
That is not advocating for or against people having a choice.
That is advocating for a decision.
I am disagreeing with your advocacy for that specific decision.
The freedom of choice thing is complete ********. You‘re just trying to cloak yourself in virtue by pivoting to away from a terrible argument.
The piglet did the same thing on a longer timeline.
It’s a disingenuous pivot, at best, because both of you have made clear that you hold the view that I’m disagreeing with.
Just because you attempt to shut down disagreement with your dumbass argument about herd immunity by retreating to first principles, doesn’t mean I have to follow.
They Somebody offering a lecture on the distinction between “freedom of choice” and “disagreeing with an individual’s decisions” ought to understand that.