Orangeburst
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,985
- Likes
- 130,967
From your linked article:They routinely fly over border cities. Unless they are watching the Canadien border, I see no reason for them to be in Minneapolis. It may be nothing, or it may be yet another infringement on our privacy. Who knows.
He should’ve been smarter than to say that given the temperature of the room right now. That said, it’s gonna be apology season for for the foreseeable future. It’s open season for anyone that has ever said or done anything that could possibly be construed as racist.As sure as the sun rising tomorrow.
Because to appease the crowd he had to overcharge them
@golfballs lol as she uses black hand clap emojis
Exactly right. Getting murder 2 on Chauvin will be difficult enough as it requires proof he intended to kill Floyd - GF luck. Now Ellison doubles down on stupid by charging the other officers with aiding and abetting murder.
It's as though he's trying to throw the trial(s) by indulging the family and the horde, and guaranteeing a second round.
Exactly right. Getting murder 2 on Chauvin will be difficult enough as it requires proof he intended to kill Floyd - GF luck. Now Ellison doubles down on stupid by charging the other officers with aiding and abetting murder.
It's as though he's trying to throw the trial(s) by indulging the family and the horde, and guaranteeing a second round.
I don't think intent has to be proven, necessarily. If they can prove Chauvin acted with depraved indifference, I think that can get a murder 2 charge to stick. I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not 100% on the interpretation, but I think on a second degree charge you don't always have to show intent.Exactly right. Getting murder 2 on Chauvin will be difficult enough as it requires proof he intended to kill Floyd - GF luck. Now Ellison doubles down on stupid by charging the other officers with aiding and abetting murder.
It's as though he's trying to throw the trial(s) by indulging the family and the horde, and guaranteeing a second round.
Yeah but now Mattis is a has been liberal shill!Mad Dog slams our idiot President....
Trump is needlessly dividing the country and "militarizing" America's response to the protests, Mattis wrote in a statement published by The Atlantic magazine. The former general also offered a full-throated endorsement of the demonstrations, which have unfolded across the U.S. after George Floyd, an African American man, was killed by a white Minneapolis police officer.
Mattis took particular aim at the White House's decision on Monday to forcibly clear protesters from a park in front of the White House, so that Trump could walk across the street and pose with a Bible in front of a historic church, saying it was an abuse of power.
Noting his own oath to uphold the Constitution when he first joined the military, Mattis wrote: "Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens – much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside."
In another thread someone posted from MN law that had to prove felonius assault. If he did something he was trained to do then it would be hard to proveI don't think intent has to be proven, necessarily. If they can prove Chauvin acted with depraved indifference, I think that can get a murder 2 charge to stick. I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not 100% on the interpretation, but I think on a second degree charge you don't always have to show intent.
Police Body Cam Vid Shows 'Execution' of Daniel Shaver, Officer Found Not Guilty
Warning: Video in the link is pretty disturbing.
I post this for two reasons.
1. This is about 100x worse than the Floyd murder. The way the police talked to him, the attitude, the execution, everything. Had this been a black man our country would be literally burning right now.
2. We have got to do something about police training, militarization, self-policing from the police...something. Look at this video, it is flat murder. Inscribed on his AR-15 was the words “Your ****ed”.
This police officer was found not guilty.
Infuriating. Black, white, red, whatever...this **** has to stop. I’m sure we will still have our resident police apologetics in saying the justice system worked here and this cop was justified in everything.
I don’t think he/they gets convicted on 2nd degree, but there will certainly be civil rights violations found.
3rd degree murder or manslaughter was much more reasonable.
This is all JMO because I don’t know all the legalese involved.
The man killed was a dumbass and became overwrought. The cop was too hopped up and should have recognized that. The man could have readily been handcuffed while lying face down and not crawling while being bombarded with outlandish instructions.
But it isn't murder and what he has scribed on the side of his gun is irrelevant. If this was police procedure, it is ludicrously complicated procedure. If it's not, the cop should have been charged with something fitting the situation.
The first point is well-placed. Twice as many whites are killed by police each year and under the same circumstances. We don't pillage in response.
I don't think intent has to be proven, necessarily. If they can prove Chauvin acted with depraved indifference, I think that can get a murder 2 charge to stick. I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not 100% on the interpretation, but I think on a second degree charge you don't always have to show intent.
