Unsealed Docs Show Planned Parenthood Charged $25G for Body Parts, Blood Samples within months

#1

Franklin Pierce

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
27,988
Likes
32,141
#1
Recently-unsealed documents reveal Planned Parenthood charged a biospecimen company nearly $25,000 for fetal tissue and maternal blood samples in 2012, fueling accusations from opponents that the nation's largest abortion provider violated federal law while exchanging fetal body parts.

The invoices were unsealed as part of Planned Parenthood's lawsuit with David Daleiden, the pro-life journalist whose undercover videos prompted both state and federal calls for investigations. According to the invoices, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte charged StemExpress $55.00 per "POC," or products of conception -- another term for fetal remains -- and $10.00 per sample of blood.

Three invoices -- dated Aug. 2, Sept. 5, and Sept. 28 -- show the abortion provider charging $5,860, $11,365, and $7,715. That totals $24,940, along with more than 200 POC's.

Daleiden argues that the disclosure reveals Planned Parenthood clearly violated federal law, which only allows reimbursements for associated costs rather than for the body part itself.

Planned Parenthood has defended itself by claiming that its charges related to transportation and time spent by staff. The invoices don't mention either of those, however, nor do they contain the word "reimbursement."

Instead, they assign a fee per body part. Specifically, the previously released contract between those organizations showed that the exchanges were based on "POC determined in the clinic to be usable."

Unsealed docs show Planned Parenthood charged $25G for body parts, blood samples within months
 
#3
#3
Recently-unsealed documents reveal Planned Parenthood charged a biospecimen company nearly $25,000 for fetal tissue and maternal blood samples in 2012, fueling accusations from opponents that the nation's largest abortion provider violated federal law while exchanging fetal body parts.

The invoices were unsealed as part of Planned Parenthood's lawsuit with David Daleiden, the pro-life journalist whose undercover videos prompted both state and federal calls for investigations. According to the invoices, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte charged StemExpress $55.00 per "POC," or products of conception -- another term for fetal remains -- and $10.00 per sample of blood.

Three invoices -- dated Aug. 2, Sept. 5, and Sept. 28 -- show the abortion provider charging $5,860, $11,365, and $7,715. That totals $24,940, along with more than 200 POC's.

Daleiden argues that the disclosure reveals Planned Parenthood clearly violated federal law, which only allows reimbursements for associated costs rather than for the body part itself.

Planned Parenthood has defended itself by claiming that its charges related to transportation and time spent by staff. The invoices don't mention either of those, however, nor do they contain the word "reimbursement."

Instead, they assign a fee per body part. Specifically, the previously released contract between those organizations showed that the exchanges were based on "POC determined in the clinic to be usable."

Unsealed docs show Planned Parenthood charged $25G for body parts, blood samples within months
Pro abortion people are evil ghouls
 
#5
#5
What is the difference between this and organ harvesting?
This very specifically is illegal.it was an appeasement to the pro-life that babies wouldn’t be sold. Organ harvesting is done on people who meet criteria that they will not survive.
If planned parenthood were required to only take fetuses that were not viable to survive removal they would be out of business tomorrow.
Unless you’re anti abortion you don’t want to make that comparison
 
#9
#9
This very specifically is illegal.it was an appeasement to the pro-life that babies wouldn’t be sold. Organ harvesting is done on people who meet criteria that they will not survive.
Wait, are you saying that organ harvesting is OK under certain dire conditions?

If planned parenthood were required to only take fetuses that were not viable to survive removal they would be out of business tomorrow.
That would be a good thing. What would be better is if hey were not allowed to take any fetuses at all.

Unless you’re anti abortion you don’t want to make that comparison
I am.
 
#12
#12
Maybe there is confusion in the question I am asking. I'm not saying organ donation... I'm saying organ harvesting. Meaning, you go out and kill people for their organs, similar to what China is accused of doing.
Strike my previous comments then.
 
#13
#13
Maybe there is confusion in the question I am asking. I'm not saying organ donation... I'm saying organ harvesting. Meaning, you go out and kill people for their organs, similar to what China is accused of doing.

Organ harvesting is messed up whether it's taking advantage of poor people who are willing to sell a part on the black market or people getting killed for them.

I thought we meant donors in America.
 
#16
#16
Organ harvesting is messed up whether it's taking advantage of poor people who are willing to sell a part on the black market or people getting killed for them.

I thought we meant donors in America.
Really? I never knew it would be confusion about what organ harvesting was vs being an organ donor. Oh well...
 
#18
#18
Really? I never knew it would be confusion about what organ harvesting was vs being an organ donor. Oh well...

Are you being serious or sarcastic.

I can't get a read of that.

Just trying to get your stance here.
 
#20
#20
I’ve heard rumors of them developing a sonogram with a microphone on it that will allow the Dr and mother to ask the 5 week old embryo if it consents.
So a body is a commodity to be bought and sold? That is a very troubling stance to take.
 
#24
#24
Maybe there is confusion in the question I am asking. I'm not saying organ donation... I'm saying organ harvesting. Meaning, you go out and kill people for their organs, similar to what China is accused of doing.
Thanks for the clarification I was assuming organ donation- the Chinese practices are disgusting
 
#25
#25
Serious. There isn't much difference in this to organ harvesting in my book.

You view an adult who dies in a car accident who donates their organs to others when they die the same as someone drugging a person and cutting out their organs while they are unconscious the same?

If so, how?
 

VN Store



Back
Top