20 years ago today this iconic photo was taken, courtesy of Bill Clinton

#6
#6
and Janet Reno.......Trump hates immigrants, Democrats love them!

Today's Dem party wouldn't even vote for 1998 Obama or Clinton...

- Hard on criminals and pro law enforcement
- War or Drugs
- For military use in Iraq, Bosnia, etc.
- Anti-Gay Marriage
- For rare abortions to only be used in certain situations
- Pro corporation
- Supported/Influenced by China/Russia
 
#11
#11
What about the situation was hilarious to you?
The extreme over reach and over reaction of the government. Border patrol special ops swooping in with MP5's with almost zero gun discipline and pointing them at a little kid. Good times. It was the icing on the cake of Janet Reno's wanton blood lust as AG. Luckily for everyone she opted for pure terrorism over murder.

Oh yeah, the fear in the kids eyes. That was hilarious.
 
#13
#13
They are....now. Why do you think Hillary had to apologize to the lib kooks for the 1994 crime bill that actually wanted to reduce crime?
All dems before Obama are Republicans now. Thats why all democrats running for office now must go on an apology tour first to disavow their core American values and capitulate to the worst people in the country.
 
#14
#14
It's confusing because the right keeps insisting that the dems are soft on immigration and weak on crime. Please pick a lane.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling from the Southern District Court of Florida that only González's father could petition for asylum on the boy's behalf, and not his extended relatives. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, and Attorney General Janet Reno sent federal agents who took González from the paternal relatives at gunpoint and returned him to his father in Cuba in June 2000.

But it was Janet Reno upholding the law. I really don't know what they want to spin today. But Clinton, But Reno, but they hate immigrants. Is this a preemptive strike defending Trumps new EO?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
#16
#16
Today's Dem party wouldn't even vote for 1998 Obama or Clinton...

- Hard on criminals and pro law enforcement
- War or Drugs
- For military use in Iraq, Bosnia, etc.
- Anti-Gay Marriage
- For rare abortions to only be used in certain situations
- Pro corporation
- Supported/Influenced by China/Russia

Clinton raked in mega bucks from China
 
#18
#18
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling from the Southern District Court of Florida that only González's father could petition for asylum on the boy's behalf, and not his extended relatives. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, and Attorney General Janet Reno sent federal agents who took González from the paternal relatives at gunpoint and returned him to his father in Cuba in June 2000.

But it was Janet Reno upholding the law. I really don't know what they want to spin today. But Clinton, But Reno, but they hate immigrants. Is this a preemptive strike defending Trumps new EO?
Seriously. You don't see the difference between then and now? What does upholding the law have to do with Democrats? Today they are actively working against law enforcement and judges ruling to deport illegals.
 
#19
#19
Today's Dem party wouldn't even vote for 1998 Obama or Clinton...

- Hard on criminals and pro law enforcement
- War or Drugs
- For military use in Iraq, Bosnia, etc.
- Anti-Gay Marriage
- For rare abortions to only be used in certain situations
- Pro corporation
- Supported/Influenced by China/Russia
Bunch of racist, fascist a$$holes!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO and Rickyvol77
#22
#22
Seriously. You don't see the difference between then and now? What does upholding the law have to do with Democrats? Today they are actively working against law enforcement and judges ruling to deport illegals.
Kicking illegal border jumpers out of the country is one thing, not returning a child to his parent is another. Human trafficking comes to mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
#23
#23
Seriously. You don't see the difference between then and now? What does upholding the law have to do with Democrats? Today they are actively working against law enforcement and judges ruling to deport illegals.

Continuing to insist that there's a difference between then and now isn't actually going to make it a difference, you know that - right?
 
#25
#25
Is Ivanka President running for re-election?

What's your point, is Clinton on the 2020 menu?

I'd wager Ivanka is for more likely a candidate going forward than is Clinton.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top