volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 70,375
- Likes
- 64,361
I heard that was a symptom/complication - is it pretty common in those who have other symptoms?
Loss of Smell and Taste Validated as COVID-19 Symptoms
Loss of smell and taste validated as COVID-19 symptoms in patients with high recovery rate: Study suggests clinicians should include sensory impairment as standard screening measure
Nothing super mind blowing in here, but seems to be a fairly common. My other symptoms are mainly headache, congestion, occasional chills and a slight cough. Tylenol and Sudafed seem to be managing them well enough.
My girlfriend is having a worse time than I am. She’s experiencing more of the shortness of breath and chest tightness.
I’ve read that O blood types may be more resistant and A types more susceptible. I’m O+ and she is A+, so there could be some truth to that based on my limited observations with our experience so far
I’m not going to be happy about being unable to enjoy my bourbon for 2-4 weeks tho![]()
COVID-19 Lethality Not Much Different Than Flu, Says New Study
In Santa Clara it seems to be teaching them that a whole lot more have already had this.
I would have guessed 10-20x more have had it than recorded but I was assuming a mortality rate more like 0.66%. Would have to be many more infected if rate is more like .1-.2. Point is, I think it’s fair to say there’s at least an order of magnitude more cases that measured.
What's the general consensus... if there is one on population percentage for herd immunity?I would have guessed 10-20x more have had it than recorded but I was assuming a mortality rate more like 0.66%. Would have to be many more infected if rate is more like .1-.2. Point is, I think it’s fair to say there’s at least an order of magnitude more cases that measured.
IHME just updated.
US to 60k deaths.
TN to 231 deaths. It was 5k just a matter of weeks ago and 487 prior to this update.
I thought it was around 70%. Could be wrong, been awhile since I read whatever article I saw that in.
Stockholm is a lot like San Antonio in pop and pop density. Gothenburg a lot like Atlanta. Those cities are about 15% of the population. After that cities drop off in a hurry. But there are some 200-300k in there.
Would be interesting to compare those two cities to Sweden’s. The Swedish strike me as a people that would largely social distance without being required to. Is that happening?
Denmark pop is 6 mill. Sweden is 10 mill.
IHME has Denmark at 686 projected deaths and Swden at 6k. It is obvious you get starkly different numbers with the different approaches. So it becomes a question of how much economic damage are you willing to trade off for saving how many lives.
The commentary I've read on Swedes is that they unflinchingly follow the given experts in their respective fields.
I still have to wonder about the timing of spread vs total spread. Assuming sufficient HC resources the virus will kill a certain percentage of the population (adjusted of course for co-morbidities).
The virus doesn't disappear - mitigation slows the spread. Seems over time the same # of people will become infected and thus all else equal the total death should be the same.
Sounds like this would be an opportune time to drink any cheap bourbon you may have received as a gift, or bought but didn't like after trying it!Taste and smell are 2 big parts of it not to have haha. I had just bought a bottle of Stagg Jr and Weller Antique I was looking forward to cracking open too.
Yes, I had been thinking about your comment last night in relation to the IHME numbers for Sweden and Denmark. You are correct, based on that post from last night, strategies should be largely irrelevant in end total of deaths, right? Assuming you never over stress your HC system.
presumably unless the virus ultimately gets stopped somehow. I suppose if you could always intervene with quarantine and contact tracing you would slow it to a crawl but it still seems to be a delay. People won't develop natural immunity.