Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#28,531
#28,531
Weezer said:
Ridiculous, especially from the woman who stood in Chinatown and urged people to come out. But I'm sure her base will eat it up, because who cares if people are sick and dying if they can "get Trump".
Click to expand...
Yea this is stupid and politically makes no sense. Why shot a man who is already committing suicide.
 
#28,537
#28,537
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not true!!!! And it is too much of a coincidence that she jumped on this particular stock following her Senate briefing.
Click to expand...

Nonsense; I posted the link showing you that majority of analysts were recommending buy or hold three months ago. You won't define "performing poorly" or why one would buy a stock that has already had a run-up, but not DD.

You can't be more above board than an investment manager conducting blind trades. And you really don't understand anything about stock trading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
#28,538
#28,538
evillawyer said:
And this is a MAGA hero!

Click to expand...

Also, under March 11: Limbaugh says, "... Why do you think this is COVID-19? This is the 19th coronavirus. They're not uncommon..."

COVID-19 is an abbreviation for 'Coronavirus Disease 2019'. It was formerly known as '2019 novel Coronavirus'. I hate to give a terminally ill guy a hard time, but that was stupid.
 
#28,539
#28,539
NCFisher said:
That post makes no sense. First, you don't define what "poorly performing" means because it's some crap you read, somewhere. But most importantly, you don't explain or understand that even if it were "poorly" performing over some period, it doesn't change the strong buy recommendations of analysts BEFORE her account managers did so.

You act as though this was some insider, secret trade when in fact the industry at large was saying BUY. FFS...
You don't seem to understand not buying a stock when it's hot, but buying at a lower price.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to say there's absolutely nothing there, but I have a hard time buying into this whole scandal given the position Loeffler's husband holds. If anybody on the face of the planet is going to be above board with his transactions, it's him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
#28,540
#28,540
BowlBrother85 said:
Also, under March 11: Limbaugh says, "... Why do you think this is COVID-19? This is the 19th coronavirus. They're not uncommon..."

COVID-19 is an abbreviation for 'Coronavirus Disease 2019'. It was formerly known as '2019 novel Coronavirus'. I hate to give a terminally ill guy a hard time, but that was stupid.
Click to expand...

Either stupid, or just trying to take as many people with him as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85 and Hunerwadel
#28,541
#28,541
NCFisher said:
Nonsense; I posted the link showing you that majority of analysts were recommending buy or hold three months ago. You won't define "performing poorly" or why one would buy a stock that has already had a run-up, but not DD.

You can't be more above board than an investment manager conducting blind trades. And you really don't understand anything about stock trading.
Click to expand...
You can't violate The Stock Act any more than she did. Once again, the timing here matters. She or someone acting on her behalf, traded on non-public information which she had obtained through her duty as a United States Senator. The timing is too much of a coincidence here... and yes, DuPont had not been performing well.
 
#28,542
#28,542
GAVol said:
I'm not going to say there's absolutely nothing there, but I have a hard time buying into this whole scandal given the position Loeffler's husband holds. If anybody on the face of the planet is going to be above board with his transactions, it's him.
Click to expand...
BS... and naive as all living hell.
 
#28,543
#28,543
GAVol said:
I'm not going to say there's absolutely nothing there, but I have a hard time buying into this whole scandal given the position Loeffler's husband holds. If anybody on the face of the planet is going to be above board with his transactions, it's him.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Until someone shows evidence to the contrary, this is simply smoking gun #37 of conspiracy #113.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top