volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
A QUOTE, is what the person said, not your interpretation! this is dishonest, even if you leave out one word, it is dishonest. But crap like this has never stopped the libs or commies.
Actually, if you ever knew anything about health care, you have forgotten most if not all. You are a typical liberal liar, and you know it! NO where has Pres. Trump ever, not once, insinuated or recommended people use a pet shop med, because the name was similar to the drugs being used by French/American and many other doctors to successfully treat this virus. People as dishonest as you are, should never be allowed in the health care system, around drugs.I've worked as an RN and for a pharmaceutical company, we're a year away from vaccines, minimum. I've forgotten more than he will ever know about healthcare. His pet shop treatments are going to kill people, he's not a physician and should STFU.
You can not seriously contend that saying you are quoting someone, but purposefully misquoting them isn't dishonest. I realize in the legal profession being sleezy, lying, and misrepresenting the facts is normal. One of the plays from your SOP is to fail to address the facts, just change the subject ( not a lot), just enough so it may appear to the weak minded that you are in fact addressing facts. SADYou cannot seriously contend that Trump has not minimized this. I will give him some credit. He was far, far worse about that in February and early March. He still does it, almost every day, and he can't help himself, but its better than it was.
I do think he should learn to stay in his lane. But his ego is so massive I have come to accept that he will speak with authority about things he does not understand. Personally, I view it as a deep character flaw, one that disqualifies him from office. He malkes a fool of himself on a regular basis. You are free to overlook it, however, to your heart's desire.
You can not seriously contend that saying you are quoting someone, but purposefully misquoting them isn't dishonest. I realize in the legal profession being sleezy, lying, and misrepresenting the facts is normal. One of the plays from your SOP is to fail to address the facts, just change the subject ( not a lot), just enough so it may appear to the weak minded that you are in fact addressing facts. SAD
I've worked as an RN and for a pharmaceutical company, we're a year away from vaccines, minimum. I've forgotten more than he will ever know about healthcare. His pet shop treatments are going to kill people, he's not a physician and should STFU.
I agree Trump needs to muzzle it most of the time. However, in contrast to how it's been blown up by the media it works out. They are literally trying to kill the economy.You cannot seriously contend that Trump has not minimized this. I will give him some credit. He was far, far worse about that in February and early March. He still does it, almost every day, and he can't help himself, but its better than it was.
I do think he should learn to stay in his lane. But his ego is so massive I have come to accept that he will speak with authority about things he does not understand. Personally, I view it as a deep character flaw, one that disqualifies him from office. He malkes a fool of himself on a regular basis. You are free to overlook it, however, to your heart's desire.
I used the correct standard. Your standard is pointless and misleading. That's why Trumpsters tout it.
A QUOTE, is what the person said, not your interpretation! this is dishonest, even if you leave out one word, it is dishonest. But crap like this has never stopped the libs or commies.
Another famous lawyer trick is to take a point of irrelevant disagreement and pretend that it is THE issue, when in fact its minor. Complaining that a person has omitted a word from one quote -- when the vast totality of the evidence is that Trump is minimizing this way too much, is just not effective.
Vox: Is this going to be a deadly pandemic? No. Jan 31, 2020
WaPo: Get a Grippe America. The flu is a much bigger threat than the coronavirus for now. Feb 1, 2020 Lenny Bernstein
WaPo: Why we should be wary of an aggressive gov't response to corona virus--Feb 3, 2020 Wendy Parmet and Michael Sinha
NY Times: Who says it's not safe to travel to China? The coronavirus travel ban is unjust and doesn't work anyway--Feb 5th Rosie Spinks
I guess you missed the part where Trump told them to check out aquarium cleaner because it has hydroxychloroquine in it.People who die by drinking aquarium cleaner because they found a similar word in the ingredient list have done the job that natural selection should have taken care of long, long ago
Are the Dems not currently running a candidate that makes a fool of himself on a regular basis? Don't all politicians speak with authority on **** they don't understand? Trump has made mistakes, and yes, he has diarrhea of the mouth(and thumbs as it pertains to Twitter), but a lot of your criticism seems politically motivated. Do you hold both sides to equal standards?You cannot seriously contend that Trump has not minimized this. I will give him some credit. He was far, far worse about that in February and early March. He still does it, almost every day, and he can't help himself, but its better than it was.
I do think he should learn to stay in his lane. But his ego is so massive I have come to accept that he will speak with authority about things he does not understand. Personally, I view it as a deep character flaw, one that disqualifies him from office. He malkes a fool of himself on a regular basis. You are free to overlook it, however, to your heart's desire.
I used the correct standard. Your standard is pointless and misleading. That's why Trumpsters tout it.
actually a single irregularity can alter its validity. People vs. OJ found that out with an irregularity in tranfer of evidence. Now the whole thing is shot. Just like something presented as a quote that was specifically altered. I have dealt with the difference of quoting and paraphrasing in an actual case for work.Another famous lawyer trick is to take a point of irrelevant disagreement and pretend that it is THE issue, when in fact its minor. Complaining that a person has omitted a word from one quote -- when the vast totality of the evidence is that Trump is minimizing this way too much, is just not effective.
Actually, if you ever knew anything about health care, you have forgotten most if not all. You are a typical liberal liar, and you know it! NO where has Pres. Trump ever, not once, insinuated or recommended people use a pet shop med, because the name was similar to the drugs being used by French/American and many other doctors to successfully treat this virus. People as dishonest as you are, should never be allowed in the health care system, around drugs.
Based on this data:
Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report (FluView)
It looks to me like the actual positive tests are only about 273,000 between public health labs and clinics. That’s through 11 weeks of the season, so about 25,000 cases a week.
I think the millions of cases figured is them modeled. Just as models currently suggest that a few million are infected with SARS-CoV-2, but testing is going to indicate a lower number. I won’t claim to know what the actual number is.
I think modeling hospitalizations is probably the best tool we have during an epidemic because there’s too much uncertainty in total case count.
It’s why I keep going back to the Princess Diamond numbers because they are some of the best we have and were a decent sample size. Based on that, a demographic-adjusted mortality rate of 0.8% seems reasonable.