Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

So you read into Zelensky's statement what you want it to mean even though there is nothing said that backs what you want it to mean? Got it.

Joe Biden is also not protected just because he is running for election. If any other American citizen did what he did, it would raise eyebrows and if he were of the wrong party, he would probably be subject to investigation.

No matter what, what he did and bragged about is scummy and stupid, scummy, (what he did), bragged about (stupid) and should be looked into. Particularly with the association his son, Hunter, had with the entity that was being investigated. Trump being impeached for it was purely political and had nothing to do with a violation of a law. What he did was also scummy and stupid, but not impeachable. The Democrats in the house went there anyway, which also was scummy and stupid.

Seems that there is no shortage of those two things in Washington.
I'm applying common sense and I saw the same thing that Sen. Lamar Alexander did. President Zelensky has to stay in Trump's good graces while Trump is still in office. President Trump's actions suggest that he was pressuring President Zelensky to investigate the Bidens.

You are correct that Joe Biden is not protected from scrutiny and criminal prosecution because he is running for President, but who directs and oversees any such investigation matters. President Trump should have stayed out of it. Trump has too much to gain from the outcome of such an investigation.
 
In fairness Taiwan is an island a little bigger than Maryland with the population of FL. Not that your observations don't have merit but the context is a bit different than most places.
Yes, NYC in fairness is just a little place when compared to the rest of the country, not that what is observed there doesn't have some merit, but the context is a bit different than most of the other places in the USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
I keep hearing about the AIDS population. Is their susceptibility due to the drugs they are taking or just their suppressed immunity?
I keep reading who the medical community has ID'd as those "at risk", they always mention, the elderly those with underlying health conditions, and those with Immune deficiencies (a PC way of saying: those with AIDS)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
I'm applying common sense and I saw the same thing that Sen. Lamar Alexander did. President Zelensky has to stay in Trump's good graces while Trump is still in office. President Trump's actions suggest that he was pressuring President Zelensky to investigate the Bidens.

You are correct that Joe Biden is not protected from scrutiny and criminal prosecution because he is running for President, but who directs and oversees any such investigation matters. President Trump should have stayed out of it.
So you're a mind reader? Your "common sense" seems to be mighty selective. Aren't even a little bit curious as to WTF Hunter Biden was doing in the Ukraine?

They both should have stayed out of it and it would have never been an issue.
 
You seem to understand him fine.
Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
Video | C-SPAN.org'
Donald J. Trump July 21, 2015.
 
So you're a mind reader? Your "common sense" seems to be mighty selective. Aren't even a little bit curious as to WTF Hunter Biden was doing in the Ukraine?

They both should have stayed out of it and it would have never been an issue.
No, I'm just capable of assessing President Zelensky's circumstances based on the facts as they are known to be. I am also not bending over backwards, as you are, to give Donald Trump the benefit of any doubt.

And once again, there is nothing wrong with the Bidens being investigated. I have said this about 20 times now. However, who is directing such an investigation and overseeing it is important. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal justice under the law and President Donald Trump has too much to gain from the outcome of such an investigation, to have ever been an active part of it. Simply put, President Trump should have stayed out of it, and allowed the Attorney General, William Barr and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, (who Trump both appointed) to do their jobs.
 

What is really interesting is, all the attendees were tested prior to entering (at a special booth by the front door), after the party, as they were trying to leave, armed security forced each one to take another test! It appears that having a party causes Red Chinese Bat Soup virus infections!!!
 
Last edited:
Resorting to just outright lying now, Luth? Even the article you reference doesn't say that and Trump certainly didn't. You're pathetic.

Since your propaganda aligns with the CCP, turn in your America card.
Please point out Luther's lie. I don't see it.
 
No, I'm just capable of assessing President Zelensky's circumstances based on the facts as they are known to be. I am also not bending over backwards, as you are, to give Donald Trump the benefit of any doubt.

And once again, there is nothing wrong with the Bidens being investigated. I have said this about 20 times now. However, who is directing such an investigation and overseeing it is important. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal justice under the law and President Donald Trump has too much to gain from the outcome of such an investigation, to have ever been an active part of it. Simply put, President Trump should have stayed out of it, and allowed the Attorney General, William Barr and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, (who Trump both appointed) to do their jobs.
I'm genuinely curious what I've missed. How was Trump "an active part" of any investigation into Biden?

The facts, as acquitted, seem to be that he recommended Ukraine do an investigation. There was no proof, short of hearsay, speculation and admitted assumption, that he tied aid money to any Ukraine investigation. There is no proof whatsoever that he's been "an active part" of any US DOJ investigation into the Bidens.

You seem to be assuming that Trump has been active in Biden investigations, but that seems to be all you have--assumptions and accusations.
 
No, I'm just capable of assessing President Zelensky's circumstances based on the facts as they are known to be. I am also not bending over backwards, as you are, to give Donald Trump the benefit of any doubt.

And once again, there is nothing wrong with the Bidens being investigated. I have said this about 20 times now. However, who is directing such an investigation and overseeing it is important. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal justice under the law and President Donald Trump has too much to gain from the outcome of such an investigation, to have ever been an active part of it. Simply put, President Trump should have stayed out of it, and allowed the Attorney General, William Barr and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, (who Trump both appointed) to do their jobs.
And yet you seem to not be able to use the same "ability to assess" Hunter Biden's "circumstances based on facts as they are known to be", and his Father's role in deflecting an investigation into the company that was paying him an outrageous sum for what exactly? Why does your "ability to assess" stop there?

I'm not giving Trump "the benefit of any doubt". Read what I wrote about it. Does "scummy and dumb" not register with you?
 
Not really PC at all. It covers everything from those undergoing cancer treatments, autoimmune disorders, etc.
I guess I should have added, THE VAST MAJORITY, BUT NOT EVERY SINGLE ONE. But to be technically correct down to the last shilling, you are correct.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top