The Impeachment Thread

#36,826
#36,826
NurseGoodVol said:
You don't know the breadth and scope either... We did know however since Obama write a book and devoted a chapter to wright the breadth and scope of that relationship...
Click to expand...

I'm not the one that's suggested guilt by association is a valid argument, I don't. Poisoning the well by suggesting that 'length of relationships' matters is silly, either one is a product of their peers or they are not. I grew up with a guy that I was very good friends throughout our formative years. Went to middle school and high school with him, we were thick as thieves. Sadly, he's been in and out of jail for drugs for the last twenty or so years, should his decisions reflect on me now - or not?
 
Last edited:
#36,827
#36,827
Septic said:
I'm not the one that's suggested guilt by association is a valid argument, I don't. Poisoning the well by suggesting that 'length of relationships' is silly, either one is a product of their peers or they are not. I grew up with a guy that I was very good friends throughout our formative years. Went to middle school and high school with him, we were thick as thieves. Sadly, he's been in and out of jail for drugs for the last twenty or so years, should his decisions reflect on me now - or not?
Click to expand...
You, obviously, are Mr. Lucky.
 
#36,829
#36,829
Septic said:
I'm not the one that's suggested guilt by association is a valid argument, I don't. Poisoning the well by suggesting that 'length of relationships' is silly, either one is a product of their peers or they are not. I grew up with a guy that I was very good friends throughout our formative years. Went to middle school and high school with him, we were thick as thieves. Sadly, he's been in and out of jail for drugs for the last twenty or so years, should his decisions reflect on me now - or not?
Click to expand...

Have you written about your friend influencing your life and was he your spiritual leader , did you follow him and his words ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#36,837
#36,837
evillawyer said:
Yeah, two independent counsels looked into that and found nothing. But let me guess, daily caller/zerohedge/gateway pundit say deep state blah blah blah.
Click to expand...
No idea what any of them say, or if they were around in 1993, however I'm sure the liberal media wouldn't dig into it too deep.

Independent counsel Robert Ray said after questioning Hillary that "some of her (Hillary's) statements were factually false, but there was insufficient evidence that these statements were either knowingly false, or that she (Hillary) understood her statements led to the firings." Sounds like a glowing review of Hillary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#36,839
#36,839
hUTch2002 said:
Seriously, if the situation were completely reversed would you agree with a House majority of Republicans impeaching a Democrat President with the exact same scenario? You’d be going nuts as would the entire left.
Click to expand...
It's far more relevant than what they impeached Clinton over.
 
#36,840
#36,840
Mick said:
Moscow Mitch already said he would take it up after the break. I love this shitshow we're seeing from the GOP. That's why you're mad. lol
Click to expand...

The real reason nervous Nancy, no nads Nadler and bug eyed Schiff waited was to be able to prepare these high school PowerPoint's they over pay aids to prepare when they're not surfing for porn or emailing offensive jokes.
 
#36,841
#36,841
Vol Main said:
Cute middle school remark. You support a man who trashes everybody but himself, Kim Jung I'll, and Vladimir Putin. I could go on.
Click to expand...
iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#36,844
#36,844
MontyPython said:
The House lacks ability to CONVICT. Ergo, really, they have no real power. So, who cares what they did or didn't do?

The Senate does have power. And the power to hold a real trial.
Click to expand...
The Senate cares. Come on now MP. That’s a very irresponsible take on the extremely important role of the House because the Senate has ZERO impeachment power without the House initiating the process. What the House does matters. I’m guessing you believe that too though and probably didn’t mean what you said the way it reads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#36,845
#36,845
1972 Grad said:
I believe there were actual crimes in the Clinton impeachment, but it wasn't good for the country.
Click to expand...
It was foolish to go through that process with so little time left for Clinton but I don’t want to let Luther wiggle out of it by deflecting with Slick Willie.
 
#36,846
#36,846
SpaceCoastVol said:
Seems that since it is such a somber and serious matter they wouldn't have done so with any doubt and no evidence. It shouldn't NEED any clarification by witnesses I would think... You know... being somber and serious.

But at least Nancy had some commemorative pens made up for the somber and serious matter.
Click to expand...
Nancy was grinning like a child on Christmas morning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and SpaceCoastVol
#36,847
#36,847
1972 Grad said:
No idea what any of them say, or if they were around in 1993, however I'm sure the liberal media wouldn't dig into it too deep.

Independent counsel Robert Ray said after questioning Hillary that "some of her (Hillary's) statements were factually false, but there was insufficient evidence that these statements were either knowingly false, or that she (Hillary) understood her statements led to the firings." Sounds like a glowing review of Hillary.
Click to expand...

Sure would be nice if tough man Trump had balls and actually submitted to questioning under oath like the email lady.
 
#36,850
#36,850
hUTch2002 said:
I’m not even talking about Clinton though. If the fact pattern were reversed there’s no way you’d be ok with this happening to a Democrat President.
Click to expand...
If the democratic president was as horrendously despicable of a human as is Trump, I would be in full support and agreement.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top