Should the Senate Allow Witnesses Be Called During the Impeachment Trial?

Should the Senate Call Witnesses to Testify During the Impeachment Trial?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 31 51.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 29 48.3%

  • Total voters
    60
Actually, that is not quite right. A House representative requested specific documents already gathered by the State Department. The delay you mention would only happen if the State Department refused to comply with the Senate subpoenas. Of course, Trump ordered every person in his Administration to defy the House subpoenas, and he probably would have done the same to Senate subpoenas. But Republican Senators chose to represent their own party instead of their own branch of government.

Here's the rub. Republicans criticize the House for not waiting for long court battles to obtain subpoenaed evidence and then support Republicans in the Senate after they voted to issue no subpoenas, not even one. We are witnessing partisan corruption by Republicans which most voters will not approve.

😭
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Bullfeathers .... not even a first year law student would select a grand jury member as a “ Juror “ (that’s supposed to be neutral until the evidence is heard and then reach an outcome ) that has openly and publicly bashed and called for his resignation, and or removal on national TV , while running for the office that the person holds at the time of the “ Trial “ . This isn’t a trial by law , it’s a political trial with the rules set by simple majority rule .

The topic involved the reasoned legal process for gathering evidence, available to both parties.
 
What are you 10? You can’t prove one of your BS assertions just like Mueller and the Dems have tried in vain. View attachment 255896

It is your man Trump who owes over two billion dollars to Russians who used to wear those hats. Trump's handler, Putin, was career KGB, who headed the entire Directorate before transitioning from protection of corrupt officials facing prosecution to politics as Boris Yeltsin's right hand man.
 
So are you advocating that we assign a special prosecutor to look into every elected official from hear on out to look for crimes?you know, in search of the truth and all...
I think anyone running for president should go through a background check at least as stringent to the one required for mid-level security clearance. I also think financial records should be made public.
Either of those two would have led to the avoidance of the Trump catastrophe.
 
I think anyone running for president should go through a background check at least as stringent to the one required for mid-level security clearance. I also think financial records should be made public.
Either of those two would have led to the avoidance of the Trump catastrophe.

What would have prevented Trump from being president based on that?
 
Let's get something clear. I do not serve Satan, so I do not like Trump and I do not like you. There is only one thing I want to ask of you. If/when you decide to eat one of your guns, please do not do it where any children will find you.

Sanctimonious and self-righteous much? Just remember, it’s never the fall off your high horse that gets you, it’s the hard landing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
What would have prevented Trump from being president based on that?
He's in debt to the Russian oligarchs because of bank loans through a German Bank. That makes Putin, Trump's handler.

What's the matter, don't you read Vol Main's posts? Everything he says is all true, you know?
 
What would have prevented Trump from being president based on that?
It would have uncovered and made public his unacceptable indebtedness to Russian interest.
Among other things. (He would never pass a background check)
 
It is your man Trump who owes over two billion dollars to Russians who used to wear those hats. Trump's handler, Putin, was career KGB, who headed the entire Directorate before transitioning from protection of corrupt officials facing prosecution to politics as Boris Yeltsin's right hand man.

LOL now were back to Trump being in debited to the Russians?

Y'all should have told the Muell.
 
It would have uncovered and made public his unacceptable indebtedness to Russian interest.
Among other things. (He would never pass a background check)

So you’re saying Biden should automatically be disqualified from running for President.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top