Should the Senate Allow Witnesses Be Called During the Impeachment Trial?

Should the Senate Call Witnesses to Testify During the Impeachment Trial?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 31 51.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 29 48.3%

  • Total voters
    60
#76
#76
SIAP but the witnesses deposed in the Clinton version had already been witnesses in the process. (Starr investigation) Their testimony from the Starr investigation was used in the House impeachment proceedings. No new witnesses were used in the Senate trial.

The House had their chance and punted.

I'm fine with or with out them but this is comparing apples to hand grenades

I remember you having that debate with Bowl a few weeks ago.
 
#80
#80
Should the Senate call witnesses to testify during the impeachment trial?

My understanding is that every past impeachment proceeding held by the Senate has, indeed, called witnesses to testify during their respective trial.

EDIT: 3 witnesses provided depositions for the Clinton trial, but were not called to testify as live witnesses.

Yes, and you should have someone check your grammar before submitting new thread titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#81
#81
There is no need for him to prove his innocence. It's up to the House to prove his guilt.

Wrong. It's up to the House AND Senate to hold a fair and complete trial.

Look, it's obvious why you and other Trump supporters don't want to know the facts. You're a bright guy. You know Trump's actions were corrupt.

As of this morning, 58% of the voters hear agree that facts matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#92
#92
Wrong. It's up to the House AND Senate to hold a fair and complete trial.

Look, it's obvious why you and other Trump supporters don't want to know the facts. You're a bright guy. You know Trump's actions were corrupt.

As of this morning, 58% of the voters hear agree that facts matter.

Since the House failed to live up to their obligation....

You fill in the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
#94
#94
One of the dumber things you have posted. But no the President will not and should not testify, just ask Bill Clinton
Yea it's a little dumb, but are you denying he has a neck vagina? Should he and you feel good about tossing monikers around and does it make you look equally as dumb?
 
#95
#95
Because the people with the most information/best were forbidden to testify by Trump.
Were they forbidden or were they told to go through the courts to get it? If they have the info that Trump did something why would they need to compel him or others to testify about it.

If I were the president and the subject of the craziness so many from the left I would certainly not allow myself to be thrown into some circus of fishing expeditions looking for gotcha moments

I'm convinced all politicians are dirty as hell. They all break the law, I trust none of them. I don't know if Trump did what he is being accused of or not, I think it possible, I also believe the Democrats are guilty of fudging this to large extent, the timing and the way they have handled had been shady to say the least.

I also believe Pelosi is batshit crazy.
 
#96
#96
Wrong. It's up to the House AND Senate to hold a fair and complete trial.

Look, it's obvious why you and other Trump supporters don't want to know the facts. You're a bright guy. You know Trump's actions were corrupt.

As of this morning, 58% of the voters hear agree that facts matter.

And many of them want people to testify like Biden and others to turn the tables because they believe, rightly or not, that there was just as much illegal stuff done by them or that they completely set up Trump and respect the Repubs to turn the tables.

Let's not pretend the 58% means what you want it to mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
Trump is guilty of doing what he is accused of doing. The GOP is guilty of trying to cover it up and even participating in trump illegal shakedown of a foreign country and a disinformation plot against the American people.

The Biden Hoax is a real hoax orchestrated by team Trump.

Actually, the House is guilty for a false impeachment. "Abuse of power" is not a crime even if it were true. "Obstruction of Congress" is a fantasy because the President can use executive privilege. Perfectly legal. This was a political opinion impeachment, nothing more and
Trump will not be convicted.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top