hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 121,346
- Likes
- 179,466
That's toro caca.That sounds good, but it's not what I've observed on this forum, nor is it how Trump apparently thinks either. There is an expectation from the right-wing for unconditional support of all things Trump, and anyone who breaks from that, is considered to be disloyal. Trump's recent attacks on Fox News are a prime example of this. He thinks they should have his back and the policy in question is irrelevant. I see that a lot on here too.
Liz and Bernie didn't go on video and throw dirt on their own grave.I will only give you 1 reason why he will:
1) He is the best equipped to beat Trump. This one time.. that will be enough to override ideology for the Democratic Party nomination. Trump must agree with this or else he wouldn't be trying so hard to dig up dirt on Biden. I don't see him digging for dirt on Liz or Bernie. Do you?
Disagree. RINOs may dislike him along with Libs but this guy is packing the courts with good Jugdes, Economy is Great, Super Low Unemployment, Fighting for the Wall, taking it to the DIMs and their liberal media. What's wrong with any of that if one is a conservative?LIberal? LOL........The Donald lies and makes false claims far more often than he actually tells the truth. I can tell by your posts you're more a supporter of Trump than America. Cool. That's your right
BTW, plenty of Republicans/Conservatives dislike this clown. AT least most of the honorable ones anyway
Good grief. That was a merciless assassination.That is an incorrect and projecting characterization; I've stated Biden being a candidate doesn't shield him from scrutiny and if that scrutiny originates from Trump sounding an alarm, he can certainly do that. I've stated he cannot oversee or manage such an investigation, which he acknowledges with the three references to Barr contacting Ukraine officials. I've stated his conversation with Zelensky is not an impeachable "offense".
I stated as counsel, I'd advise him to lay off Ukraine and Burisma and let Barr and Durham do the heavy lifting; stay focused on the treacherous people within OUR government. And when scalps hang on DOJ's wall, there'll be a clear path to deep dive into Ukraine and Burisma/Biden. That Durham will be talking to Ukraine, anyway.
How you find that ambiguous?
Do you know who the 17 agencies are? Under what purview, as Mueller would say, would DEA, Coast Guard, National Geospatial, the four military branches for example, be in a position to approve the Jan. 2017 ICA? That's correct; none. The claim appears to have originated with Hillary Clinton in Oct. 2016 and simply parroted by the babbling media and elected Democrats. Clapper corrected that twice in congressional testimony. NYT retracted in June 2017, as did AP at some point. It was a idiotic claim from the outset.
Why worry about presidential conversations with world leaders being leaked or radical House factions being able to demand them? You mean aside from often being classified? Aside from the consideration that world leaders expect confidentiality in order to speak plainly to each other?
Gee, i wonder why Obama also logged his conversations with world leaders to those same "secret servers"? A practice Trump has been exercising since Feb. 2017 when, repeating myself, Resistance! asshats leaked conversations with Turnbull/AU and Nieto/MX NSusan Rice: Obama Put Call Transcripts On Top Secret Server, Too C'mon man, I can give you this stuff but I can't make you read or comprehend it.
Now you're fabricating; I didn't say "every president since Washington" - read it again:
"So, you aren't aware presidents have used non-governmental persons they trust to do exactly what Giuliani is doing - and more - since Washington." And here's one of a number of substantiations: Giuliani-Style 'Shadow' Diplomacy: Par for the Course for U.S. Presidents | RealClearInvestigations
Between what you want me to be saying and being caught up in breathless exhortations and mischaracterizations by media, radical Dems, defrocked FBI, DOJ and intel priests, you ought to be steaming at the horseshite you've been fed, instead of asking for a doggie bag.
For 3.5 years.
What does it take?
Who is the new guy? Another identity for Mick, Paper Tiger, Piss Corpse, or somebody like that?
You guys?? LOL.....It isn't nothing that he stood up on the world stage and took Putin's word over his own intelligence services. The more you minimize his behavior, the less you can claim to be a patriotLOL
And your true colors come shining through. It's the tried and true comeback for you guys when you have nothing, call Trump a traitor.
You guys?? LOL.....It isn't nothing that he stood up on the world stage and took Putin's word over his own intelligence services. The more you minimize his behavior, the less you can claim to be a patriot
A dislike for the man and his pathetic behavior. I get it. You care more about supporting him than you do this countryDisagree. RINOs may dislike him along with Libs but this guy is packing the courts with good Jugdes, Economy is Great, Super Low Unemployment, Fighting for the Wall, taking it to the DIMs and their liberal media. What's wrong with any of that if one is a conservative?
You guys?? LOL.....It isn't nothing that he stood up on the world stage and took Putin's word over his own intelligence services. The more you minimize his behavior, the less you can claim to be a patriot
You keep saying you guys. I don't understand. I am posting alone and don't know anyone here personally. That being the case, you literally have no idea what you're talking about. I'm glad to hear you haven't claimed to be a patriot. Your posts suggests anything but thatI don't think I have ever claimed to be a patriot, you guys have cheapened the word so much that it's pretty meaningless now.
Now, let me ask you a question. Since when has being distrustful and doubting of our intelligence community bureaucrats been unpatriotic? I'm not talking about the rank and file employees, I'm talking about the weasels that make it to the top of those organizations. With everything that has come out recently how could you not be skeptical of them?
You keep saying you guys. I don't understand. I am posting alone and don't know anyone here personally. That being the case, you literally have no idea what you're talking about. I'm glad to hear you haven't claimed to be a patriot. Your posts suggests anything but that