Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#78,777
#78,777
ChattaTNVol said:
I’ve been hearing from various sources a lot of hype surrounding Kentucky’s defensive line haul in this recruiting class. After comparing signees and commitments (and expected commitments) to date for the more significant opponents on our schedule I think what the narrative leaves out is that sure this is an impressive defensive line class for Kentucky being that they are Kentucky. The fact is that the average for their defensive line class this cycle, for the moment, ranks last among the teams listed and would still rank last even if by some chance we didn’t end up signing Hardy.

View attachment 248510
Click to expand...
No Vandy? Chatt has a soft spot for Vandy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
#78,779
#78,779
gainesvol82 said:
LSU didn't smoke Bama, UF or Auburn like they did UGA....Texas neither.

UGA played them worse than 4-5 other teams on their schedule. Maybe it was just a bad matchup but LSU took the strongest parts of their team(defense and OL) behind the woodshed.
Click to expand...
Maybe those are not the strongest part of UGAs team. UGA played against new QBs all year. Their defensive production was a little inflated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 99Vol and HeadVol77
#78,782
#78,782
Buddy’s Bandit said:
Sometimes I forget there is a story behind each one of these kids lives.....this puts it in perspective. Good Luck to this one wherever he chooses......

Click to expand...


Alot of people dont know how bad North Las Vegas is. I know this young man was born there but grew up a little East. Def pulling for him. Just not when (if) he plays us
 
  • Like
Reactions: CurtWatson31, INKYBERRYVOL and Ulysees E. McGill
#78,785
#78,785
ABINGDON VOL FAN said:
To become elite you have to play elite. Win or Lose , UT will benefit from this game long-term.
Click to expand...


I don't have any problem with the game itself, I judge each game independently.
Often tho, many of the same people that clamor for even a tougher schedule, are the same ones that throw out a Michigan's (whoever's) record, when discussing coaches or programs.

"_______ is passing us on the all time wins list, we're pathetic...
But on a completely unrelated note,we need to add a 4th top 10 team to the schedule."

So any 'I'd rathers' are based solely on being tired of the double standard. I honestly don't care which, but just pick a preference and stick with it for a change.
Wts, Vols win😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakez4ut
#78,787
#78,787
Orange Studs said:
You will love this. The reason I took a break from it was because I am at I Peter 3: 1 - 7. About woman being submissive. LOL BUT if you study the passage he is talking to the wives in the Church who were going about the wrong way to win their husbands to the Lord. They were going back to the way they dressed when they were lost. Peter was saying your appealing to their depraved nature and the Holy Spirit doesn't work through that. One of my point and I do break down each verse is that you can win them without saying a word. Just by living out who you are in Christ.
Click to expand...

As your post is still here -- I'd like to reply, by saying: Interesting. So, your explanation might explain why Paul spoke to the churches and to Timothy, about "women" keeping "silent" "in the churches" (i.e. public pulpit preaching/pastoring vs at-home)?

Where do you stand, on "wives" / female / women (pulpit) preaching? Can you let me know, in the other thread?

In other words: do you teach this as does what apply for Christian women while at home also is to apply while "in the churches"?

Again, Can you let me know, in the other thread (not here)?
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top