volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
Right it's her kid. She has the right to fight for her own kid just like your boy Biden does for his 50 year old crack head baby. I will teach you about marriage, most married people who have an issue with each other on a topic don't air it out in front of everyone.She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.
She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.
My ex-wife and I certainly did... but I guess that's off topic.Right it's her kid. She has the right to fight for her own kid just like your boy Biden does for his 50 year old crack head baby. I will teach you about marriage, most married people who have an issue with each other on a topic don't air it out in front of everyone.
Of course she will go an extra step when it's her kid though.She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.
The better question is why is it all First Ladies are supposed to take up an issue? Busy work I guessMy ex-wife and I certainly did... but I guess that's off topic.
In this case, and especially in light of her "Be Better" campaign against cyber-bullying??? It does make her look ridiculous to have her husband being critical of a 16 year old girl on Twitter - while she says absolutely nothing about it.
I just knew that SOB was a criminal.Goes through the five crimes underlying the impeachment
Criminal Abuse of Power: Trump's Five Crimes Connected to Ukraine - CREW
Rut-Roh!Goes through the five crimes underlying the impeachment
Criminal Abuse of Power: Trump's Five Crimes Connected to Ukraine - CREW
Melania Trump didn't have to take up an issue. I don't think Laura Bush ever did ... but for some bizarre reason, Melania Trump took up cyber-bullying. It shows a lack of self-awareness on her part.The better question is why is it all First Ladies are supposed to take up an issue? Busy work I guess
I remember Laura Bush taking up something but I don't remember what it was, they are all pointless. I am sure some adviser told her that would be the issue she would take upMelania Trump didn't have to take up an issue. I don't think Laura Bush ever did ... but for some bizarre reason, Melania Trump took up cyber-bullying. It shows a lack of self-awareness on her part.
It's an official request that, if granted, means the recognized person can officially start their, normally, 5 mins of time.Just some Impeachment hearing knowledge:
Impeachment articles hearing: what does ‘strike the last word’ mean?