The Impeachment Thread

I don't have access to Trump-et to ask her but you are here. Where were you to defend Barron?
I can imagine Barron around his friends after that incident telling the tale of how it didn't bother him when in reality
Secret Service had to escort him to his safe place. Or is that backwards?
 
She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.
Right it's her kid. She has the right to fight for her own kid just like your boy Biden does for his 50 year old crack head baby. I will teach you about marriage, most married people who have an issue with each other on a topic don't air it out in front of everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.

Well said!
 
Right it's her kid. She has the right to fight for her own kid just like your boy Biden does for his 50 year old crack head baby. I will teach you about marriage, most married people who have an issue with each other on a topic don't air it out in front of everyone.
My ex-wife and I certainly did... but I guess that's off topic.

In this case, and especially in light of her "Be Better" campaign against cyber-bullying??? It does make her look ridiculous to have her husband being critical of a 16 year old girl on Twitter - while she says absolutely nothing about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coug
She felt the need to go public with her criticism when her son was mentioned, so if she was being consistent, she should do the same now... but the truth is, in spite of what she said last week, it's not a child being mentioned that bothered her. It only bothered her, because it was HER child. Her anti cyber-bullying campaign is a joke. Her husband is the quintessential cyber-bully.
Of course she will go an extra step when it's her kid though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
My ex-wife and I certainly did... but I guess that's off topic.

In this case, and especially in light of her "Be Better" campaign against cyber-bullying??? It does make her look ridiculous to have her husband being critical of a 16 year old girl on Twitter - while she says absolutely nothing about it.
The better question is why is it all First Ladies are supposed to take up an issue? Busy work I guess
 
Rut-Roh!

iu
 
The better question is why is it all First Ladies are supposed to take up an issue? Busy work I guess
Melania Trump didn't have to take up an issue. I don't think Laura Bush ever did ... but for some bizarre reason, Melania Trump took up cyber-bullying. It shows a lack of self-awareness on her part.
 
Melania Trump didn't have to take up an issue. I don't think Laura Bush ever did ... but for some bizarre reason, Melania Trump took up cyber-bullying. It shows a lack of self-awareness on her part.
First Lady Laura Bush took up the issue of literacy.
 
Melania Trump didn't have to take up an issue. I don't think Laura Bush ever did ... but for some bizarre reason, Melania Trump took up cyber-bullying. It shows a lack of self-awareness on her part.
I remember Laura Bush taking up something but I don't remember what it was, they are all pointless. I am sure some adviser told her that would be the issue she would take up
 
Advertisement

Back
Top