The Impeachment Thread

#26,881
#26,881
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#26,885
#26,885
Mick said:
Carter Pages previous work with the CIA is not exculpatory evidence for Trump.
Click to expand...
It's exculpatory evidence for Carter Page. Why was it not included? There are transcripts of the attempts to set up Carter Page. The info that would have helped him was excluded from the FISA warrant renewals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
#26,888
#26,888
Orangeburst said:
How do you know? Shokin has a witness statement for the reason

Thread by @DavidJohnWeave: "1) Shokin Testimony Against Joe Biden September 4, 2019, part I September 26, 2019 by David John Weaver @davidjohnweave Former Vice Presiden […]"
Click to expand...
The chronology doesn't work. The investigation into Burisma, where Hunter Biden worked, was dormant by the time Shokin was pushed out. Most importantly, any investigation by Shokin would have been an anomaly. During Shokin's 13 months in office, not one major figure was ever convicted. No oligarch. No bureaucrat. No politician. Nobody. Shokin was not a crusading, independent prosecutor. He was, in fact, a part of the corruption.
 
#26,891
#26,891
Septic said:
No doubt about that, how dare he produce a report that doesn't corroborate Trump's fairy tales!
Click to expand...

Well for one, I am not going to bother to read it and I am sure nobody on here has. The only thing I have heard was there are a lot of footnotes that are concerning as pointed out by 72 and others.
 
#26,894
#26,894
1972 Grad said:
It's exculpatory evidence for Carter Page. Why was it not included? There are transcripts of the attempts to set up Carter Page. The info that would have helped him was excluded from the FISA warrant renewals.
Click to expand...
No, it's not exculpatory evidence for Carter Page either.

"The application received the necessary Department approvals and certifications as required by law. As we fully descri be in Chapter Five, this application received more attention and scrutiny than a typical FISA application in terms of the additional layers "
 
#26,897
#26,897
Mick said:
No, it's not exculpatory evidence for Carter Page either.

"The application received the necessary Department approvals and certifications as required by law. As we fully descri be in Chapter Five, this application received more attention and scrutiny than a typical FISA application in terms of the additional layers "
Click to expand...
You are cherry picking the reportB8EFDAD8-7D41-48B9-9AA7-3F6FC787BD91.jpeg
Notice the middle of the section mick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#26,898
#26,898
Orangeburst said:
Well for one, I am not going to bother to read it and I am sure nobody on here has. The only thing I have heard was there are a lot of footnotes that are concerning as pointed out by 72 and others.
Click to expand...

Of course you're not, it doesnt jeehaw with the narrative that Trump was spied on due to deep state bias and FISA abuse. Had it done so, the trumpers would be swinging from the rafters and hailing Horowitz as the impartial, non biased arbiter of truth and the American way.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top