PeaceCorpsVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 1,392
- Likes
- 406
Internalize those externalities. No one--pro or anti-gun--can deny that gun usage in the US creates a sh*t ton of negative externalities that are borne by persons other than the gun owner or gun maker. This is just one step to putting those costs back onto the parties in the best position to limit those externalities.
You mean like this guy?Another school shooting. Anybody but libtards care? If this happened and you lost a child due to someone having a gun that otherwise wouldn’t if there were common sense gun laws would you change your mind?
So guns > your child. I give you credit for your honesty
Sorry about your loss. I stopped reading after there should be no law against drunk driving.I lost a fiance to a repeat DUI offender and believe there should be no law against drunk driving. Only drunk crashing with extremely harsh penalties.
Living in a free society can be dangerous, I'd rather be free and live with danger than be safe without freedom.
I guess I never realized how bad you really are at mislabeling people maybe I gave you more credit than you actually deserved. And I didn’t really give you any credit at allI guess I never realized how many folks on here are closer to anarchists than they are moderate Republicans. *shrugs shoulders*

