- Joined
- Oct 22, 2003
- Messages
- 95,291
- Likes
- 102,969
Because Shrout was ineffective and JG wasn't. JG did throw a bad pick, but Shrout tried to and just failed.
Did you watch the game last week? Which QB do you think moved the ball better?
I guess the deal is this, Pruitt and Chaney see the upsides in Shrout and Maurer. They know their ceilings are higher, but they feel JG can get them where they got to be this year and, hey, they've got Bailey coming next year, so if one or both of these boys don't like it....forget the fact both of them are better QBs than Guarantano right now.Shrout was 3-6 in very limited time. He wasn’t given enough series, or enough opportunity to get in a rhythm before being yanked.
JG did next to nothing either.
Comon now JG did nothing? That's not an honest assessment. Shrout wasn't checking off and threw into double coverage. He was very lucky that didn't get picked off. He's wasn't ready tonight. Looked pretty good last week. Looked like a liability tonight. JG was clearly the better QB in this game. How much more of Shrout did you need to see? It's a shame we can't enjoy a win without people criticizing and nitpicking. Yeah it could have been 45-0 but the end result was the same.
There is no justification for benching JT for what he did. Jerry was ineffective, made bad throws, had a pick, was a liability with the hand, etc etc etc. It's simple fear based play calling and management to not put the high reward guy out there. This is the kind of game that you do put him out there to see what he can do and get game time, especially with their offense handing you the game. Whatever blackmail Jerry has on Pruitt must be damning.
yeah, evidently he had his reasons. I see this stuff all over the msg board about JT or Shrout throwing into double or triple coverage at times or have an interception.I’m sure he has his reasons. JG has a bad INT but Shrout tries to force things. The offense did its job and the game was never in doubt.
Truth is, because of some idiotic game on ESPNU that nobody cares about, I missed Shrout's opening drive. When I tuned in it was 3 to zip. Then, after a few minutes it was 6 to zip. Then, it was 9 to zip and I'm wondering why we're playing the dude with the broken hand when he's giving us the same results the other guy is--I think. It's hard to say because the other guy got the really quick hook. Why are we playing the guy we all wanted to get rid of in order to get the same results for the guys with more upside? I don't get it. Glad we won. Thanks Bryce and defense and Cimaglia."Why the hell did you take out Shrout so soon for a one handed QB???"
IMO Pruitt will say anything to protect his quarterback. Pruitts stunt of playing JG tonight could have backfired on him big time all these happy people and press would be bringing the heat on Pruitt if JG had gotten injured worse.I found it interesting that JG gets a pass on the ball being slick because of the air, but JT gets called out for throwing one across his body on the run. JG's interception in the EZ was a terrible decision off his back foot.
I'm with you except for the last sentenceThere is no justification for benching JT for what he did. Jerry was ineffective, made bad throws, had a pick, was a liability with the hand, etc etc etc. It's simple fear based play calling and management to not put the high reward guy out there. This is the kind of game that you do put him out there to see what he can do and get game time, especially with their offense handing you the game. Whatever blackmail Jerry has on Pruitt must be damning.
Random Reporter "So after actually winning a game and getting closer to bowl eligibility, you still have fans pissed. What do you say to them?"
JP "F those misreable POS so called fans"
*knocks mic over*