volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
How different is it than the contortions you and others make to defend the Dems? While I think there's reason for an impeachment inquiry, and very possibly reason for impeachment itself, I can't say I support some of the tactics the left has used to reach this point. Both sides have been playing fast and loose with the rules, but it seems only one side will be held accountable. Trump may very well be deserved of removal from office, but there are some Congress people deserved of removal as well.With all the recent contortions Republicans have made to defend Trump, I'm starting to believe the P in GOP stands for pretzel.
And yet you guys are playing the "original whistleblowers don't matter anymore because a CIA analyst that was listening in testified that he was uncomfortable about the call" card.His legal opinion -- i.e., whether anything was illegal -- is of no relevance. What matters would be his factual knowledge.
Catherine Herridge reported today that Taylor testified that Vindman was concerned about how the call would "affect bi-partisan support for Ukraine". Nothing about anything illegal. Sounds like a policy difference with the man born in Ukraine.And yet you guys are playing the "original whistleblowers don't matter anymore because a CIA analyst that was listening in testified that he was uncomfortable about the call" card.
lol
Catherine Herridge reported today that Taylor testified that Vindman was concerned about how the call would "affect bi-partisan support for Ukraine". Nothing about anything illegal. Sounds like a policy difference with the man born in Ukraine.
Neither Luther or I made Lindsey Graham, Mick Mulvaney, Kevin McCarthy, our numerous others speak about Trump the way did before he became president. It isn’t our fault such a large number refused to endorse him prior to the election. News flash, they don’t think any more highly of him now. They’re just afraid of his cult.
I would gladly take a loss to a level headed, established (non horrendously despicable) guy to rid the world of Trump.Why? You yourself say he is terrible, stupid, unstable and bad for the country so it seems to me that he would be easier to defeat in the general than a level headed establishment guy that doesn't scare people.
And my point was in opposition to this. The point that that crazy accusation has been so overused that the average American sees the person who makes it as a bit unhinged and deserving ridicule.
People don't talk about it that much, but Russia is very top of the brain. The Ukraine scandal is definitely not unrelated to Russian influence suspicions.
The “squad” makes up 4 representatives in overwhelmingly blue districts. Nancy has no problem ignoring the squad, and she has shown it. See her dismissal of the green new deal. AOC has even whined about her on Twitter, and it hasn’t seems to affect her much.LOL
They're afraid of his cult just as Nancy is afraid of the "squad's" cult.
The last time the whole "Russian Asset" card was resurrected was the has-been Hillary cooking up a Russian asset accusation against the least crazy Dem Prez hopeful, and that least-crazy Dem Prez hopeful calling Hillary a washed-up, deranged lunatic for playing the card.