Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Probably because it would be mindnumbing and no financial incentive. And it would take years to have meaningful data since there's only 12 games a year. Fwiw this data may be somewhere or someone does it. Someone either did it last year or uncovered the data for basketball because they had some damning numbers on "the LSU ref".

People already do mind-numbing work for no financial gain (hence my NCAA football roster example). "Meaningful numbers" is subjective. I'm thinking we could get some meaningful numbers out of just two games this past Saturday.
 
Very unfortunate that a bowl game hinges on a single injury.
For years it has. Still amazing how durable Dobbs was. Every year I thought if he went down we were screwed. Haven't had a defense and run game to win us games since maybe 2015. Luckily we didn't have to find out. We will this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangebloodgmc
Probably because it would be mindnumbing and no financial incentive. And it would take years to have meaningful data since there's only 12 games a year. But maybe this data is already somewhere or someone does it. Someone either did it last year or uncovered the data for basketball because they had some damning numbers on "the LSU ref".
KY bb fans keep a database of every ref every game. But they are exactly the ones who do NOT need it. The rigged officiating in Rupp is the bb equivalent to bammer football.

Edit: Every KY game.
 
Last edited:
People already do mind-numbing work for no financial gain (hence my NCAA football roster example). "Meaningful numbers" is subjective. I'm thinking we could get some meaningful numbers out of just two games this past Saturday.
Well, people LOVE ncaa football 2014 or whatever it is (passion). If someone has passion for college referreeing, then they should go for it. I'd love to see it.

Meaningful numbers isn't completely subjective. There is a statistical measure for this. Statistical significance. You need enough volume of data. Also have to know what would be "average" or anomalous. If that isn't public or can be received by the ncaa or a league office, then you'd have to build that up too, taking much longer.

Then there's the issue of non-calls which isn't noted or tracked and would need expert analysis and watching entire games.

Quite a task. Which is why I like a non-ncaa oversight board idea.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WriterVol
This is the guy responsible for many of the atrocious officiating all night.
Yes! I recognize that face after he whistled, "woah woah guys, Tennessee was trying to trick us and our players were out of position...let's reset the play clock and sit here to give Uncle Nick a minute to get us prepared...ok let's roll! tide!"
 
You know who doesn't have immediate family members? Robots. First person to come up with automated AI refereeing will be so dang rich.
 
Shrout needs game reps. He'll either get up to speed or he won't... but he certainly won't get game-ready sitting on the bench. They didn't think Maurer was ready, either.

This is what I’m stressing..you just don’t know until you put them out there..but him being a better passer gives us options..Chaney will just have to settle him in like they did Maurer I think he will be fine.
 
You know who doesn't have immediate family members? Robots. First person to come up with automated AI refereeing will be so dang rich.
Yeah, nothing like seeing an AI bot busted open on the field and all the processors stamped "Designed at the University of Alabama, manufactured at toll ride industries".
 
Dude is about to lose his job over this.

Welp... you intentionally screwed dem Vols over, violating the integrity of the game which you are employed to uphold, so I appear to be fresh out of cares to give
You really think he'll lose his job? I don't think Sankey has the balls to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JacketVol
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top