butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,971
- Likes
- 224,957
Yea never know about completion levels and i sure as hell donāt trust those āverified 40sāWhy don't you actually watch some film, then check his physical, and on dield numbers and get back with me..screw the services.
We have websites that list, collate, and analyze every piece of sports data available. How has no one created one for referees? A ref's body of work is explicitly available for public consumption.
You'd need to analyze them in an obviously transparent way. Maybe have a small committee of people that aren't fans of the teams their watching. You could even start it up just doing major games or games that get a lot of complaints to get the ball rolling. If successful, you could grow it from there.
I say send him out there and see what he can do.He can make all the throws and put something extra on em Unrealistic to expect him to be polished in his sparse game action. He was out on the field against an amped up Bama defense fresh off a defensive touchdown and we expect him to carve em up like a turkey. Needs some confidence and decisiveness but we donāt KNOW thatās heās minus capability.
Donāt disagree. But I could see the wisdom in bringing him if JG follows his usual course when starting this season. Lot of pressure off and a switch to present to the opposing defense. The rest of this team is just looking for someone to DO THEIR JOB...so they can do theirs.I say send him out there and see what he can do.
But at the START of the game. Not after 3 or 4 series and JG has sucked the life out of the place.
The solution is not to ruin ignore but to disallow him starting player threads. There's a second example of the same. But I will add, that happened to me too, but someone mentioned it (prolly to you) and so I unblocked and found Hardy. You'll find out anyway when someone else says they can't find it.I didn't even know we were pursuing a player by the name of Jay Hardy because OD started the thread and I had him on ignore. Had to unignore him to see the thread.
Spread them out with 4 WR. That will make it a little bit easier to run the ball. I just hate it when we stack everybody in bunch formation and try to run the ball. It is almost never successful.Come on man, you know how this is going to go..Mushdump is going to stack the box, and make JG throw to win. We ain't running on that, and JG is not beating anybody. He is a black hole that sucks all hope out of everything.
Think you'd want a current ref or rules expert to head this.
Either way, there's no financial incentive for someone to pour over this. The public is also limited to TV shots. I believe programs have something David Ubben has referred to as "24-angle" shots of all games. It would also be hard to know which judge is calling each penalty. Obvious sometimes, but plenty of times we don't know.
I've read there is some auditing of referree work...but I have no insight as to who does it. Would like to see an auditing firm combine with rules experts to independently audit everything.
There should be a quasi-NCAA subbody - wherein the member universities must fund it - but can have zero input on the committee. That committee could audit and oversee all referreeing. They would have no power to fire and hire, but they would make all information public. Basically just a public independent oversight body.
Spread them out with 4 WR. That will make it a little bit easier to run the ball. I just hate it when we stack everybody in bunch formation and try to run the ball. It is almost never successful.
Yeah, I changed my avi back when I read it. Trying to look forward but the justifications keep setting me off anew.Just pisses me off more
Probably because it would be mindnumbing and no financial incentive. And it would take years to have meaningful data since there's only 12 games a year. But maybe this data is already somewhere or someone does it. Someone either did it last year or uncovered the data for basketball because they had some damning numbers on "the LSU ref".This isn't what I'm asking for. I wouldn't want any university or conference involved. My idea is fan-driven. Hence the need to transparency. You've got guys out there willing to rate and rename every player on every team in an NCAA video game. Surely, there'd be folks willing to do this. You just need an organized ring leader. And, like I said, you could start small.
Most fouls you can see who throws the flag. If on any play you can't, it goes to the crew pool.