Amateur Hour Continues

#20,826
#20,826
1972 Grad said:
All I know is that a lot of you people think that Palin said she could see Russia from her porch, and it was Tina Fey instead.
Click to expand...
To be fair, I do remember some people thought that was actually her. Honestly, some people probably still do.

That being said, the stupidity of Palin cannot be understated.
 
#20,827
#20,827
lawgator1 said:
Trump will never allow that. You realize that, don't you? In fact, it might well be the case that had he really upped enforcement of such laws it would be a far more effective disincentive to illegal immigrants than a half built and easily defeated wall.
Click to expand...

I agree with this but there are already IRCA law on the books. Looks like Asplundh (tree service) was fined $96 million few years ago. Looks to be a lack of enforcement of even current law and sanctuary cities certainly do not help. Maybe the fines are not enough disincentive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#20,829
#20,829
Velo Vol said:
Time to clean out the meteorological Deep State.

Click to expand...


For those keeping score at home, this clown ordered NOAA administrators under threat of losing their jobs to prop up #fakenews to fluff Trumps mushroom.

Q is certainly losing his mind over this over on 4-chan, right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, newarkvol, BartW and 1 other person
#20,830
#20,830
EED2PIVWsAATZvz
 
#20,831
#20,831
BowlBrother85 said:
You don't understand what a double negative is. That would be two negatives per one subject (not necessarily two negatives in the same sentence). In the sentence you just cited, there is only one negative employed per each subject. The first subject was "Obama" and the first negative was the word "never". The second subject was "Russia" and the second negative was the word "wasn't". Again, there was a subject present for each individual negative used. Another way to put it, the negative followed the subject (and there was only one negative in use, per each subject). That was not a double negative. You are wrong.

An example of a double negative would be: "The boy didn't do nothing wrong." In that case, you only have one subject (the boy) and two negatives (didn't and nothing). However, it would not be a double negative to say that "The boy didn't do what they said wasn't right." It is acceptable to have two negatives in the same sentence. You just need each negative to follow it's own subject. In this example, the word "wasn't" follows the subject "they".
Click to expand...
Employ the Harbrace Handbook to prove your point or STFU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#20,832
#20,832
tvolsfan said:
To be fair, I do remember some people thought that was actually her. Honestly, some people probably still do.

That being said, the stupidity of Palin cannot be understated.
Click to expand...
Now that you bring it up, I do remember her saying that there were 57 states and pronouncing "corpsman" as "corpseman."
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#20,834
#20,834
Trump says he stopped the refugees coming in because we have a big problem with people, especially criminals and drug dealers, having come in to the Bahamas to sneak in here.

Does anybody in their right mind believe that? Come on. It is totally racial profiling by him that he knows the base will like. Drug dealers did not run off to the Bahamas to sit under 150 mph winds for 30 hours so they could sneak in to the US, WITH NO DRUGS!

It is so transparently racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BartW and Mick
#20,835
#20,835
lawgator1 said:
Trump says he stopped the refugees coming in because we have a big problem with people, especially criminals and drug dealers, having come in to the Bahamas to sneak in here.

Does anybody in their right mind believe that? Come on. It is totally racial profiling by him that he knows the base will like. Drug dealers did not run off to the Bahamas to sit under 150 mph winds for 30 hours so they could sneak in to the US, WITH NO DRUGS!

It is so transparently racist.
Click to expand...
The drug cartels have started predicting the weather.
 
#20,837
#20,837
VolStrom said:
Employ the Harbrace Handbook to prove your point or STFU.
Click to expand...
I lived the Harbrace handbook in both high school and college.... and I am correct. This is the Trump playbook at work by one of his followers. Never admit error, double down and stubbornly maintain an argument even when it is without merit.
 
#20,840
#20,840
lawgator1 said:
NYT is reporting that Wilbur Ross, head of Commerce, called head of NOAA and threatened to fire the entire agency leadership if they did not back Trump.

This is the facktard administration the GOP has given us. Liars, screeching insane demands, to protect this loon's ego.
Click to expand...
Inpeech Fotey Fie!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#20,841
#20,841
lawgator1 said:
NYT is reporting that Wilbur Ross, head of Commerce, called head of NOAA and threatened to fire the entire agency leadership if they did not back Trump.

This is the facktard administration the GOP has given us. Liars, screeching insane demands, to protect this loon's ego.
Click to expand...
That explains that unsigned statement from the NOAA on Friday. There is no extreme he won't go to, in order to give the appearance of "winning" an argument. It is childishly irrational and egocentric.
 
#20,844
#20,844
BowlBrother85 said:
That explains that unsigned statement from the NOAA on Friday. There is no extreme he won't go to, in order to give the appearance of "winning" an argument. It is childishly irrational and egocentric.
Click to expand...


Irrational is a good way to describe him. Irresponsible is a way to describe anyone that votes for him again, given everything we know about him now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, luthervol and BowlBrother85
#20,849
#20,849
The walls are caving in on him on this US spy story. We had to yank the guy out of Russia, Kremlin access, because Trump is an agent.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top