Recruiting Forum Football Talk [RIP 9.3.2019]

Status
Not open for further replies.
#172,278
#172,278
JacketVol said:
This is the kind of woman my son needs to look for in a future wife.
Click to expand...
How old’s your son? I’m not opposed to pre-arranged marriages when it comes to faith and football allegiances.

I’ve got 9 and 5 year old girls that both hate the whole state of Alabama (except for Gulf Shores).
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, esands88, Ulysees E. McGill and 11 others
#172,279
#172,279
Brillovol said:
How old’s your son? I’m not opposed to pre-arranged marriages when it comes to faith and football allegiances.

I’ve got 9 and 5 year old girls that both hate the whole state of Alabama (except for Gulf Shores).
Click to expand...
I wish Tennessee could trade Memphis for Gulf Shores. 😏
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, Ulysees E. McGill, Big Orange#1 and 6 others
#172,281
#172,281
wuwh_08 said:
Thanks for the peak behind the curtain on his issues. But since this is a message board and everyone has an opinion here is mine.

Back injuries are the EASIEST injuries to fake. I’m not saying that is what he is doing I am just saying this from years of experience of studying the human condition.

You go to the doctor and say “my back hurts”. Ok, let’s get an X-ray/MRI. Nothing shows up. “My back still hurts”. Let’s try Physical Therapy. “My back still hurts”. Let’s medicate the symptom. “My back still hurts”. Doctor says...”I don’t know what to tell you”

From my observations unless something comes up like a bulging disk/arthritis in the first case it’s in the mind or in the heart!

Feel free to come @ me i don’t mind not changing my opinion unless you have a compelling argument.
Click to expand...
He's not filling a lawsuit to "turn his wreck into a check", what's the reasoning behind him faking an injury for doctors In this scenario?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DancingVol, orangebloodgmc, LaagerVol and 1 other person
#172,288
#172,288
Smokeytom said:
Inductive arguments are the arguments we make when we cannot know something for 100% certainty. Meaning that even if we assume the truth of the premises of an argument it is not guaranteed that the conclusion will follow absolutely. So, inductive arguments boil down to who has the best evidence and ability to persuade in support of their argument.

We’re making inductive arguments right now. You’re support is past years failures. My support is the continuity of the staff and players.

What’s funny here is that my expectations are only 1 win above yours. I’m happy with 7-5. However, Pruitt’s visible confidence and Chaney’s known X’s and O’s prowess have me gearing towards us pulling an upset somewhere (preferably The Swamp) and finishing 8-4.
Click to expand...

Ok, I’m a gwina say this here just onct. You come on here with all yore big fancy talkin that don’t a nary one of us rightly unnerstanz. Seemz like to me you otter be a Vandy fan or sumpin with all that thar commie soundin stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill, Sleegro and Ertel
#172,295
#172,295
Glitch said:
So you are just gonna trot along beside the band wagon? Then if we start winning, you'll jump back on and ride? Got it.
Click to expand...

Being skeptical of all the off-season sunshine doesn’t mean you’re a bandwagon fan.

Can you blame the guy? We’ve heard the same old tired cliches for years and from the same sources. “We’re bigger, stronger, and faster. Leaders are emerging. This team is really bonding. It is the closest team we’ve seen in a long time.” There’s a pattern here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ertel
#172,296
#172,296
Bassmaster_Vol said:
JJ Peterson showing out on defense
Click to expand...
624670.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Orange#1, UT = Checkmate, drvenner and 5 others
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top