2020 Presidential Race

Well, it was nice for awhile. Since vacation is over with Luther is back to his same ole vile deranged self.

I'll give luther credit for at least engaging in discussion and standing his ground for what he believes in. Compared to some of the other leftys that post here.
 
Good job Bernie!





Did anyone see this one? Unbelievable that the leftist got away with this when the conservative group appears to just be sitting quietly in the crowd. Liberals come and disrupt conservative events all the time causing chaos. Facism at it's best. I can see Bernie in the back telling them to clear out everyone that disagrees with me or may challenge a position.

Maybe what conversatives need to do it hire security to throw them out too but the difference is we think we have a great message that everyone needs to hear.

 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
I'll give luther credit for at least engaging in discussion and standing his ground for what he believes in. Compared to some of the other leftys that post here.

Agreed, he willing to debate the issues instead of the "if you don't agree with me you are stupid crowd".
 
Did anyone see this one? Unbelievable that the leftist got away with this when the conservative group appears to just be sitting quietly in the crowd. Liberals come and disrupt conservative events all the time causing chaos. Facism at it's best. I can see Bernie in the back telling them to clear out everyone that disagrees with me or may challenge a position.

Maybe what conversatives need to do it hire security to throw them out too but the difference is we think we have a great message that everyone needs to hear.


Maybe conservatives need to do a better job teaching the Constitution
 
He still thinks we are stupid.
I really don't; well maybe a few, but not you.
I'm still grappling with the acknowledged fact that many non-stupid people supported and continue to support Trump.
One of life's great mysteries.
 
Maybe conservatives need to do a better job teaching the Constitution

At least they kept their composure while asking questions as to why this was occurring. Your side tends to do the exact opposite while throwing tantrums to draw more attention to their "cause".

Take some notes here and learn from it.
 
At least they kept their composure while asking questions as to why this was occurring. Your side tends to do the exact opposite while throwing tantrums to draw more attention to their "cause".

Take some notes here and learn from it.
My side? It seems you don't even know what that is.

But I guess that's all you have when you realize her argument is bunk
 
My side? It seems you don't even know what that is.

But I guess that's all you have when you realize her argument is bunk

I don't have an issue with the reporter being asked to leave, other than it was advertised as a public event and somehow once conservative visitors arrived it became a "private" event.

That's usually how it works for the left (aka your side) When faced with someone who may question their point of view, they change the rules in the middle of the game.
 
My side? It seems you don't even know what that is.

But I guess that's all you have when you realize her argument is bunk

Libertarianism is not a “side” to begin with. It is intentionally propped up as “in the middle” to avert any responsibility. IOW, it is a BS movement that pretends to be for liberty. People who claim to be libertarians female dog about both sides and accomplish nothing.

Libertarians don’t do anything, including voting. So, that’s the extent in which you can say it’s not your fault, while at the same time be blamed for your inaction. What a position to be in!

Libertarianism will never be a large movement because they cannot develop grassroots support, for a number of reasons. First, at least attempt to take some lesser offices, and promulgate from there. Next, keep idiots like Gary Johnson from being the face of your party in national elections. Anyone who doesn’t know Aleppo is a city in Syria and was the epicenter of a terrorist movement (at that specific point in time), has no business being in the WH. Period. Trump can tweet some downright absurdities, of which I’m convinced many are for trolling and giving his dissenters grand mal seizures, but at least he’s not geographically retarded.
 
Last edited:
Libertarianism is not a “side” to begin with. It is intentionally propped up as “in the middle” to avert any responsibility. IOW, it is a BS movement that pretends to be for liberty. People who claim to be libertarians female dog about both sides and accomplish nothing.

Libertarians don’t do anything, including voting. So, that’s the extent in which you can say it’s not your fault, while at the same time be blamed for your inaction. What a position to be in!

Libertarianism will never be a large movement because they cannot develop grassroots support, for a number of reasons. First, at least attempt to take some lesser offices, and promulgate from there. Next, keep idiots like Gary Johnson from being the face of your party in national elections. Anyone who doesn’t know Aleppo is a city in Syria and was the epicenter of a terrorist movement (at that specific point in time), has no business being in the WH. Period. Trump can tweet some downright absurdities, of which I’m convinced many are for trolling and giving his dissenters grand mal seizures, but at least he’s not geographically retarded.

This post tells me you simply don't pay attention. GJ answered the question within a couple seconds but the sound bite was captured and you bought it. Anyone who uses the Aleppo thing proves they are low info and not interested in the real positions of candidates. I vote every election but not for people like Trump
 
Last edited:
I don't have an issue with the reporter being asked to leave, other than it was advertised as a public event and somehow once conservative visitors arrived it became a "private" event.
so is it a 1st amendment issue as she claimed?
That's usually how it works for the left (aka your side) When faced with someone who may question their point of view, they change the rules in the middle of the game.
What is the obsession with trying to pigeon hole everyone into an ideology? As I've said before, this isn't a team sport an you aren't winning anything by putting these clowns in power
 
This post tells me you simply don't pay attention. GJ answered the question within a couple seconds but the sound bite was captured and you bought it. Anyone who uses the Aleppo thing proves they are low info and not interested in the real positions of candidates. I vote every election but not for people like Trump

C’mon now! You can’t spin that. Even Morning Joke grilled him over this, on live television as it unfolded. When he was initially asked about Aleppo, he waffled.

He then deflected to Russia being the catalyst, through US diplomatic relations, to resolving the issues in Syria. The “low info” shtick is old, PJ. Just because you don’t agree with another’s ideology in lockstep unison, that doesn’t mean they are low info. I’d say I was spot on in my description. His clean-up duty after the fact is nothing but him saving face. Dude is a moron.

 
Just because you don’t agree with another’s ideology in lockstep unison, that doesn’t mean they are low info.
so do you ever call out the rights who label everyone who disagrees with them? Yeah I thought so

I’d say I was spot on in my description. His clean-up duty after the fact is nothing but him saving face. Dude is a moron.
a moron yet still a better choice than gun grabber, free speech limiting Trump . Says a lot about the state of the GOP
 
Last edited:
Advertisement





Back
Top