Gun control debate (merged)

#8,559
#8,559
luthervol said:
Living in a society with 390,000,000 guns and 40,000 gun deaths per year is viewed by an increasing number as a direct infringement of their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
Maybe you can view it like the recent forced quarantines of people with mumps. Their individual rights are overridden by the rights of the larger group of individuals making up society..
Click to expand...
Law-abiding citizens committed exactly zero of those deaths. Those are the ones that that would give their guns if forced. Criminals would not. Then, what happened to Venezuela happens here. It's very simple to understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, 0nelilreb, 82_VOL_83 and 1 other person
#8,560
#8,560
azVolFan said:
Law-abiding citizens committed exactly zero of those deaths. Those are the ones that that would give their guns if forced. Criminals would not. Then, what happened to Venezuela happens here. It's very simple to understand.
Click to expand...
Remember he doesnt want to take away guns from anyone. He just thinks that not everyone should have guns, there are too many guns, you cant have dangerous guns over xy, you shouldn't be able to go anywhere with your gun, he wants to track everyone with a gun, and he only cares about life. Even though he literally only posts about guns
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, McDad, joevol33 and 2 others
#8,561
#8,561
LouderVol said:
Remember he doesnt want to take away guns from anyone. He just thinks that not everyone should have guns, there are too many guns, you cant have dangerous guns over xy, you shouldn't be able to go anywhere with your gun, he wants to track everyone with a gun, and he only cares about life. Even though he literally only posts about guns
Click to expand...

"P-Mag envy". Quite common among the sophisticates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and joevol33
#8,563
#8,563
azVolFan said:
Law-abiding citizens committed exactly zero of those deaths. Those are the ones that that would give their guns if forced. Criminals would not. Then, what happened to Venezuela happens here. It's very simple to understand.
Click to expand...
Many of those 40,000 WERE INDEED committed by law abiding citizens. They were law abiding up to the very second they committed the crime.
 
#8,566
#8,566
LouderVol said:
Remember he doesnt want to take away guns from anyone. He just thinks that not everyone should have guns, there are too many guns, you cant have dangerous guns over xy, you shouldn't be able to go anywhere with your gun, he wants to track everyone with a gun, and he only cares about life. Even though he literally only posts about guns
Click to expand...
I was really hoping to get his vision of how gun confiscation would go but I think he knows it would go very poorly. I think there would be a significant amount of law enforcement and military on our side. That's why they keep nipping at gun rights and why anyone who cares about gun rights should not be in favor of any of these laws. It really is very simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and 82_VOL_83
#8,568
#8,568
luthervol said:
Many of those 40,000 WERE INDEED committed by law abiding citizens. They were law abiding up to the very second they committed the crime.
Click to expand...
And how would any law stop them?
If they are law abiding are you going take away their right? On what grounds? Remember they are law abiding before.
 
#8,570
#8,570
LouderVol said:
And how would any law stop them?
If they are law abiding are you going take away their right? On what grounds? Remember they are law abiding before.
Click to expand...
Here's the dumbass Lib logic.....kid walks up to a wasp's nest in the woods...wasps not bothering anyone. Kid gets stung. Conservative says leave the wasps alone stupid and you won't get stung. Liberal hires someone to go into the woods for them and kill the wasps. Coddles the child and gives them ice cream.

Moral of the story: Cons use personal responsibility to teach a lesson and a deterrent to enforce this lesson. Liberals remove the object to keep from teaching personal responsibility and create a calming no fault environment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, marcusluvsvols, volinsd and 1 other person
#8,571
#8,571
82_VOL_83 said:
Here's the dumbass Lib logic.....kid walks up to a wasp's nest in the woods...wasps not bothering anyone. Kid gets stung. Conservative says leave the wasps alone stupid and you won't get stung. Liberal hires someone to go into the woods for them and kill the wasps. Coddles the child and gives them ice cream.

Moral of the story: Cons use personal responsibility to teach a lesson and a deterrent to enforce this lesson. Liberals remove the object to keep from teaching personal responsibility and create a calming no fault environment.
Click to expand...
"Bet you wont do that again, will you?" Parental teaching 101
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, GroverCleveland and 82_VOL_83
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top