Gun control debate (merged)

[BigOrangeD]

Trump Withdraws the US from the UN's Arms Trade Treaty


Styxhexenhammer666

 

[NurseGoodVol]

WTH is she even talking about?

"During a town hall hosted by CNN, Harris said that if a bill from Congress did not make it to her desk, she would unilaterally mandate background checks for customers purchasing a firearm from any dealer who sells more than five guns a year. Dealers who violate the law, she said, would have their licenses revoked."

There is nobody with an FFL license that isn't already required to do a BGC.

Shhhh .... Just let kamala ramble a bit longer.

 

[luthervol]

WTH is she even talking about?

"During a town hall hosted by CNN, Harris said that if a bill from Congress did not make it to her desk, she would unilaterally mandate background checks for customers purchasing a firearm from any dealer who sells more than five guns a year. Dealers who violate the law, she said, would have their licenses revoked."

There is nobody with an FFL license that isn't already required to do a BGC.

So everyone who sells more than five guns a year has an FFL license?

 

[Tennesseefan2019]

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

So everyone who sells more than five guns a year has an FFL license?

hmmmmm. You mean laws concerning guns arent abided? Yet you and your lunatic fringe want more laws.


Makes sense.

 

[luthervol]

If you own a legally purchased item the government cannot enact a ban and force you to give up said item without purchasing it from you. The ban itself is not unconstitutional (sadly) its the fact the government didn’t offer payment or grandfather in the ones already owned.

Sort of like asbestos?

 

[luthervol]

hmmmmm. You mean laws concerning guns arent abided? Yet you and your lunatic fringe want more laws.


Makes sense.

No laws are fully abided. Does that mean you and your moronic fringe believe we should have no laws? hmmmmmmmmmmmm. (more m's than you had)

 

[hndog609]

So everyone who sells more than five guns a year has an FFL license?

You need to note the "licences revoked" part.

 

[luthervol]

You need to note the "licences revoked" part.

lol. I think implied is that anyone who sells more than 5 guns a year will have be to licensed. Is that currently the law?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

No laws are fully abided. Does that mean you and your moronic fringe believe we should have no laws? hmmmmmmmmmmmm. (more m's than you had)

You seem a little more triggered than usual today luth. Oh, and you didn't NEED that many mmmms.

 

[hog88]

Sort of like asbestos?

What about asbestos? I can’t wait to see how you’re going to try and connect these dots.

 

[luthervol]

You seem a little more triggered than usual today luth. Oh, and you didn't NEED that many mmmms.

I was a little worried about the excessive use of m's, but threw caution to the wind for dramatic effect.

Being triggered seems to be in the eyes of the beholder. I thought my reply to your post matched in tone. I work hard at that, you know.

 

[82_VOL_83]

I ask this with no agenda or no trolling in mind. If one weapon is banned, how is that losing rights? It is simply losing the right to own that one weapon, correct? I am pretty sure I cannot own a SAM but I do not believe it the ban on them violates my rights.

Because you won't stop at one. If you deny that you are a troll.

 

[luthervol]

What about asbestos? I can’t wait to see how you’re going to try and connect these dots.

Government found it a danger to society, banned it's use, required removal from public places, and required removal before any sell. It was once legal to use, now it is not.

 

[82_VOL_83]

Government found it a danger to society, banned it's use, required removal from public places, and required removal before any sell. It was once legal to use, now it is not.

But how does it relate to a firearm?

 

[NorthDallas40]

You seem a little more triggered than usual today luth. Oh, and you didn't NEED that many mmmms.

Well played

 

[82_VOL_83]

But how does it relate to a firearm?

Come on lothlow, step in it....again.

 

[luthervol]

Because you won't stop at one. If you deny that you are a troll.

And gun manufactures will not stop attempting to design more efficient and deadly weapons that push the line of legality.
If you deny that, you are the troll of all trolls. The trolliest of all.

 

[luthervol]

But how does it relate to a firearm?

In the obvious ways.
Certain types of building materials are determined to have a level of danger to the public that outweighs the usefulness.
Not that anyone would ever advocate banning all building materials.

 

[RikidyBones]

But how does it relate to a firearm?

Obviously you didnt read the part of the Bill of Rights that asbestos possession is a God given, natural right. Not one given by the government.

 

[RikidyBones]

In the obvious ways.
Certain types of building materials are determined to have a level of danger to the public that outweighs the usefulness.
Not that anyone would ever advocate banning all building materials.

That Amendment talking about our rights to bear all building materials should have stopped that ban.

 

[evillawyer]

So do any of you AR-15 leg humpers know what’s going on at the NRA? You know it must be bad if Ollie North of all people is resigning in protest for alleged financial improprieties.

 

[0nelilreb]

So do any of you AR-15 leg humpers know what’s going on at the NRA? You know it must be bad if Ollie North of all people is resigning in protest for alleged financial improprieties.

That’s the equal to me saying do any of you blackface leg humpers know what’s going on in the Virginia capital , since your governor and his cotton gifting wife is doing their thing in public it must not be bad enough for them to leave . So do you ?

 

[luthervol]

Obviously you didnt read the part of the Bill of Rights that asbestos possession is a God given, natural right. Not one given by the government.

It's next to the section stating that owning an AR-15 is a God given, natural right.

 

[hog88]

Government found it a danger to society, banned it's use, required removal from public places, and required removal before any sell. It was once legal to use, now it is not.

They didn’t require by threat of imprisonment for private citizens to destroy their property or surrender it so try again.