2020 Presidential Race

But he talked to Russians at some point in his life!

Just imagine when libs have a moment of lucidity and realize there has been a phone in the oval office that goes to the Kremlin ... and it's been there for decades. All those presidents who have or could have talked to the Russkies ... collusion that must be investigated..
 
There is a rational basis to deny a convicted felon a firearm even after their sentence is complete given recidivism rates.

Thank you for explaining exactly why convicted felons shouldn’t be able to vote or by firearms to the dolts here that think otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Thank you for explaining exactly why convicted felons shouldn’t be able to vote or by firearms to the dolts here that think otherwise.


To be clear, I think suspending a right to vote during serving of a prison sentence is a reasonable part of suspending the convicted person's civil rights.

Post-incarceration, I have a hard time justifying why they can't then vote, since their rights have been restored.

But, post-incarceration, as a preventive measure, there is a rational basis to continue not to allow them to possess a firearm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kingston Vol
I find it amusing to watch Bern Bern spin his web and then answer questions like Danny Devito . So Bern wants to help African Americans vote in jail , he said he will sign the reparations bill if it comes up , he want to help the minorities become successful but only to a point because if they are too successful he thinks that a 90% income tax on them is fair . Oh but that not all , Health care and higher education is a right . Lol isn’t socialism grand ?

Too bad people don't realize that socialists believe that you are unable to think for yourself ... they just confiscate what you have and decide what you need ... like an ape in a cage. And the hilarious part is that socialists actually believe they are the intellectuals while they trample any rational but non liberal thought.
 
To be clear, I think suspending a right to vote during serving of a prison sentence is a reasonable part of suspending the convicted person's civil rights.

Post-incarceration, I have a hard time justifying why they can't then vote, since their rights have been restored.

But, post-incarceration, as a preventive measure, there is a rational basis to continue not to allow them to possess a firearm.

So your ok with some of their rights being given back to them but not all of them.
 
There is a rational basis to deny a convicted felon a firearm even after their sentence is complete given recidivism rates.

Then I guess they aren't trustworthy enough to vote either, and I happen to agree with you about the firearms. Apparently most libs pushing the issue aren't bothered by recidivism; of course, they don't think prison is a positive thing either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nuclearjunky
The I guess they aren't trustworthy enough to vote either, and I happen to agree with you about the firearms. Apparently most libs pushing the issue aren't bothered by recidivism; of course, they don't think prison is a positive thing either.

Prison really isn't a positive thing, but it is a necessity.

And I don’t want to give a convicted wife beater the right to vote again. That’s part of the punishment for being a wife beater.

I think if you are a tax paying citizen who's not incarcerated, you should have the right to vote. Low level offenders paid their time in prison.
 
Under the circumstances, correct.

Part of the punishment for being convicted of a felony is not being able to vote. You may walk free again but that is a burden that must follow them forever. And voting is every much a crucial right guaranteed to us in the Constitution as owning the firearm of our choice, if not more important. You give up both when you commit a felony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and AM64
Not if it put Bernie, Warren, Harris or Biden in the WH.
Same crap. Just going to get worse the longer it gets put off. If you are worried about the other side taking over the best time to do this is with an incumbent in office. They typically stay in power.

The fact that many are worried is all the proof I need that it could work.
 
Prison really isn't a positive thing, but it is a necessity.



I think if you are a tax paying citizen who's not incarcerated, you should have the right to vote. Low level offenders paid their time in prison.

Good to know you consider domestic assault a low level crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
To be clear, I think suspending a right to vote during serving of a prison sentence is a reasonable part of suspending the convicted person's civil rights.

Post-incarceration, I have a hard time justifying why they can't then vote, since their rights have been restored.

But, post-incarceration, as a preventive measure, there is a rational basis to continue not to allow them to possess a firearm.
Not really. And you prove you dont have one because you dont make the same argument for both rights.

I have been far more negatively impacted by people with votes than I have people with guns. I mean it got us Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nuclearjunky
There is a rational basis to deny a convicted felon a firearm even after their sentence is complete given recidivism rates.

Then the same applies to the right to vote.

That being said, I think a big problem with our criminal justice system is the fact people pay for their crimes regardless what the were for life. If a person is sentenced to x number of years and he completes that sentence all (and I mean all) rights should be restored upon their release. No registries, no restrictions and no disclosure. If the crime is so heinous that an individual needs to pay for it the rest of their life they should be in prison for life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Tulsi Gabbard: Trump Hiding Saudis’ Role in Sri Lanka Jihad from Christians

2020 Democrat presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (HI) said Wednesday that the Trump White House is attempting to “hide the truth” about terrorism “inspired by extremist Saudi ideology” from Christian voters.

GettyImages-1125062855-640x480.jpg


In a video shared to social media, Gabbard argued the attacks on Christians, including the Easter Sunday bombings in Sri Lanka that killed at least 359 people, are “inspired by extremist Saudi ideology that the Saudis spend billions propagating worldwide.”
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1121025866501279744
“The Saudis have been spending billions of dollars spreading this most intolerant form of Islam, sometimes known as Wahhabi Salafism, through this mosque and schools around the world,” Gabbard said.

She continued: “There are hundreds of terrorist organizations who are inspired by and followers of this ideology yet President Trump and Pence, who pose as defenders of Christians and Christianity, have embraced the Saudis — the purveyors of this anti-Christian jihad.”

The Hawaii congresswoman then urged her supporters to call on President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to end the U.S.’s “unholy alliance with Saudi Arabia.”

Tulsi Gabbard: Trump Hiding Saudis' Role in Sri Lanka Jihad

Gabbard seems to be one of the sane ones. Telling a lot of truth here.
 
Then the same applies to the right to vote.

That being said, I think a big problem with our criminal justice system is the fact people pay for their crimes regardless what the were for life. If a person is sentenced to x number of years and he completes that sentence all (and I mean all) rights should be restored upon their release. No registries, no restrictions and no disclosure. If the crime is so heinous that an individual needs to pay for it the rest of their life they should be in prison for life.


If you go to your county jail and pull the list of inmates who are pretrial or presentencing for felonies, and look at their charges, you will see why you don't want them to have guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
If you go to your county jail and pull the list of inmates who are pretrial or presentencing for felonies, and look at their charges, you will see why you don't want them to have guns.

And you keep supporting the reason why they shouldn’t be able to vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
If you go to your county jail and pull the list of inmates who are pretrial or presentencing for felonies, and look at their charges, you will see why you don't want them to have guns.

If their crimes are that bad they should never get out of prison. Once a person has paid their debt to society they should have a clean slate.
 
Cher Doubles Down: ‘Excuse the Fk Out of Me If I Don’t Want, Murders, Rapists, & CHILD MOLESTERS to Vote’

Pop star Cher defended herself from attacks on social media Tuesday in a series of now-deleted tweets after she was criticized for questioning Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) plan to let felons and terrorists vote.

“TERRORIST KILLED INNOCENT PPL. IM SICK OF BEING NAILED 2 CROSS BECAUSE U PPL THINK IM A RACIST‼️IM NOT GOING TO DEFEND MYSELF‼️I CARE 4 ALL PPL,TRY TO HELP ALL PPL,” Cher said. “Excuse The Fk Out Of Me If I don’t want ,Murders, Rapists, &; CHILD MOLESTERS of every color to vote.”

This post comes in response to a social media user who criticized Cher for panning the idea of letting felons vote.

Cher1.jpg



Cher Doubles Down: 'Excuse the Fk Out of Me If I Don’t Want, Murders, Rapists, & CHILD MOLESTERS to Vote'
Someone woke up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and AM64
If their crimes are that bad they should never get out of prison. Once a person has paid their debt to society they should have a clean slate.

I tend to question whether someone with a reduced sentence because a plea deal (accepting shorter time for a guilty plea or a lesser charge) was easier on the prosecutor or someone with an early release because of overcrowding has really paid his time.
 

VN Store



Back
Top