Mueller Report Imminent

[NCFisher]

Trying to defend your question begging is like hitting rock bottom and then eating a Tide Pod to celebrate.

Is it tasty?

What's to defend? The answers are still 'yes' and 'no' unless you're asserting Mueller was elected. Then, we'd reaaaally have some work to do.

 

[lawgator1]

And now the facts, not the spin, are slowly emerging.....

"The Russian contacts consisted of business connections, offers of assistance to the campaign, invitations for candidate Trump and Putin to meet in person, invitations for campaign officials and representatives of the Russian government to meet, and policy positions seeking improved US-Russian relations," Mueller wrote in the report.

"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in the election interference activities," the report said.

Mueller specifically said Trump's presidential campaign "showed interest" in WikiLeaks' releases of emails that the Russians stole from the Democrats to hurt his opponent Hillary Clinton.

"

With respect to whether the President can be found to have obstructed justice by exercising his powers under Article II of the Constitution, we concluded that Congress has the authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

I caught this line from Barr as well and mentioned it in this thread:

Barr noted earlier Thursday that "publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy."

That is Barr trying to sanitize what Trump did !!

 

[lawgator1]

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Time for Congress to now do its job and make that detemrination. Not Barr.

 

[theFallGuy]

According to you guys they could not have been brought other than by the House impeaching him, which is still on the table.

Let's see the full report and decide if he did, or did not, obstruct and whether he should, or should not be, impeached.

Here comes LG the new attorney general. He is going to use his totally UNBIASED opinion to investigate this matter for us.

 

[theFallGuy]

 

[BigOrangeD]

And now the facts, not the spin, are slowly emerging.....

​

"​

I caught this line from Barr as well and mentioned it in this thread:



That is Barr trying to sanitize what Trump did !!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keep trying LG. You go boy!

 

[volinbham]

Seems like it's gonna happen. Trump is screwed.

Blue font or did you mean to say Trump will be reelected if Dems go for impeachment?

 

[Hunerwadel]

And now the facts, not the spin, are slowly emerging.....

​

"​

I caught this line from Barr as well and mentioned it in this thread:



That is Barr trying to sanitize what Trump did !!

This isn't what Barr told us at all. I doubt if he even read the report before he made his conclusions. He's obviously just a Trump shill.

 

[NCFisher]

Jerrold Nadler summoned Robert Mueller to testify in front of the House Judiciary committee The Democrats are going to destroy Robert Mueller for not saying what they wanted him to say

We all know Bob Mueller is a Russian asset.

Here we have another day of Democrat outrage that a POTUS did not commit a crime or cooperate with a hostile foreign power...what a dang world.

It's congenital, so let's be understanding.

Now, SUCK IT YOU COMMIE LOSERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[LouderVol]

Its interesting that Barr confirmed Russian efforts to interfere in our election, and specifically that they were the ones who hacked Clinton and DNC servers, then gave it to Wilkileaks.

"I looooooove Wikileaks."

Oh, and will Trump FINALLY admit that the Russians hacked the election? You know, not buy into Vlad's denials.

there is a world of difference between "efforts to interfere" and "hacked the election".

its such an extreme difference its laughable you act like they are similar

 

[theFallGuy]

This isn't what Barr told us at all. I doubt if he even read the report before he made his conclusions. He's obviously just a Trump shill.

So we are supposed to believe the acting Attorney General didn't even read the report because uhh.. your opinion. Seems legit

 

[volinbham]

Time for Congress to now do its job and make that detemrination. Not Barr.

You realize that quote says "we could not prove him innocent" so we cannot say he is innocent.

Aren't you a lawyer? You know about the "proven guilty" standard right?

 

[Tennesseefan2019]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keep trying LG. You go boy!

LG is really House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff

 

[NCFisher]

Time for Congress to now do its job and make that detemrination. Not Barr.

Yes; please go Defcon 1 and impeach.

 

[theFallGuy]

Live look at LG's current state...

 

[hndog609]

there is a world of difference between "efforts to interfere" and "hacked the election".

its such an extreme difference its laughable you act like they are similar

Based on your observation DO NOT hire LG for your defense if he's having to argue the difference between murder and self-defense on your behalf.

 

[Stew Cook]

Blue font or did you mean to say Trump will be reelected if Dems go for impeachment?

I think Barr did a disservice to Trump with the preempting. Trump's political death is in the details. Successful impeachment would not be realistic, but more than enough daggers to ensure he won't be reelected. IMHO

Busy day, I'll get back to ya later, if by chance you disagree.

 

[bamawriter]

Yes; please go Defcon 1 and impeach.

I've repeatedly said that Hillary Clinton was the one candidate that could figure out how to lose to Donald Trump. But I will be damned if the Democrats aren't doing everything in their power to prove me wrong.

 

[LouderVol]

Merges are happening.

@GAVol does the merge put the new posts in chronological order with the old posts when merged? or do the "new" merged posts stay all lumped up at whatever time they were brought in?

 

[NCFisher]

Interesting that while the WH lawyer saw the redacted document no claim of Executive Privilege was claimed.

That snaky Trump is soooo clever in his obstruction, he's doing it in plain view.

 

[Hunerwadel]

So we are supposed to believe the acting Attorney General didn't even read the report because uhh.. your opinion. Seems legit

He must not have read it. What is coming is not supporting what Barr told us.

 

[GAVol]

@GAVol does the merge put the new posts in chronological order with the old posts when merged? or do the "new" merged posts stay all lumped up at whatever time they were brought in?

Everything keeps the same time stamp and the posts are integrated into chronological order

 

[DC_Vol]

And now the facts, not the spin, are slowly emerging.....

​

"​

I caught this line from Barr as well and mentioned it in this thread:



That is Barr trying to sanitize what Trump did !!

 

[DC_Vol]

And now the facts, not the spin, are slowly emerging.....

​

"​

I caught this line from Barr as well and mentioned it in this thread:



That is Barr trying to sanitize what Trump did !!

Can you please explain to me why Mueller didn’t charge obstruction? He had two years to investigate with an unlimited scope!!

Why are you still braying about collusion when it wasn’t charged by your boy Mueller?

 

[BigOrangeD]

I think Barr did a disservice to Trump with the preempting. Trump's political death is in the details. Successful impeachment would not be realistic, but more than enough daggers to ensure he won't be reelected. IMHO

Busy day, I'll get back to ya later, if by chance you disagree.

No need, You haven't gotten anything right so far. Just stay gone Stew and enjoy your Easter and celebrate the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.