Mueller Report Imminent

[Mick]

If I was Barr I would hand it over in 676 days 23 hours and 21 minutes . And $35 mil for postage

I agree that Trump will be out of office by then.

 

[volfanhill]

Apparently basic reporting is what you're struggling with and overreact to. You people. lol

How is anyone saying they want more news when the guy in charge says more to come? How is anyone mentioning the 4 pages not a shot?

 

[RavinDave]

Cool, I like it a lot.

 

[Mick]

How is anyone saying they want more news when the guy in charge says more to come? How is anyone mentioning the 4 pages not a shot?

I don't know what you are asking, especially the last question.

 

[Orangeburst]

How is anyone saying they want more news when the guy in charge says more to come? How is anyone mentioning the 4 pages not a shot?

Actually heard msnbc guest this morning complaining it was only 3 pages as the first page was just cover page material

 

[volfanhill]

I don't know what you are asking, especially the last question.

It’s a sound bite line. He only gave us 4 pages. He has said he is giving more. He needs time to do his job. Stop being coy.

They are attacking Barr for no reason at this point, besides that they don’t like what was found, and that’s bc they know this week is when the news cycle will be all about it. In the coming weeks this will die a quiet death. But bitch and scream now.

 

[Mick]

It’s a sound bite line. He only gave us 4 pages. He has said he is giving more. He needs time to do his job. Stop being coy.

They are attacking Barr for no reason at this point, besides that they don’t like what was found, and that’s bc they know this week is when the news cycle will be all about it. In the coming weeks this will die a quiet death. But bitch and scream now.

There is nowhere in the article i linked that they said anything negative about Barr. That's apparently in your mind.
Actually it's Barr that rushed out 4 pages of nothing. He should have been more transparent and not in a hurry to dominate the headline.

 

[DC_Vol]

Ex-CIA chief offers mea culpa on Trump: 'I don't know if I received bad information'

Former CIA chief John O. Brennan now says his months of attacks on President Trump may have been based on “bad information.”

One of the president’s harshest critics had a muted tone on Monday as he discussed special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” No evidence was found to support the claim that Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign “conspired or coordinated” with Russia.

“Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Mr. Brennan told host Joe Scarborough. “I am relieved that it’s been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election.”

Mr. Brennan said in December 2018, for instance, that Mr. Trump should prepare for the “forthcoming exposure of your malfeasance & corruption.”

John Brennan, ex-CIA chief, offers mea culpa on Trump: ‘I don’t know if I received bad information’

This is VERY interesting. There is more to this.

 

[volinbham]

There is nowhere in the article i linked that they said anything negative about Barr. That's apparently in your mind.
Actually it's Barr that rushed out 4 pages of nothing. He should have been more transparent and not in a hurry to dominate the headline.

on the first part plenty of people have questioned Barr's integrity as an initial reaction

LOL on the second part and the irony that you go negative on Barr

 

[volinbham]

This is VERY interesting. There is more to this.

At a minimum CNN needs to "examine" why they just believed everything he said. Hardly hard hitting journalism if you believe everything a former Chief Spy says.

 

[ajvol01]

In our minds, we should view them as equally guilty/innocent. Clinton emails = Trump obstruction.

You're a case study on mind control by mass media.
Fascinating, but sad.

 

[Mick]

on the first part plenty of people have questioned Barr's integrity as an initial reaction

LOL on the second part and the irony that you go negative on Barr

You don't think it was rushed? I was think it would take him a week or longer.

 

[volfanhill]

There is nowhere in the article i linked that they said anything negative about Barr. That's apparently in your mind.
Actually it's Barr that rushed out 4 pages of nothing. He should have been more transparent and not in a hurry to dominate the headline.

No they did not but the implication is there. He must release the full report. They, and you know, that’s impossible.

 

[volfanhill]

You don't think it was rushed? I was think it would take him a week or longer.

For a brief summary? Yea ok.

 

[Orangeburst]

There is nowhere in the article i linked that they said anything negative about Barr. That's apparently in your mind.
Actually it's Barr that rushed out 4 pages of nothing. He should have been more transparent and not in a hurry to dominate the headline.

It was actually Rosenstein and Barr who submitted the conclusions. You know the same Rosenstein that was Mueller’s boss. You think Rosenstein just reviwed the findings Friday?

 

[volinbham]

You don't think it was rushed? I was think it would take him a week or longer.

He was briefed by Mueller several weeks ago; particularly about the position on obstruction

The report was delivered Friday, if he didn't say something almost immediately Dems would be screaming more than they are now.

He's never said he isn't going to release more and it's imperceptible that he would release what he did if it were in conflict with the report which will be released in some form.

What else could he have done here?

 

[AirVol]

To all the Pubs on here celebrating: Just take a look back at all of Trump's Twitter attacks on Mueller over the last year and a half (literally thousands!). Now, you are rejoicing in his findings? Strange.

Yep even a dirty cop can’t find anything. It’s a win, get over it.

 

[Mick]

No they did not but the implication is there. He must release the full report. They, and you know, that’s impossible.

Not probable but possible, Trump can do it.

 

[Mick]

For a brief summary? Yea ok.

Shouldn't have made it so brief.

 

[GAVol]

You don't think it was rushed? I was think it would take him a week or longer.

No way Friday afternoon was his first look at the findings.

 

[GAVol]

Shouldn't have made it so brief.

How can you even have an opinion on that when you don't know what was in the full report, how long it was or the scope of what needed to be summarized in the first place?

 

[Orangeburst]

No way Friday afternoon was his first look at the findings.

They even said they had obstruction considerations reviewed by legal council. Heck, Rosenstein probably knew the findings weekly and even advised the report.

 

[Mick]

No way Friday afternoon was his first look at the findings.

He was briefed by Mueller several weeks ago; particularly about the position on obstruction

Barr, by his own statements said, he was "fully" briefed when he was confirmed.

 

[Mick]

How can you even have an opinion on that when you don't know what was in the full report, how long it was or the scope of what needed to be summarized in the first place?

It's been going on two years and apparently the 4 pages provided to congress didn't even provide a full scope of what Mueller was actually investigating.

 

[GAVol]

It's been going on two years and apparently the 4 pages provided to congress didn't even provide a full scope of what Mueller was actually investigating.

According to whom? I didn't think anybody had seen the Mueller Report other than DOJ.