Mueller Report Imminent

[Mick]

define "full" report.

National Security redactions okay?

Exemption of Grand Jury testimony okay?

Does it have to be supplemented by things like transcripts of all witness interviews and every document that was examined?

Full as in every word written by Mueller. What do you think "full" meant?

file under not probable.
file under not probable.
if oversight requires supplemental materials.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Just to be clear: you think it would be a good thing for the United States of America if the President of the free world was found to have worked secretly with one of our long-standing enemies to undermine the democratic process of election? And, the fact that that DID NOT happen is the same as UT losing to Alabama?

Might want to take inventory and rethink your views.

Just more proof the left hates America

 

[BigOrangeD]

So how much longer until the Obama Admin faces indictment? Another year maybe?

 

[volinbham]

Full as in every word written by Mueller. What do you think "full" meant?

file under not probable.
file under not probable.
if oversight requires supplemental materials.

Full means many things - Dems have been calling for every word in the report AND everything else I listed. Since that will not happen they will cry foul. Will you?

The report will come out with redactions. The GJ testimony is precluded by law and I can't think of a case where ALL the supplemental materials have been released. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING! MUH!

 

[LouderVol]

Actually, it looks like all Mueller did was to outline actions Trump took that warranted investigating but then didn't take a stand one way or the other as to whether those actions constituted obstruction of justice. He does add further that he and Rosenstein did not feel there was sufficient evidence to proceed in part because collusion had not first been established.

this is interesting to me. it kinda makes sense, common sense wise, but it surprises me that that might be true legally speaking.

 

[Mick]

Full means many things - Dems have been calling for every word in the report AND everything else I listed. Since that will not happen they will cry foul. Will you?

The report will come out with redactions. The GJ testimony is precluded by law and I can't think of a case where ALL the supplemental materials have been released. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING! MUH!

Don't act so surprised that the Dem controlled House is going to investigate. I mean, after 2 years and we get 4 pages. Please save it for everytime a FOIA request is made.

 

[hog88]

Don't act so surprised that the Dem controlled House is going to investigate. I mean, after 2 years and we get 4 pages. Please save it for everytime a FOIA request is made.

They will get much more than 4 pages, DOJ has had the report for a little over 48 hrs so you should be grateful you got a 4 page summary that quick.

 

[volinbham]

this is interesting to me. it kinda makes sense, common sense wise, but it surprises me that that might be true legally speaking.

If you read the memo there are multiple other reasons given why DOJ didn't consider obstruction to occur (lawyers in DOJ were also involved).

Also of note in the memo; the question of making charges was not hindered by consideration of whether or not a sitting POTUS can be indicted. This takes away one of the "get Trump" arguments that he's really guilty but you can't charge him. The decision of "guilty" leading to charges was not constrained by this DOJ policy.

 

[volfanjustin]

Don't act so surprised that the Dem controlled House is going to investigate. I mean, after 2 years and we get 4 pages. Please save it for everytime a FOIA request is made.

After the way those hacks in the House are acting, I take comfort knowing in 2 years their sorry asses will be sent packing

 

[volinbham]

Don't act so surprised that the Dem controlled House is going to investigate. I mean, after 2 years and we get 4 pages. Please save it for everytime a FOIA request is made.

Not my point. The point is the excuse is baked in about why the findings will never be accepted. Make a request you know can never be granted and when it's not say "see?, we told you they were hiding something".

 

[Vol737]

Typical Trump fanboy responses which are totally lacking in modesty.

"Mueller report cannot exonerate Trump."

Typical criminal profile: "He smells very much like sh*t, but we just can't find the dingleberry."

There are a lot of reasons for that:



Let’s not forget Sztrok, Page, Steele and countless others putting political motive ahead of all else, working, conspiring to create lies slung like s**t to foment hate and Intimidation. Your girl Hillary walked because those that should have done their job, those that should have conducted an unbiased investigation like the one Mueller just conducted, not just failed to do so, but refused to do so and everyone in the last Administration was Fing complicit in the matter. I’m no big fan of Trump, but this s*** show put on by the leftists entrenched in our govt, courts, bureaucracies and agencies ought to give you guys pause, because it’s Fing sick. Jussie Smollet says hello by the way.

 

[Mick]

Not my point. The point is the excuse is baked in about why the findings will never be accepted. Make a request you know can never be granted and when it's not say "see?, we told you they were hiding something".

Ah, yes exactly like Judicial Watch requests that get parroted on Breitbart, DailyCaller, National Review, etc....

 

[AirVol]

 

[volfanjustin]

So how much longer until the Obama Admin faces indictment? Another year maybe?

Never

 

[volinbham]

Ah, yes exactly like Judicial Watch requests that get parroted on Breitbart, DailyCaller, National Review, etc....

whataboutism

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Me too.

Yet you want to go back to the same old politician, that lies AND does nothing to help America.

Weird

Trump might lie, but at least his policies are making things better. Id say the tradeoff is awesome.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

The most important question now is what did the President know, and when did he know it. ...….President Obama, that is.

You are the only one that will ask it however. Well, nobody that is in a position to actually DO anything with the information will ax it anyway.

 

[Hunerwadel]

No doubt but I think he fights it.

Want to bet? If he is subpoenaed and fights it I give $500 to your favorite charity. If he testifies willingly or does not fight a subpoena you give the same to mine. (Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital) Win Win

 

[FLVOL_79]

After the way those hacks in the House are acting, I take comfort knowing in 2 years their sorry asses will be sent packing

You made it rhyme!

 

[FLVOL_79]

So many people butthurt the President isnt a traitorous foreign agent..really speaks volumes as to who hates America...

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

So many people butthurt the President isnt a traitorous foreign agent..really speaks volumes as to who hates America...

yes it does.

 

[hog88]

Want to bet? If he is subpoenaed and fights it I give $500 to your favorite charity. If he testifies willingly or does not fight a subpoena you give the same to mine. (Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital) Win Win

No, I'm not that confident.

 

[37L1]

Want to bet? If he is subpoenaed and fights it I give $500 to your favorite charity. If he testifies willingly or does not fight a subpoena you give the same to mine. (Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital) Win Win

Great charity!

 

[hog88]

From the absence of our resident barristers I take it the national BAR Association is tardy on getting their Monday morning talking points distributed.

 

[AirVol]

From the absence of our resident barristers I take it the national BAR Association is tardy on getting their Monday morning talking points distributed.

After applying butthurt cream, they have sticky fingers.