Mueller Report Imminent

#451
#451
Grand Vol said:
Let me go ahead and put a condition on this little "warning" of yours...

Partisan hackery, grasping at straws and countless Congressional hearings will not be any proof of anything happening. For as much as you whined about the multiple Benghazi hearings from the House, you'd best not be supporting multiple hearings of Trump's alleged guilt.

Don't be a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
Too late
 
#452
#452
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496, AirVol, FLVOL69 and 1 other person
#453
#453
Grand Vol said:
Let me go ahead and put a condition on this little "warning" of yours...

Partisan hackery, grasping at straws and countless Congressional hearings will not be any proof of anything happening. For as much as you whined about the multiple Benghazi hearings from the House, you'd best not be supporting multiple hearings of Trump's alleged guilt.

Don't be a hypocrite.
Click to expand...

He’s a never Trumper and therefore logic and reason do not apply when it comes to the president, I’ve said for over two years this was a steaming pile of yak squeeze and that’s been the case the entire time, now is the time to sit back and watch Barr and company go after the real colluders. I see many criminal referrals in the near future however they’re not the ones LG and company have longed for..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
#454
#454
hUTch2002 said:
Hilarious! Matthews is like “but, but Trump once watched Rocky IV that had Russians in it. How is that not collusion? How can you not throw any member of the Trump family that has seen that movie, or any other with Russians, in jail!?”
Click to expand...
good God Chris Matthews is insufferable. Who are the dbags that watch this guy on tv
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#455
#455
Time for Act II, the next investigation:
fe5ebac39e2c8ea53ca5dee5d7527252c238634ef4c3f267091975c10ec4d6c2.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL69, Matt2496, W.TN.Orange Blood and 2 others
#457
#457
Grand Vol said:
Let me go ahead and put a condition on this little "warning" of yours...

Partisan hackery, grasping at straws and countless Congressional hearings will not be any proof of anything happening. For as much as you whined about the multiple Benghazi hearings from the House, you'd best not be supporting multiple hearings of Trump's alleged guilt.

Don't be a hypocrite.
Click to expand...


I agree -- if the full report is released. Otherwise, people will have questions. There will be leaks. Rumors. Endless speculation. Just release it and get it over with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#464
#464
The Supreme Court will meet behind closed doors on Friday to discuss whether to add cases to the court's docket next term, including one petition brought by a mystery company related to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
If the court denies the case, it will represent the last stop for a company that has been fighting a subpoena issued last year by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC.
For months now, the case has been one of the most closely watched and guarded secrets among Mueller's work. The company, that calls itself a wholly owned agency of an unnamed foreign state, fought the subpoena arguing it was immune under a federal law called the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act that limits such prosecutorial action.
It also said that complying with the request for documents would violate the country's own laws.

I still don't see how he can be finished when he doesn't even have all the information he seeks. Maybe Barr will continue the work Mueller started.
 
#466
#466
Grand Vol said:
Lol

You want it out so you can find that one little detail you think leads to collusion and beat it within an inch of its life.
Click to expand...

I would like to hear Mueller explain away the TT meeting. The burning question is Will we be able to adopt Russian babies now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#469
#469
Mick said:
I would like to hear Mueller explain away the TT meeting. The burning question is Will we be able to adopt Russian babies now?
Click to expand...
There was nothing illegal about the meeting if it did occur. What would be illegal is warrentless surveillance inside the building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#472
#472
lawgator1 said:
Only two: some content involving sources and methods, or political cover up.

The problem is that even if it's the former, it will look like its the latter.
Click to expand...
Well we’ve never in history released a complete report due to the “sources and methods” so I wouldn’t expect that to change because of political pettiness
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#474
#474
Grand Vol said:
Lol

You want it out so you can find that one little detail you think leads to collusion and beat it within an inch of its life.
Click to expand...


All you are doing is taking the one leaked point of no indictments and hoping to sweep the rest of it under the rug.

Not going to work.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top