Nash_Vol97
Smells like potential
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2016
- Messages
- 18,461
- Likes
- 68,070
AU is dangerous, but I hate having a one dimensional team like that..Revenge factor, I really don’t see them beating us again. I don’t think our players will let it happen. Plus 4th game in a row, gotta be tired. Play through grant
AU is a team that could put together a nice little tourney run if they get hot, theyre also the type of team that bombs out of the first round.
The simple fact is Gonzaga is #2 in NET. Would have to break down the formula to see why, it's an easy to find on Google. If I had to take a stab, I'd think margin of victory/efficiency has a lot to do with it. Actual scoring margin is capped at 10 pts a game, but efficiency is unlimited. If they won all those Ws with outstanding efficiency and scoring margins, they'd rank highly with NET. Fwiw Zaga is #1 in scoring margin at a blistering 23.8 pt scoring margin.Gonzaga gets a 1 seed because it passes the “eye test”, but plays a weak schedule. They lost to TN, UNC and Saint Marys and play a high school schedule. UT has the better resume but no eye test, makes no sense. Why is Michigan state being mentioned as a possible 1 seed? They have some bad losses.
Still don't get it. Our team was beating better teams by 10 or more points, we beat Gonzaga, lost very few games (Bad loss Auburn??? seriously? The ranked team we are playing today?)The simple fact is Gonzaga is #2 in NET. Would have to break down the formula to see why, it's an easy to find on Google. If I had to take a stab, I'd think margin of victory/efficiency has a lot to do with it. Actual scoring margin is capped at 10 pts a game, but efficiency is unlimited. If they won all those Ws with outstanding efficiency and scoring margins, they'd rank highly with NET. Fwiw Zaga is #1 in scoring margin at a blistering 23.8 pt scoring margin.
But their quadrant 1 record should be a big knock on them too. 4-3 in Q1. We would be 10-4 with another win. Will NET overpower this?
Like the football playoff, it will be interesting to gauge how the committee views these separate items and weighs them.
Still don't get it. Our team was beating better teams by 10 or more points, we beat Gonzaga, lost very few games (Bad loss Auburn??? seriously? The ranked team we are playing today?)
I believe I read on bleacher report that KY should be the first 2 seed instead of TN lolIdk I'm just trying to lay out what the committee uses to decide. There's a reason it would be a close call between the two, it's splitting hairs. Both have good arguments.
But I wouldn't get too caught up anyhow. Being the last 1 or the first 2 is pretty negligible and they end up facing each other anyway.
Hell, a 2 might even keep the chip on our shoulder! We love the underdog role!
At this point, I just want the best bracket for winning-- doesn't matter if it's 1 or 2 seed. Don't want to find ourselves in a Syracuse bracket (for example) and have to play them early.
