Recruiting Forum Football Talk [RIP 9.3.2019]

Status
Not open for further replies.
#128,684
#128,684
Aesius said:
You're free to disagree with it. Facts are facts, though.

Also, tall and in great shape are the key words in your post. That's why you do well on those dating apps. You're correct that most guys aren't tall or in great shape. Being tall is huge for attracting women. My buddy in college was pretty dorky and had no "game" whatsoever, but he pulled all the time because he's 6'4" with a big frame and a square jaw. He looked like a tight end but was ironically extremely uncoordinated and nonathletic.

And how exactly is it worse for women to have huge numbers of matches? That's essentially proving my point. They have so many matches that they filter out all but the very top percentage of men. And I think you're discounting the experience for most men. They don't have huge numbers of matches. Many men get no matches at all.
Click to expand...

Maybe I misunderstood your post. I thought you were suggesting that dating apps made it worse for “average joes.” That was what I disagreed with. It allows everyone to reach a larger audience, hence a better chance at meeting someone.

I guess from a vanity stand point it makes it harder since you choose to decide who you engage with off of first impressions - looks. But even still, how many people marry someone they don’t find attractive simply because they got to know them over time? I’d say that’s very rare.
 
#128,689
#128,689
eVOLve said:
This shouldn't suprise anyone but my wifes friend rents a home that Holly Warlick and Holly's mother own off of Northshore. Evidently, Holly knows that when the season ends, she is on her way out.

🤞
Click to expand...
It would have been better for her if she "knew" because she was resigning because she was tired of stealing all that money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vols4us and BennesseeVols
#128,692
#128,692
titansvolsfaninga said:
Sounds like something that would get me 25 to life, unless I had a good lawyer.
Click to expand...

But it's an open marriage, you agreed to it lol (in this scenario). You are thinking of being cheated on, which is vastly different, though definitely not worth goin to jail over.

Also, why would you get 25 to life? Please tell me not for attacking the dude. I've never understood that, as if it's that person's responsibility for a spouse to be faithful. Always be mad at the S/O imo. It's them who broke trust and bonds.
 
#128,695
#128,695
samanderson said:
I finally met and married a wonderful woman after I stopped looking for the dream girl and focused solely on not ending up with a nightmare.
Click to expand...

tumblr_mx9rcegTfE1qgf1i8o1_400.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicksjuzunk, Paper_Towel, pismonque and 2 others
#128,699
#128,699
ChattaTNVol said:
More on the Florida match up:

Last year’s game was primarily decided by our turning the ball over 6 times. In first downs we outpaced Florida 18-14. Granted our turnovers gave them a lot of short fields but they still ended up punting 7 times to our 3. Both teams were 4 for 4 in the redzone. On 3rd downs we were 8 of 18; they were 3 for 11. In total yards they had a small edge at 387-364. We held the ball for over 34 minutes on offense to their approximate 25. If we don’t turn the ball over that would have been a much better game and that was with our rookies (#113 returning production) against their veterans (#21 returning production).

We gave them 24 points last year off of our turnovers plus a safety. They had one fumble and we turned it into a field goal.

This is a new year and this year we should see a different game.
Click to expand...

(note: Time of possession is a meaningless stat modern analytics has shown. Efficiency when you have the ball is all that matters. Iirc Auburn had about 50 points and 8 min ToP in the first half of their bowl game).


Not arguing TOs killed us, but UF still beat us play for play. I think using total yards, 1st downs, punts, etc doesn't make sense for this game. All it took them was getting a TO on our side of the field and 2 plays later they were in the end zone. 25 total yards, 0 1st downs necessary.

They did all that damage in a measly 53 plays. BUT it wasn't just short fields, they straight up beat us play for play:

Rushing YPC:
UT - 2.9
UF - 5.9 (double us)

Passing YPA:
UT - 8.3
UF - 9.8

On top of the big rushing discrepancy by carry, our poor rushing efficiency is magnified when you realize we spent a whopping 54 plays trying to run, all for 156 yards. That was 68% of our playcalling that game. We never had much of a chance with that, combined with them gaining yards with ease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jack Burton, GoVolsDR, AngryButchJones and 1 other person
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top