Gun control debate (merged)

Publicly and privately, Pelosi has urged members to treat the Republican motions as procedural feints that should be routinely ignored. “Vote no — just vote no,” she told reporters Thursday, “because the fact is, a vote yes is to give leverage to the other side.”

Our govt at work.

AOC already threatening the moderate Democrats. But we were told she's a nobody and the party isn't going further left?
 
Lol

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...d163fe-3b87-11e9-a06c-3ec8ed509d15_story.html

House Democrats exploded in recriminations Thursday over moderates bucking the party, with liberal Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez threatening to put those voting with Republicans “on a list” for a primary challenge.

In a closed-door session, a frustrated Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) lashed out at about two dozen moderates and pressured them to get on board. “We are either a team or we’re not, and we have to make that decision,” Pelosi said, according to two people present but not authorized to discuss the remarks publicly.

But Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the unquestioned media superstar of the freshman class, upped the ante, admonishing the moderates and indicating she would help liberal activists unseat them in the 2020 election.

Corbin Trent, a spokesman for Ocasio-Cortez, said she told her colleagues that Democrats who side with Republicans “are putting themselves on a list.”

“She said that when activists ask her why she had to vote for a gun safety bill that also further empowers an agency that forcibly injects kids with psychotropic drugs, they’re going to want a list of names and she’s going to give it to them,” Trent said, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Two months in and they are struggling ? How is this possible ? I thought they were going to come in , take over and show those do nothing Rs how it’s done .. you know for the people . This is why you have to be careful what you wish for when asking for power . 😂
 
You don't understand! Those Glocks are dangerous! They can slip through airport metal detectors because they are made of plastic!

AND they go off when the trigger is pulled!
Are you trying to be cute? There is no defending this and foolish to try.
 
Embrace it. Be proud of it. You've earned it.
I am. But I know you guys will relentlessly try to frame the term in an inaccurate way (just as you did in your post). It will be a replay of the way the right wing propaganda machine tried to paint the term "liberal" in the 80's. I have no doubt it will work once again for that same segment of society.
 
I am. But I know you guys will relentlessly try to frame the term in an inaccurate way (just as you did in your post). It will be a replay of the way the right wing propaganda machine tried to paint the term "liberal" in the 80's. I have no doubt it will work once again for that same segment of society.
You're a freaking communist.
 
I am. But I know you guys will relentlessly try to frame the term in an inaccurate way (just as you did in your post). It will be a replay of the way the right wing propaganda machine tried to paint the term "liberal" in the 80's. I have no doubt it will work once again for that same segment of society.
Lulz. Somebody is salty.

If you're a proud Socialist Liberal what does it matter how we frame it (misframe implied)?

Let's start a new thread and not sully the gun discussion.
 
Lulz. Somebody is salty.

If you're a proud Socialist Liberal what does it matter how we frame it (misframe implied)?

Let's start a new thread and not sully the gun discussion.
If you're a proud redhatter, what difference does it make if redhatters are portrayed as ignorant, racists, white nationalists?
Got to go.......be gone all day.
Try not to miss me to much.
 
If you're a proud redhatter, what difference does it make if redhatters are portrayed as ignorant, racists, white nationalists?
Got to go.......be gone all day.
Try not to miss me to much.
Your example is untrue for the majority. It disparages in an attempt to gain the high ground for political battle.
My term is used to accurately describe Socialist and Liberals. You are a Socialist Liberal. You want more restrictions on firearms. This thread is about guns. My quip accurately described your position without ad hominem.
There's the difference.
Have a good day, my friend.
 
Your example is untrue for the majority. It disparages in an attempt to gain the high ground for political battle.
My term is used to accurately describe Socialist and Liberals. You are a Socialist Liberal. You want more restrictions on firearms. This thread is about guns. My quip accurately described your position without ad hominem.
There's the difference.
Have a good day, my friend.
It's all they've got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Lulz. Somebody is salty.

If you're a proud Socialist Liberal what does it matter how we frame it (misframe implied)?

Let's start a new thread and not sully the gun discussion.

I gave you a like strictly on your choice and usage of of the word Sully .
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols

Advertisement



Back
Top